From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and use on arm64
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:04:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604090421.GA9482@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180604074029.GN12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:40:29AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series has previously been posted in RFC form here:
> >
> > RFCv1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg634719.html
> > RFCv2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg636875.html
> > v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg655262.html
> >
> > The only change since v1 is that some of the fetch ops are replaced
> > by non-value-returning ops for some of the atomic bitops.
> >
>
> Looks good,
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Thanks, Peter!
> How do you want to route this, through tip or the arm64 tree?
I think -tip would make the most sense, if that's ok with Ingo.
Cheers,
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and use on arm64
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:04:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604090421.GA9482@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180604074029.GN12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:40:29AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series has previously been posted in RFC form here:
> >
> > RFCv1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg634719.html
> > RFCv2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg636875.html
> > v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg655262.html
> >
> > The only change since v1 is that some of the fetch ops are replaced
> > by non-value-returning ops for some of the atomic bitops.
> >
>
> Looks good,
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Thanks, Peter!
> How do you want to route this, through tip or the arm64 tree?
I think -tip would make the most sense, if that's ok with Ingo.
Cheers,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-04 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-01 16:06 [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic, lock}.h and use on arm64 Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h " Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] h8300: Don't include linux/kernel.h in asm/atomic.h Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-07-22 14:06 ` Yoshinori Sato
2018-07-22 14:06 ` Yoshinori Sato
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] m68k: Don't use asm-generic/bitops/lock.h Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] asm-generic: Move some macros from linux/bitops.h to a new bits.h file Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] openrisc: Don't pull in all of linux/bitops.h in asm/cmpxchg.h Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] sh: Don't pull in all of linux/bitops.h in asm/cmpxchg-xchg.h Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h: Rewrite using atomic_* Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] asm-generic/bitops/lock.h: Rewrite using atomic_fetch_* Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] arm64: Replace our atomic/lock bitop implementations with asm-generic Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] arm64: bitops: Include <asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic-setbit.h> Will Deacon
2018-06-01 16:06 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-04 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and use on arm64 Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-04 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-04 9:04 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-06-04 9:04 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180604090421.GA9482@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.