From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: speck@linutronix.de
Subject: [patch V4 13/13] x86/apic: Ignore secondary threads if nosmt=force
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:19:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180620201933.588840902@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20180620201907.304694346@linutronix.de
Subject: [patch V4 13/13] x86/apic: Ignore secondary threads if nosmt=force
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
nosmt on the kernel command line merily prevents the onlining of the
secondary SMT siblings.
nosmt=force makes the APIC detection code ignore the secondary SMT siblings
completely, so they even do not show up as possible CPUs. That reduces the
amount of memory allocations for per cpu variables and saves other
resources from being allocated too large.
This is not fully equivalent to disabling SMT in the BIOS because the low
level SMT enabling in the BIOS can result in partitioning of resources
between the siblings, which is not undone by just ignoring them. Some CPUs
can use the full resources when their sibling is not onlined, but this is
depending on the CPU family and model and it's not well documented whether
this applies to all partitioned resources. That means depending on the
workload disabling SMT in the BIOS might result in better performance.
Linus analysis of the Intel manual:
The intel optimization manual is not very clear on what the partitioning
rules are.
I find:
"In general, the buffers for staging instructions between major pipe
stages are partitioned. These buffers include µop queues after the
execution trace cache, the queues after the register rename stage, the
reorder buffer which stages instructions for retirement, and the load
and store buffers.
In the case of load and store buffers, partitioning also provided an
easier implementation to maintain memory ordering for each logical
processor and detect memory ordering violations"
but some of that partitioning may be relaxed if the HT thread is "not
active":
"In Intel microarchitecture code name Sandy Bridge, the micro-op queue
is statically partitioned to provide 28 entries for each logical
processor, irrespective of software executing in single thread or
multiple threads. If one logical processor is not active in Intel
microarchitecture code name Ivy Bridge, then a single thread executing
on that processor core can use the 56 entries in the micro-op queue"
but I do not know what "not active" means, and how dynamic it is. Some of
that partitioning may be entirely static and depend on the early BIOS
disabling of HT, and even if we park the cores, the resources will just be
wasted.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
---
V3: Updated changelog
V2: Moved the mask related hunk to the proper patch and clarified that
the command line switch might not be completely equivalent to the
BIOS switch.
arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -504,8 +504,10 @@ extern int default_check_phys_apicid_pre
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
bool apic_id_is_primary_thread(unsigned int id);
+bool apic_id_disabled(unsigned int id);
#else
static inline bool apic_id_is_primary_thread(unsigned int id) { return false; }
+static inline bool apic_id_disabled(unsigned int id) { return false; }
#endif
extern void irq_enter(void);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ static int acpi_register_lapic(int id, u
}
if (!enabled) {
- ++disabled_cpus;
+ if (!apic_id_disabled(id))
+ ++disabled_cpus;
return -EINVAL;
}
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2204,6 +2204,16 @@ bool apic_id_is_primary_thread(unsigned
return !(apicid & mask);
}
+/**
+ * apic_id_disabled - Check whether APIC ID is disabled via SMT control
+ * @id: APIC ID to check
+ */
+bool apic_id_disabled(unsigned int id)
+{
+ return (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED &&
+ !apic_id_is_primary_thread(id));
+}
+
/*
* Should use this API to allocate logical CPU IDs to keep nr_logical_cpuids
* and cpuid_to_apicid[] synchronized.
@@ -2299,6 +2309,15 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, i
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /*
+ * If SMT is force disabled and the APIC ID belongs to
+ * a secondary thread, ignore it.
+ */
+ if (apic_id_disabled(apicid)) {
+ pr_info_once("Ignoring secondary SMT threads\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {
/*
* x86_bios_cpu_apicid is required to have processors listed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-20 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 20:19 [patch V4 00/13] SMT control knobs Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 01/13] sched/smt: Update sched_smt_present at runtime Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 02/13] x86/smp: Provide topology_is_primary_thread() Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-27 13:56 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
2018-06-27 15:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-27 16:20 ` [MODERATED] " Josh Poimboeuf
2018-06-27 16:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 03/13] cpu/hotplug: Make bringup/teardown of smp threads symmetric Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 04/13] cpu/hotplug: Split do_cpu_down() Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 05/13] cpu/hotplug: Provide knobs to control SMT Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 23:05 ` [MODERATED] " Greg KH
2018-06-21 6:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 06/13] x86/cpu: Remove the pointless CPU printout Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 07/13] x86/cpu/AMD: Remove the pointless detect_ht() call Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 08/13] x86/cpu/common: Provide detect_ht_early() Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 09/13] x86/cpu/topology: Provide detect_extended_topology_early() Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 10/13] x86/cpu/intel: Evaluate smp_num_siblings early Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 11/13] x86/CPU/AMD: Do not check CPUID max ext level before parsing SMP info Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` [patch V4 12/13] x86/cpu/AMD: Evaluate smp_num_siblings early Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-20 20:19 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-06-20 21:44 ` [MODERATED] Re: [patch V4 13/13] x86/apic: Ignore secondary threads if nosmt=force Linus Torvalds
2018-06-28 22:13 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-28 22:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-06-28 22:23 ` Luck, Tony
2018-06-28 22:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-06-29 8:26 ` [MODERATED] " Borislav Petkov
2018-06-29 17:01 ` Luck, Tony
2018-06-29 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-29 18:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-29 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-29 16:48 ` [MODERATED] " Dave Hansen
2018-06-20 20:53 ` [patch V4 00/13] SMT control knobs Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 11:52 ` [MODERATED] " Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180620201933.588840902@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=speck@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.