From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: osalvador@techadventures.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
pasha.tatashin@oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Small cleanup for memoryhotplug
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:42:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180607114245.00001068@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180601125321.30652-1-osalvador@techadventures.net>
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:53:17 +0200
<osalvador@techadventures.net> wrote:
> From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to give it a try and do a small cleanup in the memhotplug's code.
> A lot more could be done, but I wanted to start somewhere.
> I tried to unify/remove duplicated code.
>
> The following is what this patchset does:
>
> 1) add_memory_resource() has code to allocate a node in case it was offline.
> Since try_online_node has some code for that as well, I just made add_memory_resource() to
> use that so we can remove duplicated code..
> This is better explained in patch 1/4.
>
> 2) register_mem_sect_under_node() will be called only from link_mem_sections()
>
> 3) Get rid of link_mem_sections() in favour of walk_memory_range() with a callback to
> register_mem_sect_under_node()
>
> 4) Drop unnecessary checks from register_mem_sect_under_node()
>
>
> I have done some tests and I could not see anything broken because of
> this patchset.
Works fine with the patch set for arm64 I'm intermittently working on.
Or at least I don't need to make any additional changes on top of what I currently
have!
Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Oscar Salvador (4):
> mm/memory_hotplug: Make add_memory_resource use __try_online_node
> mm/memory_hotplug: Call register_mem_sect_under_node
> mm/memory_hotplug: Get rid of link_mem_sections
> mm/memory_hotplug: Drop unnecessary checks from
> register_mem_sect_under_node
>
> drivers/base/memory.c | 2 -
> drivers/base/node.c | 52 +++++---------------------
> include/linux/node.h | 21 +++++------
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <osalvador@techadventures.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <mhocko@suse.com>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
<pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Small cleanup for memoryhotplug
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:42:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180607114245.00001068@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180601125321.30652-1-osalvador@techadventures.net>
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:53:17 +0200
<osalvador@techadventures.net> wrote:
> From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to give it a try and do a small cleanup in the memhotplug's code.
> A lot more could be done, but I wanted to start somewhere.
> I tried to unify/remove duplicated code.
>
> The following is what this patchset does:
>
> 1) add_memory_resource() has code to allocate a node in case it was offline.
> Since try_online_node has some code for that as well, I just made add_memory_resource() to
> use that so we can remove duplicated code..
> This is better explained in patch 1/4.
>
> 2) register_mem_sect_under_node() will be called only from link_mem_sections()
>
> 3) Get rid of link_mem_sections() in favour of walk_memory_range() with a callback to
> register_mem_sect_under_node()
>
> 4) Drop unnecessary checks from register_mem_sect_under_node()
>
>
> I have done some tests and I could not see anything broken because of
> this patchset.
Works fine with the patch set for arm64 I'm intermittently working on.
Or at least I don't need to make any additional changes on top of what I currently
have!
Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Oscar Salvador (4):
> mm/memory_hotplug: Make add_memory_resource use __try_online_node
> mm/memory_hotplug: Call register_mem_sect_under_node
> mm/memory_hotplug: Get rid of link_mem_sections
> mm/memory_hotplug: Drop unnecessary checks from
> register_mem_sect_under_node
>
> drivers/base/memory.c | 2 -
> drivers/base/node.c | 52 +++++---------------------
> include/linux/node.h | 21 +++++------
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-01 12:53 [PATCH 0/4] Small cleanup for memoryhotplug osalvador
2018-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Make add_memory_resource use __try_online_node osalvador
2018-06-07 10:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-07 10:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-20 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2018-06-21 1:41 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 7:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Call register_mem_sect_under_node osalvador
2018-06-21 2:03 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Get rid of link_mem_sections osalvador
2018-06-21 2:35 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 17:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-25 17:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-25 17:34 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-01 12:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop unnecessary checks from register_mem_sect_under_node osalvador
2018-06-21 2:38 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-07 10:42 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2018-06-07 10:42 ` [PATCH 0/4] Small cleanup for memoryhotplug Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-07 13:32 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-18 7:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-21 8:32 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180607114245.00001068@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.