From: guro at fb.com (Roman Gushchin)
Subject: [PATCH] selftests: cgroup/memcontrol: add basic test for swap controls
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 17:57:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180515165702.GA26711@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526400353-12991-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:05:53PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> The new test verifies that memory.swap.max and memory.swap.current behave
> as expected for simple allocation scenarios
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> The patch is against kselftest/next branch
Hi Mike!
Looks good to me, thank you for working on it!
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro at fb.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: guro@fb.com (Roman Gushchin)
Subject: [PATCH] selftests: cgroup/memcontrol: add basic test for swap controls
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 17:57:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180515165702.GA26711@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180515165708.y4f5nmkteaqyUP8lLb7dQIKvhW4T2lGhU-Arm0DdF2U@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526400353-12991-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, May 15, 2018@07:05:53PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> The new test verifies that memory.swap.max and memory.swap.current behave
> as expected for simple allocation scenarios
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> The patch is against kselftest/next branch
Hi Mike!
Looks good to me, thank you for working on it!
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro at fb.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: cgroup/memcontrol: add basic test for swap controls
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 17:57:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180515165702.GA26711@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526400353-12991-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:05:53PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> The new test verifies that memory.swap.max and memory.swap.current behave
> as expected for simple allocation scenarios
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> The patch is against kselftest/next branch
Hi Mike!
Looks good to me, thank you for working on it!
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-15 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-15 16:05 [PATCH] selftests: cgroup/memcontrol: add basic test for swap controls rppt
2018-05-15 16:05 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-05-15 16:05 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-05-15 16:40 ` tj
2018-05-15 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2018-05-15 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2018-05-15 17:03 ` shuah
2018-05-15 17:03 ` Shuah Khan
2018-05-15 17:03 ` Shuah Khan
2018-05-15 16:57 ` guro [this message]
2018-05-15 16:57 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-05-15 16:57 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180515165702.GA26711@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com \
--to=unknown@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.