From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
shubhraj@xilinx.com, robh@kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] serial: uartps: Do not initialize field to zero again
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 07:48:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180627234836.GA1691@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05e553c2-202b-0b4b-8b88-60e330c80fa3@xilinx.com>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 04:19:46PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 27.6.2018 12:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> On 6.6.2018 14:41, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>> Writing zero and NULLs to already initialized fields is not needed.
> >>> Remove this additional writes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> - new patch - it can be sent separately too
> >>>
> >>> drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 3 ---
> >>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> >>> index 8a3e34234e98..5f116f3ecd4a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> >>> @@ -1510,15 +1510,12 @@ static int cdns_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> /* At this point, we've got an empty uart_port struct, initialize it */
> >>> spin_lock_init(&port->lock);
> >>> - port->membase = NULL;
> >>> - port->irq = 0;
> >>> port->type = PORT_UNKNOWN;
> >>> port->iotype = UPIO_MEM32;
> >>> port->flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF;
> >>> port->ops = &cdns_uart_ops;
> >>> port->fifosize = CDNS_UART_FIFO_SIZE;
> >>> port->line = id;
> >>> - port->dev = NULL;
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>> * Register the port.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Alan, Rob, Greg: Any comment about this RFC?
> >
> > I rarely review RFC patchesets as obviously you don't think it is good
> > enough to be submitted "for real" :)
>
> There is one missing minor part but I want to review concept first
> because I didn't find any driver which is using this style.
>
> > If you think this is all good, great, please resend it without the RFC
> > and it will end up in my queue.
>
> I will definitely do it but please look at the concept itself because I
> would like to use this with at least 3 other drivers.
I don't have the time right now to review "concepts", sorry.
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] serial: uartps: Do not initialize field to zero again
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 07:48:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180627234836.GA1691@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05e553c2-202b-0b4b-8b88-60e330c80fa3@xilinx.com>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 04:19:46PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 27.6.2018 12:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> On 6.6.2018 14:41, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>> Writing zero and NULLs to already initialized fields is not needed.
> >>> Remove this additional writes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> - new patch - it can be sent separately too
> >>>
> >>> drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 3 ---
> >>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> >>> index 8a3e34234e98..5f116f3ecd4a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> >>> @@ -1510,15 +1510,12 @@ static int cdns_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> /* At this point, we've got an empty uart_port struct, initialize it */
> >>> spin_lock_init(&port->lock);
> >>> - port->membase = NULL;
> >>> - port->irq = 0;
> >>> port->type = PORT_UNKNOWN;
> >>> port->iotype = UPIO_MEM32;
> >>> port->flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF;
> >>> port->ops = &cdns_uart_ops;
> >>> port->fifosize = CDNS_UART_FIFO_SIZE;
> >>> port->line = id;
> >>> - port->dev = NULL;
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>> * Register the port.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Alan, Rob, Greg: Any comment about this RFC?
> >
> > I rarely review RFC patchesets as obviously you don't think it is good
> > enough to be submitted "for real" :)
>
> There is one missing minor part but I want to review concept first
> because I didn't find any driver which is using this style.
>
> > If you think this is all good, great, please resend it without the RFC
> > and it will end up in my queue.
>
> I will definitely do it but please look at the concept itself because I
> would like to use this with at least 3 other drivers.
I don't have the time right now to review "concepts", sorry.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-27 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-06 12:41 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] serial: uartps: Add run time support for more IPs than hardcoded 2 Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] serial: uartps: Do not initialize field to zero again Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-19 8:09 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-19 8:09 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-27 10:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-27 10:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-27 14:19 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-27 14:19 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-27 14:19 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-27 23:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-06-27 23:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-06-28 7:18 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-28 7:18 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-28 7:18 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] serial: uartps: Move register to probe based on run time detection Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] serial: uartps: Do not use static struct uart_driver out of probe() Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] serial: uartps: Move alias reading higher in probe() Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] serial: uartps: Fill struct uart_driver " Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] serial: uartps: Remove CDNS_UART_NR_PORTS macro Michal Simek
2018-06-06 12:41 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180627234836.GA1691@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shubhraj@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.