From: keescook@chromium.org (Kees Cook)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf/arm-cci: Remove VLA usage
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:45:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180629184536.GA37337@beast> (raw)
In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
removes the VLA in favor of a maximum size and adds a sanity check
at registration time. The sizes are all explicitly enumerated already,
so this just collects them into macros.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA at mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
drivers/perf/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
index 0d09d8e669cd..1bfeb160c5b1 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
@@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ enum {
CCI_IF_MAX,
};
+#define NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX 4
+#define NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX 8
+#define NUM_HW_CNTRS_MAX NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX
+
+#define FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX 1
+#define FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX 0
+#define FIXED_HW_CNTRS_MAX FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX
+
+#define HW_CNTRS_MAX (NUM_HW_CNTRS_MAX + FIXED_HW_CNTRS_MAX)
+
struct event_range {
u32 min;
u32 max;
@@ -633,8 +643,7 @@ static void cci_pmu_sync_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu)
{
int i;
struct cci_pmu_hw_events *cci_hw = &cci_pmu->hw_events;
-
- DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs);
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, HW_CNTRS_MAX);
bitmap_zero(mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs);
for_each_set_bit(i, cci_pmu->hw_events.used_mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs) {
@@ -940,7 +949,7 @@ static void pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
static void cci5xx_pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
{
int i;
- DECLARE_BITMAP(saved_mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs);
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(saved_mask, HW_CNTRS_MAX);
bitmap_zero(saved_mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs);
pmu_save_counters(cci_pmu, saved_mask);
@@ -1245,7 +1254,7 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader;
struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu = to_cci_pmu(event->pmu);
- unsigned long mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs)];
+ unsigned long mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(HW_CNTRS_MAX)];
struct cci_pmu_hw_events fake_pmu = {
/*
* Initialise the fake PMU. We only need to populate the
@@ -1403,6 +1412,11 @@ static int cci_pmu_init(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, struct platform_device *pdev)
char *name = model->name;
u32 num_cntrs;
+ if (WARN_ON(model->num_hw_cntrs > NUM_HW_CNTRS_MAX))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (WARN_ON(model->fixed_hw_cntrs > FIXED_HW_CNTRS_MAX))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
pmu_event_attr_group.attrs = model->event_attrs;
pmu_format_attr_group.attrs = model->format_attrs;
@@ -1455,8 +1469,8 @@ static __maybe_unused struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI400_PMU
[CCI400_R0] = {
.name = "CCI_400",
- .fixed_hw_cntrs = 1, /* Cycle counter */
- .num_hw_cntrs = 4,
+ .fixed_hw_cntrs = FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX, /* Cycle counter */
+ .num_hw_cntrs = NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX,
.cntr_size = SZ_4K,
.format_attrs = cci400_pmu_format_attrs,
.event_attrs = cci400_r0_pmu_event_attrs,
@@ -1475,8 +1489,8 @@ static __maybe_unused struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
},
[CCI400_R1] = {
.name = "CCI_400_r1",
- .fixed_hw_cntrs = 1, /* Cycle counter */
- .num_hw_cntrs = 4,
+ .fixed_hw_cntrs = FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX, /* Cycle counter */
+ .num_hw_cntrs = NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX,
.cntr_size = SZ_4K,
.format_attrs = cci400_pmu_format_attrs,
.event_attrs = cci400_r1_pmu_event_attrs,
@@ -1497,8 +1511,8 @@ static __maybe_unused struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
[CCI500_R0] = {
.name = "CCI_500",
- .fixed_hw_cntrs = 0,
- .num_hw_cntrs = 8,
+ .fixed_hw_cntrs = FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX,
+ .num_hw_cntrs = NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX,
.cntr_size = SZ_64K,
.format_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_format_attrs,
.event_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_event_attrs,
@@ -1521,8 +1535,8 @@ static __maybe_unused struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
},
[CCI550_R0] = {
.name = "CCI_550",
- .fixed_hw_cntrs = 0,
- .num_hw_cntrs = 8,
+ .fixed_hw_cntrs = FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX,
+ .num_hw_cntrs = NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX,
.cntr_size = SZ_64K,
.format_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_format_attrs,
.event_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_event_attrs,
--
2.17.1
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf/arm-cci: Remove VLA usage
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:45:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180629184536.GA37337@beast> (raw)
In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
removes the VLA in favor of a maximum size and adds a sanity check
at registration time. The sizes are all explicitly enumerated already,
so this just collects them into macros.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
drivers/perf/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
index 0d09d8e669cd..1bfeb160c5b1 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
@@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ enum {
CCI_IF_MAX,
};
+#define NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX 4
+#define NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX 8
+#define NUM_HW_CNTRS_MAX NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX
+
+#define FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX 1
+#define FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX 0
+#define FIXED_HW_CNTRS_MAX FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX
+
+#define HW_CNTRS_MAX (NUM_HW_CNTRS_MAX + FIXED_HW_CNTRS_MAX)
+
struct event_range {
u32 min;
u32 max;
@@ -633,8 +643,7 @@ static void cci_pmu_sync_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu)
{
int i;
struct cci_pmu_hw_events *cci_hw = &cci_pmu->hw_events;
-
- DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs);
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(mask, HW_CNTRS_MAX);
bitmap_zero(mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs);
for_each_set_bit(i, cci_pmu->hw_events.used_mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs) {
@@ -940,7 +949,7 @@ static void pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
static void cci5xx_pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
{
int i;
- DECLARE_BITMAP(saved_mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs);
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(saved_mask, HW_CNTRS_MAX);
bitmap_zero(saved_mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs);
pmu_save_counters(cci_pmu, saved_mask);
@@ -1245,7 +1254,7 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader;
struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu = to_cci_pmu(event->pmu);
- unsigned long mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs)];
+ unsigned long mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(HW_CNTRS_MAX)];
struct cci_pmu_hw_events fake_pmu = {
/*
* Initialise the fake PMU. We only need to populate the
@@ -1403,6 +1412,11 @@ static int cci_pmu_init(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, struct platform_device *pdev)
char *name = model->name;
u32 num_cntrs;
+ if (WARN_ON(model->num_hw_cntrs > NUM_HW_CNTRS_MAX))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (WARN_ON(model->fixed_hw_cntrs > FIXED_HW_CNTRS_MAX))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
pmu_event_attr_group.attrs = model->event_attrs;
pmu_format_attr_group.attrs = model->format_attrs;
@@ -1455,8 +1469,8 @@ static __maybe_unused struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI400_PMU
[CCI400_R0] = {
.name = "CCI_400",
- .fixed_hw_cntrs = 1, /* Cycle counter */
- .num_hw_cntrs = 4,
+ .fixed_hw_cntrs = FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX, /* Cycle counter */
+ .num_hw_cntrs = NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX,
.cntr_size = SZ_4K,
.format_attrs = cci400_pmu_format_attrs,
.event_attrs = cci400_r0_pmu_event_attrs,
@@ -1475,8 +1489,8 @@ static __maybe_unused struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
},
[CCI400_R1] = {
.name = "CCI_400_r1",
- .fixed_hw_cntrs = 1, /* Cycle counter */
- .num_hw_cntrs = 4,
+ .fixed_hw_cntrs = FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX, /* Cycle counter */
+ .num_hw_cntrs = NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_4XX,
.cntr_size = SZ_4K,
.format_attrs = cci400_pmu_format_attrs,
.event_attrs = cci400_r1_pmu_event_attrs,
@@ -1497,8 +1511,8 @@ static __maybe_unused struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
[CCI500_R0] = {
.name = "CCI_500",
- .fixed_hw_cntrs = 0,
- .num_hw_cntrs = 8,
+ .fixed_hw_cntrs = FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX,
+ .num_hw_cntrs = NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX,
.cntr_size = SZ_64K,
.format_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_format_attrs,
.event_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_event_attrs,
@@ -1521,8 +1535,8 @@ static __maybe_unused struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
},
[CCI550_R0] = {
.name = "CCI_550",
- .fixed_hw_cntrs = 0,
- .num_hw_cntrs = 8,
+ .fixed_hw_cntrs = FIXED_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX,
+ .num_hw_cntrs = NUM_HW_CNTRS_CII_5XX,
.cntr_size = SZ_64K,
.format_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_format_attrs,
.event_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_event_attrs,
--
2.17.1
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-29 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-29 18:45 Kees Cook [this message]
2018-06-29 18:45 ` [PATCH] perf/arm-cci: Remove VLA usage Kees Cook
2018-06-29 21:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-29 21:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-02 16:50 ` Will Deacon
2018-07-02 16:50 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180629184536.GA37337@beast \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.