From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 12/12] i40e: implement Tx zero-copy
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 23:31:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517233115.44c00dee@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180515190615.23099-13-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
On Tue, 15 May 2018 21:06:15 +0200 Bj?rn T?pel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
>
> Here, the zero-copy ndo is implemented. As a shortcut, the existing
> XDP Tx rings are used for zero-copy. This means that and XDP program
> cannot redirect to an AF_XDP enabled XDP Tx ring.
This "shortcut" is not acceptable, and completely broken. The
XDP_REDIRECT queue_index is based on smp_processor_id(), and can easily
clash with the configured XSK queue_index. Provided a bit more code
context below...
On Tue, 15 May 2018 21:06:15 +0200
Bj?rn T?pel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
int i40e_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
{
struct i40e_netdev_priv *np = netdev_priv(dev);
unsigned int queue_index = smp_processor_id();
struct i40e_vsi *vsi = np->vsi;
int err;
if (test_bit(__I40E_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state))
return -ENETDOWN;
> @@ -4025,6 +4158,9 @@ int i40e_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
> if (!i40e_enabled_xdp_vsi(vsi) || queue_index >= vsi->num_queue_pairs)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> + if (vsi->xdp_rings[queue_index]->xsk_umem)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
Using the sane errno makes this impossible to debug (via the tracepoints).
> err = i40e_xmit_xdp_ring(xdpf, vsi->xdp_rings[queue_index]);
> if (err != I40E_XDP_TX)
> return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -4048,5 +4184,34 @@ void i40e_xdp_flush(struct net_device *dev)
> if (!i40e_enabled_xdp_vsi(vsi) || queue_index >= vsi->num_queue_pairs)
> return;
>
> + if (vsi->xdp_rings[queue_index]->xsk_umem)
> + return;
> +
> i40e_xdp_ring_update_tail(vsi->xdp_rings[queue_index]);
> }
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Cc: magnus.karlsson@gmail.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, ast@fb.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
michael.lundkvist@ericsson.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
anjali.singhai@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 12/12] i40e: implement Tx zero-copy
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 23:31:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517233115.44c00dee@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180515190615.23099-13-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
On Tue, 15 May 2018 21:06:15 +0200 Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
>
> Here, the zero-copy ndo is implemented. As a shortcut, the existing
> XDP Tx rings are used for zero-copy. This means that and XDP program
> cannot redirect to an AF_XDP enabled XDP Tx ring.
This "shortcut" is not acceptable, and completely broken. The
XDP_REDIRECT queue_index is based on smp_processor_id(), and can easily
clash with the configured XSK queue_index. Provided a bit more code
context below...
On Tue, 15 May 2018 21:06:15 +0200
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
int i40e_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
{
struct i40e_netdev_priv *np = netdev_priv(dev);
unsigned int queue_index = smp_processor_id();
struct i40e_vsi *vsi = np->vsi;
int err;
if (test_bit(__I40E_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state))
return -ENETDOWN;
> @@ -4025,6 +4158,9 @@ int i40e_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
> if (!i40e_enabled_xdp_vsi(vsi) || queue_index >= vsi->num_queue_pairs)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> + if (vsi->xdp_rings[queue_index]->xsk_umem)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
Using the sane errno makes this impossible to debug (via the tracepoints).
> err = i40e_xmit_xdp_ring(xdpf, vsi->xdp_rings[queue_index]);
> if (err != I40E_XDP_TX)
> return -ENOSPC;
> @@ -4048,5 +4184,34 @@ void i40e_xdp_flush(struct net_device *dev)
> if (!i40e_enabled_xdp_vsi(vsi) || queue_index >= vsi->num_queue_pairs)
> return;
>
> + if (vsi->xdp_rings[queue_index]->xsk_umem)
> + return;
> +
> i40e_xdp_ring_update_tail(vsi->xdp_rings[queue_index]);
> }
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-15 19:06 [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 00/12] AF_XDP, zero-copy support =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 01/12] xsk: remove rebind support =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 02/12] xsk: moved struct xdp_umem definition =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 03/12] xsk: introduce xdp_umem_frame =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 04/12] net: xdp: added bpf_netdev_command XDP_SETUP_XSK_UMEM =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 05/12] xdp: add MEM_TYPE_ZERO_COPY =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-17 5:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-17 5:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-17 7:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-17 7:08 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-17 7:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-17 7:09 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 06/12] xsk: add zero-copy support for Rx =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 07/12] net: added netdevice operation for Tx =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 08/12] xsk: wire upp Tx zero-copy functions =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 09/12] samples/bpf: minor *_nb_free performance fix =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 10/12] i40e: added queue pair disable/enable functions =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 11/12] i40e: implement AF_XDP zero-copy support for Rx =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-15 20:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2018-05-15 20:25 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-05-15 19:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 12/12] i40e: implement Tx zero-copy =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-15 19:06 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-16 14:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-16 14:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-16 14:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Magnus Karlsson
2018-05-16 14:38 ` Magnus Karlsson
2018-05-16 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Magnus Karlsson
2018-05-16 15:38 ` Magnus Karlsson
2018-05-16 18:53 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-16 18:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-17 21:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2018-05-17 21:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-18 4:23 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-18 4:23 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-16 10:47 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH bpf-next 00/12] AF_XDP, zero-copy support Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-16 10:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-16 17:04 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexei Starovoitov
2018-05-16 17:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-05-16 17:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2018-05-16 17:49 ` Björn Töpel
2018-05-16 18:14 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jeff Kirsher
2018-05-16 18:14 ` Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517233115.44c00dee@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.