From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: remove redundant GEM_BUG_ON check
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:25:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180611162552.GY23723@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180611160037.23402-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:00:37PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check for level being less than zero is redundant as level
> is an unsigned u32 and hence will never be less than zero.
> Remove this redundant check.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468363 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> index 116f4ccf1bbd..a2f782a4f97d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> @@ -208,8 +208,6 @@ static u32 get_log_control_flags(void)
> u32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;
> u32 flags = 0;
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(level < 0);
i915_modparams.guc_log_level is a signed int. So s/u32/int would seem
like a better fix.
> -
> if (!GUC_LOG_LEVEL_IS_ENABLED(level))
> flags |= GUC_LOG_DEFAULT_DISABLED;
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: remove redundant GEM_BUG_ON check
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 19:25:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180611162552.GY23723@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180611160037.23402-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:00:37PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check for level being less than zero is redundant as level
> is an unsigned u32 and hence will never be less than zero.
> Remove this redundant check.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468363 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> index 116f4ccf1bbd..a2f782a4f97d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> @@ -208,8 +208,6 @@ static u32 get_log_control_flags(void)
> u32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;
> u32 flags = 0;
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(level < 0);
i915_modparams.guc_log_level is a signed int. So s/u32/int would seem
like a better fix.
> -
> if (!GUC_LOG_LEVEL_IS_ENABLED(level))
> flags |= GUC_LOG_DEFAULT_DISABLED;
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: remove redundant GEM_BUG_ON check
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 19:25:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180611162552.GY23723@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180611160037.23402-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:00:37PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check for level being less than zero is redundant as level
> is an unsigned u32 and hence will never be less than zero.
> Remove this redundant check.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468363 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> index 116f4ccf1bbd..a2f782a4f97d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> @@ -208,8 +208,6 @@ static u32 get_log_control_flags(void)
> u32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;
> u32 flags = 0;
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(level < 0);
i915_modparams.guc_log_level is a signed int. So s/u32/int would seem
like a better fix.
> -
> if (!GUC_LOG_LEVEL_IS_ENABLED(level))
> flags |= GUC_LOG_DEFAULT_DISABLED;
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-11 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-11 16:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: remove redundant GEM_BUG_ON check Colin King
2018-06-11 16:00 ` Colin King
2018-06-11 16:00 ` Colin King
2018-06-11 16:25 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-06-11 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-06-11 16:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-06-11 16:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Colin Ian King
2018-06-11 16:37 ` Colin Ian King
2018-06-11 16:37 ` Colin Ian King
2018-06-11 16:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-06-11 21:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180611162552.GY23723@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.