All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86:add missing CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX for mark_rodata_ro
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 07:58:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180530055815.GB6463@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180529133622.26982-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com>


* nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com> wrote:

> mark_rodata_ro is only called by the function mark_readonly
> when CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=y
> 
> if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set
> a compile warning may be triggered: unused function
> 
> Signed-off-by: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 2 ++
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> index c893c6a..121c567 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> @@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ static void mark_nxdata_nx(void)
>  	set_pages_nx(virt_to_page(start), size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>  void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start = PFN_ALIGN(_text);
> @@ -957,3 +958,4 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  	if (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX)
>  		debug_checkwx();
>  }
> +#endif /*end of CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX*/
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 0a40060..1b7a1a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -1245,6 +1245,7 @@ void set_kernel_text_ro(void)
>  	set_memory_ro(start, (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>  void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start = PFN_ALIGN(_text);
> @@ -1298,6 +1299,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  	 */
>  	pti_clone_kernel_text();
>  }
> +#endif

NAK, this is very ugly and the changelog doesn't appear to be true: the build 
warning does not trigger in the default build, correct?

Thanks,

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, kristina.martsenko@arm.com,
	steve.capper@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	mhocko@suse.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86:add missing CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX for mark_rodata_ro
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 07:58:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180530055815.GB6463@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180529133622.26982-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com>


* nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com> wrote:

> mark_rodata_ro is only called by the function mark_readonly
> when CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=y
> 
> if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set
> a compile warning may be triggered: unused function
> 
> Signed-off-by: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 2 ++
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> index c893c6a..121c567 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> @@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ static void mark_nxdata_nx(void)
>  	set_pages_nx(virt_to_page(start), size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>  void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start = PFN_ALIGN(_text);
> @@ -957,3 +958,4 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  	if (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX)
>  		debug_checkwx();
>  }
> +#endif /*end of CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX*/
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 0a40060..1b7a1a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -1245,6 +1245,7 @@ void set_kernel_text_ro(void)
>  	set_memory_ro(start, (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>  void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start = PFN_ALIGN(_text);
> @@ -1298,6 +1299,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  	 */
>  	pti_clone_kernel_text();
>  }
> +#endif

NAK, this is very ugly and the changelog doesn't appear to be true: the build 
warning does not trigger in the default build, correct?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-30  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-29 13:36 [PATCH 2/3] x86:add missing CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX for mark_rodata_ro nixiaoming
2018-05-29 13:36 ` nixiaoming
2018-05-30  5:58 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-05-30  5:58   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-30  6:07   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-05-30  6:07     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-05-30  6:51     ` Nixiaoming
2018-05-30  6:51       ` Nixiaoming
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-28  3:33 nixiaoming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180530055815.GB6463@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.