From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] dax: introduce a ->copy_to_iter dax operation
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:13:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180523161319.GA29519@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152539239729.31796.4765429575408958580.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 05:06:37PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Similar to the ->copy_from_iter() operation, a platform may want to
> deploy an architecture or device specific routine for handling reads
> from a dax_device like /dev/pmemX. On x86 this routine will point to a
> machine check safe version of copy_to_iter(). For now, add the plumbing
> to device-mapper and the dax core.
>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] dax: introduce a ->copy_to_iter dax operation
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:13:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180523161319.GA29519@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152539239729.31796.4765429575408958580.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 05:06:37PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Similar to the ->copy_from_iter() operation, a platform may want to
> deploy an architecture or device specific routine for handling reads
> from a dax_device like /dev/pmemX. On x86 this routine will point to a
> machine check safe version of copy_to_iter(). For now, add the plumbing
> to device-mapper and the dax core.
>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-23 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-04 0:06 [PATCH v3 0/9] Series short description Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] x86, memcpy_mcsafe: remove loop unrolling Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] x86, memcpy_mcsafe: add labels for write fault handling Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] x86, memcpy_mcsafe: return bytes remaining Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] x86, memcpy_mcsafe: add write-protection-fault handling Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] x86, memcpy_mcsafe: define copy_to_iter_mcsafe() Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] dax: introduce a ->copy_to_iter dax operation Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-23 16:13 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2018-05-23 16:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] dax: report bytes remaining in dax_iomap_actor() Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-23 16:34 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-23 16:34 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-23 16:39 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-23 16:39 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-23 16:47 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-23 16:47 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-23 16:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-23 16:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-23 17:04 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-23 17:04 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] pmem: switch to copy_to_iter_mcsafe() Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2018-05-23 16:35 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-23 16:35 ` Ross Zwisler
2018-05-04 0:06 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] x86, nfit_test: unit test for memcpy_mcsafe() Dan Williams
2018-05-04 0:06 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180523161319.GA29519@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.