From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: don't allow holes in swapfiles
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 08:50:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516155000.GC23858@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e722c29f7291b9c31533fd8b2e84d7f469c3ac88.1526452889.git.osandov@fb.com>
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:45:38PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>
> generic_swapfile_activate() doesn't allow holes, so we should be
> consistent here. This is also a bit safer: if the user creates a
> swapfile with, say, truncate -s $SIZE followed by mkswap, they should
> really get an error and not much less swap space than they expected.
> swapon(8) will error out before calling swapon(2) if the file has holes,
> anyways.
>
> Fixes: 9d93388b0afe ("iomap: add a swapfile activation function")
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> ---
> Hey, Darrick, I noticed this while writing up a generic xfstest to test
> that the Btrfs swap support patches don't allow a swapfile with holes.
> It'd be nice if we were all consistent :) This is based on
> xfs-linux/for-next. Feel free to fold it in to your patch or apply it
> separately as you see fit. Thanks!
I sent a testcase of my own ("generic: test swapfile creation,
activation, and deactivation") a while back; would you mind sending out
yours so we can combine them into a single testcase?
> fs/iomap.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap.c b/fs/iomap.c
> index d193390a1c20..ba559adaa327 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap.c
> @@ -1214,9 +1214,9 @@ static loff_t iomap_swapfile_activate_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
> struct iomap_swapfile_info *isi = data;
> int error;
>
> - /* Skip holes. */
> + /* No holes. */
> if (iomap->type == IOMAP_HOLE)
> - goto out;
> + goto err;
Ok. I agree that it looks weird to mount a swap file with holes, so I
guess the least-surprise principle applies here and we should emulate
the old behavior completely.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
>
> /* Only one bdev per swap file. */
> if (iomap->bdev != isi->sis->bdev)
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 6:45 [PATCH] iomap: don't allow holes in swapfiles Omar Sandoval
2018-05-16 15:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-05-16 15:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-16 15:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-16 16:19 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-05-16 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-16 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-16 16:26 ` Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180516155000.GC23858@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.