From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] random: Omit double-printing ratelimit messages
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:54:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516205437.GB4378@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526485573.28243.30.camel@arista.com>
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 04:46:13PM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > Yeah, but what you print is not total sum, it's since the last
> > interval because without mentioned flag ___ratelimit() will flush
> > missed counter and print "suppressed" message. They might even
> > double if say other proccess has called get_random_bytes() got to
> > ___ratelimit() and got preempted. This thread finishes
> > initializing random driver and prints this not-proper-sum
> > statistics, and when the code flow is back in the first context,
> > it will print statistics again from ___ratelimit() function.
>
> So, does it make sense to you, Theodore?
> If not - I'll just resend second patch rebasing and dropping this one.
Yes, it's correct that it's not the total sum. I guess your complaint
is that some of the messages are using the "callbacks suppressed"
message, and the last one is using the random drvier's custom message
which I think is much more user-friendly. That being said, although I
think "callbacks suppressed is a terrible message, I agree that using
a single message makes more sense. So setting the
RATELIMIT_MSG_ON_RELEASE and then calling ratelimit_state_exit() from
crng_reseed() does make sense.
In the future I'd like to push for some way to customize --- or
perhaps just fix --- "callbacks suppressed" to something more sane
like, "messages ratelimited", but that's more of an aesthetics issue.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 12:52 [PATCH 0/2] ratelimit: Do not lose messages under limit Dmitry Safonov
2018-05-10 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] random: Omit double-printing ratelimit messages Dmitry Safonov
2018-05-10 18:19 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-05-10 18:37 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-05-10 19:40 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-05-10 19:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-05-11 3:51 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-05-11 12:41 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-05-16 15:46 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-05-16 20:54 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o [this message]
2018-05-16 22:11 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-05-10 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib/ratelimit: Lockless ratelimiting Dmitry Safonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180516205437.GB4378@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dima@arista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.