From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to correct return value of f2fs_trim_fs
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 23:10:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180530151041.24726-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
We should account trimmed block number from __wait_all_discard_cmd
in __issue_discard_cmd_range, otherwise trimmed blocks returned
by f2fs_trim_fs will be wrong, this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
v2:
- fix to add missing return value in __wait_all_discard_cmd.
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 4b24a68f4dc7..66983acaad16 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1319,21 +1319,21 @@ static unsigned int __wait_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
return trimmed;
}
-static void __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+static unsigned int __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
{
struct discard_policy dp;
+ unsigned int discard_blks;
- if (dpolicy) {
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, dpolicy, 0, UINT_MAX);
- return;
- }
+ if (dpolicy)
+ return __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, dpolicy, 0, UINT_MAX);
/* wait all */
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dp, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, 1);
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ discard_blks = __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dp, DPOLICY_UMOUNT, 1);
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ discard_blks += __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ return 0;
}
/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
@@ -2365,7 +2365,7 @@ bool f2fs_exist_trim_candidates(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
return has_candidate;
}
-static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
{
@@ -2375,6 +2375,7 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_cmd *dc;
struct blk_plug plug;
int issued;
+ unsigned int trimmed = 0;
next:
issued = 0;
@@ -2410,7 +2411,7 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
- __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
+ trimmed += __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
goto next;
}
@@ -2424,6 +2425,8 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+
+ return trimmed;
}
int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
@@ -2434,7 +2437,7 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
block_t start_block, end_block;
struct cp_control cpc;
struct discard_policy dpolicy;
- unsigned long long trimmed = 0;
+ unsigned long long trimmed;
int err = 0;
if (start >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || range->len < sbi->blocksize)
@@ -2472,8 +2475,9 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
end_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, end_segno + 1);
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, cpc.trim_minlen);
- __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy, start_block, end_block);
- trimmed = __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
+ trimmed = __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
+ start_block, end_block);
+ trimmed += __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
start_block, end_block);
range->len = F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(trimmed);
out:
--
2.16.2.17.g38e79b1fd
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to correct return value of f2fs_trim_fs
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 23:10:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180530151041.24726-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
We should account trimmed block number from __wait_all_discard_cmd
in __issue_discard_cmd_range, otherwise trimmed blocks returned
by f2fs_trim_fs will be wrong, this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
v2:
- fix to add missing return value in __wait_all_discard_cmd.
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 4b24a68f4dc7..66983acaad16 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1319,21 +1319,21 @@ static unsigned int __wait_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
return trimmed;
}
-static void __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+static unsigned int __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
{
struct discard_policy dp;
+ unsigned int discard_blks;
- if (dpolicy) {
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, dpolicy, 0, UINT_MAX);
- return;
- }
+ if (dpolicy)
+ return __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, dpolicy, 0, UINT_MAX);
/* wait all */
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dp, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, 1);
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ discard_blks = __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dp, DPOLICY_UMOUNT, 1);
- __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ discard_blks += __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
+ return 0;
}
/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
@@ -2365,7 +2365,7 @@ bool f2fs_exist_trim_candidates(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
return has_candidate;
}
-static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
{
@@ -2375,6 +2375,7 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct discard_cmd *dc;
struct blk_plug plug;
int issued;
+ unsigned int trimmed = 0;
next:
issued = 0;
@@ -2410,7 +2411,7 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
- __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
+ trimmed += __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
goto next;
}
@@ -2424,6 +2425,8 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+
+ return trimmed;
}
int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
@@ -2434,7 +2437,7 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
block_t start_block, end_block;
struct cp_control cpc;
struct discard_policy dpolicy;
- unsigned long long trimmed = 0;
+ unsigned long long trimmed;
int err = 0;
if (start >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) || range->len < sbi->blocksize)
@@ -2472,8 +2475,9 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
end_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, end_segno + 1);
__init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, cpc.trim_minlen);
- __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy, start_block, end_block);
- trimmed = __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
+ trimmed = __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
+ start_block, end_block);
+ trimmed += __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy,
start_block, end_block);
range->len = F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(trimmed);
out:
--
2.16.2.17.g38e79b1fd
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-30 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-30 15:10 Chao Yu [this message]
2018-05-30 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to correct return value of f2fs_trim_fs Chao Yu
2018-05-30 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: fix to update mtime correctly Chao Yu
2018-05-30 15:10 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180530151041.24726-1-chao@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.