From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] acpi: generalize aml_package / aml_varpackage
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 02:26:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710022532-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180709200456-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 08:19:17PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:52:32PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:53:09 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > VarPackage can accept an expression evaluating to int, not just an int.
> > > Change the API to make it more generic.
> > > Further, rather than have users call the correct API depending on
> > > value passed, use either PackageOp or VarPackageOp automatically.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 4 ++--
> > > hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> > > hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c | 11 ++---------
> > > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 2 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > > index 10c7946028..7cf2cf64bf 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > > @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ Aml *aml_method(const char *name, int arg_count, AmlSerializeFlag sflag);
> > > Aml *aml_if(Aml *predicate);
> > > Aml *aml_else(void);
> > > Aml *aml_while(Aml *predicate);
> > > -Aml *aml_package(uint8_t num_elements);
> > > +Aml *aml_package(uint64_t num_elements);
> > > Aml *aml_buffer(int buffer_size, uint8_t *byte_list);
> > > Aml *aml_resource_template(void);
> > > Aml *aml_field(const char *name, AmlAccessType type, AmlLockRule lock,
> > > @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ Aml *aml_create_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *bit_index, Aml *num_bits,
> > > const char *name);
> > > Aml *aml_create_dword_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *index, const char *name);
> > > Aml *aml_create_qword_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *index, const char *name);
> > > -Aml *aml_varpackage(uint32_t num_elements);
> > > +Aml *aml_varpackage(Aml *num_elements);
> > maybe drop it from header and make static so only aml_package() would be
> > left as public API like in spec?
>
> There are places in the spec that say VarPackage.
> E.g. _CST: Return Value: A variable-length Package.
>
> We probably want to keep aml_varpackage around for these
> cases.
And thinking more about this, if you want a package with
# of elements that isn't a constant, you want aml_varpackage.
If it's a constant you have the handy aml_package shortcut.
> >
> > > Aml *aml_touuid(const char *uuid);
> > > Aml *aml_unicode(const char *str);
> > > Aml *aml_refof(Aml *arg);
> > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > > index def62b3112..1996768b40 100644
> > > --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > > +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > > @@ -1016,9 +1016,19 @@ Aml *aml_buffer(int buffer_size, uint8_t *byte_list)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* ACPI 1.0b: 16.2.5.4 Type 2 Opcodes Encoding: DefPackage */
> > > -Aml *aml_package(uint8_t num_elements)
> > > +/* Note: The ability to create variable-sized packages was first
> > > + * introduced in ACPI 2.0. ACPI 1.0 only allowed fixed-size packages
> > > + * with up to 255 elements. Windows guests up to win2k8 fail when
> > > + * VarPackageOp is used.
> > > + */
> > > +Aml *aml_package(uint64_t num_elements)
> > > {
> > > - Aml *var = aml_bundle(0x12 /* PackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
> > > + Aml *var;
> > > +
> > > + if (num_elements > 0xFF)
> > > + return aml_varpackage(aml_int(num_elements));
> > > +
> > > + var = aml_bundle(0x12 /* PackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
> > > build_append_byte(var->buf, num_elements);
> > > return var;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1136,10 +1146,10 @@ Aml *aml_local(int num)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* ACPI 2.0a: 17.2.2 Data Objects Encoding: DefVarPackage */
> > > -Aml *aml_varpackage(uint32_t num_elements)
> > > +Aml *aml_varpackage(Aml *num_elements)
> > > {
> > > Aml *var = aml_bundle(0x13 /* VarPackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
> > > - build_append_int(var->buf, num_elements);
> > > + aml_append(var, num_elements);
> > > return var;
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c b/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> > > index 5243918125..f8246fca6f 100644
> > > --- a/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> > > +++ b/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> > > @@ -309,15 +309,8 @@ void build_legacy_cpu_hotplug_aml(Aml *ctx, MachineState *machine,
> > > }
> > > aml_append(sb_scope, method);
> > >
> > > - /* build "Name(CPON, Package() { One, One, ..., Zero, Zero, ... })"
> > > - *
> > > - * Note: The ability to create variable-sized packages was first
> > > - * introduced in ACPI 2.0. ACPI 1.0 only allowed fixed-size packages
> > > - * ith up to 255 elements. Windows guests up to win2k8 fail when
> > > - * VarPackageOp is used.
> > > - */
> > > - pkg = pcms->apic_id_limit <= 255 ? aml_package(pcms->apic_id_limit) :
> > > - aml_varpackage(pcms->apic_id_limit);
> > > + /* build "Name(CPON, Package() { One, One, ..., Zero, Zero, ... })" */
> > > + pkg = aml_package(pcms->apic_id_limit);
> > >
> > > for (i = 0, apic_idx = 0; i < apic_ids->len; i++) {
> > > int apic_id = apic_ids->cpus[i].arch_id;
> > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > > index 6ea47e2588..2adb1de378 100644
> > > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > > @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_pci(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *memmap,
> > > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CCA", aml_int(1)));
> > >
> > > /* Declare the PCI Routing Table. */
> > > - Aml *rt_pkg = aml_varpackage(nr_pcie_buses * PCI_NUM_PINS);
> > > + Aml *rt_pkg = aml_package(nr_pcie_buses * PCI_NUM_PINS);
> > > for (bus_no = 0; bus_no < nr_pcie_buses; bus_no++) {
> > > for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_PINS; i++) {
> > > int gsi = (i + bus_no) % PCI_NUM_PINS;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: generalize aml_package / aml_varpackage
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 02:26:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710022532-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180709200456-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 08:19:17PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:52:32PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:53:09 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > VarPackage can accept an expression evaluating to int, not just an int.
> > > Change the API to make it more generic.
> > > Further, rather than have users call the correct API depending on
> > > value passed, use either PackageOp or VarPackageOp automatically.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 4 ++--
> > > hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> > > hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c | 11 ++---------
> > > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 2 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > > index 10c7946028..7cf2cf64bf 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> > > @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ Aml *aml_method(const char *name, int arg_count, AmlSerializeFlag sflag);
> > > Aml *aml_if(Aml *predicate);
> > > Aml *aml_else(void);
> > > Aml *aml_while(Aml *predicate);
> > > -Aml *aml_package(uint8_t num_elements);
> > > +Aml *aml_package(uint64_t num_elements);
> > > Aml *aml_buffer(int buffer_size, uint8_t *byte_list);
> > > Aml *aml_resource_template(void);
> > > Aml *aml_field(const char *name, AmlAccessType type, AmlLockRule lock,
> > > @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ Aml *aml_create_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *bit_index, Aml *num_bits,
> > > const char *name);
> > > Aml *aml_create_dword_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *index, const char *name);
> > > Aml *aml_create_qword_field(Aml *srcbuf, Aml *index, const char *name);
> > > -Aml *aml_varpackage(uint32_t num_elements);
> > > +Aml *aml_varpackage(Aml *num_elements);
> > maybe drop it from header and make static so only aml_package() would be
> > left as public API like in spec?
>
> There are places in the spec that say VarPackage.
> E.g. _CST: Return Value: A variable-length Package.
>
> We probably want to keep aml_varpackage around for these
> cases.
And thinking more about this, if you want a package with
# of elements that isn't a constant, you want aml_varpackage.
If it's a constant you have the handy aml_package shortcut.
> >
> > > Aml *aml_touuid(const char *uuid);
> > > Aml *aml_unicode(const char *str);
> > > Aml *aml_refof(Aml *arg);
> > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > > index def62b3112..1996768b40 100644
> > > --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > > +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > > @@ -1016,9 +1016,19 @@ Aml *aml_buffer(int buffer_size, uint8_t *byte_list)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* ACPI 1.0b: 16.2.5.4 Type 2 Opcodes Encoding: DefPackage */
> > > -Aml *aml_package(uint8_t num_elements)
> > > +/* Note: The ability to create variable-sized packages was first
> > > + * introduced in ACPI 2.0. ACPI 1.0 only allowed fixed-size packages
> > > + * with up to 255 elements. Windows guests up to win2k8 fail when
> > > + * VarPackageOp is used.
> > > + */
> > > +Aml *aml_package(uint64_t num_elements)
> > > {
> > > - Aml *var = aml_bundle(0x12 /* PackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
> > > + Aml *var;
> > > +
> > > + if (num_elements > 0xFF)
> > > + return aml_varpackage(aml_int(num_elements));
> > > +
> > > + var = aml_bundle(0x12 /* PackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
> > > build_append_byte(var->buf, num_elements);
> > > return var;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1136,10 +1146,10 @@ Aml *aml_local(int num)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* ACPI 2.0a: 17.2.2 Data Objects Encoding: DefVarPackage */
> > > -Aml *aml_varpackage(uint32_t num_elements)
> > > +Aml *aml_varpackage(Aml *num_elements)
> > > {
> > > Aml *var = aml_bundle(0x13 /* VarPackageOp */, AML_PACKAGE);
> > > - build_append_int(var->buf, num_elements);
> > > + aml_append(var, num_elements);
> > > return var;
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c b/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> > > index 5243918125..f8246fca6f 100644
> > > --- a/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> > > +++ b/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c
> > > @@ -309,15 +309,8 @@ void build_legacy_cpu_hotplug_aml(Aml *ctx, MachineState *machine,
> > > }
> > > aml_append(sb_scope, method);
> > >
> > > - /* build "Name(CPON, Package() { One, One, ..., Zero, Zero, ... })"
> > > - *
> > > - * Note: The ability to create variable-sized packages was first
> > > - * introduced in ACPI 2.0. ACPI 1.0 only allowed fixed-size packages
> > > - * ith up to 255 elements. Windows guests up to win2k8 fail when
> > > - * VarPackageOp is used.
> > > - */
> > > - pkg = pcms->apic_id_limit <= 255 ? aml_package(pcms->apic_id_limit) :
> > > - aml_varpackage(pcms->apic_id_limit);
> > > + /* build "Name(CPON, Package() { One, One, ..., Zero, Zero, ... })" */
> > > + pkg = aml_package(pcms->apic_id_limit);
> > >
> > > for (i = 0, apic_idx = 0; i < apic_ids->len; i++) {
> > > int apic_id = apic_ids->cpus[i].arch_id;
> > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > > index 6ea47e2588..2adb1de378 100644
> > > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > > @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_pci(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *memmap,
> > > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CCA", aml_int(1)));
> > >
> > > /* Declare the PCI Routing Table. */
> > > - Aml *rt_pkg = aml_varpackage(nr_pcie_buses * PCI_NUM_PINS);
> > > + Aml *rt_pkg = aml_package(nr_pcie_buses * PCI_NUM_PINS);
> > > for (bus_no = 0; bus_no < nr_pcie_buses; bus_no++) {
> > > for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_PINS; i++) {
> > > int gsi = (i + bus_no) % PCI_NUM_PINS;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-09 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-05 23:53 [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] acpi: generalize aml_package / aml_varpackage Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-05 23:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-05 23:57 ` [Qemu-arm] " no-reply
2018-07-05 23:57 ` no-reply
2018-07-09 15:52 ` [Qemu-arm] " Igor Mammedov
2018-07-09 15:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2018-07-09 17:19 ` [Qemu-arm] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-09 17:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-09 23:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-07-09 23:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-10 8:02 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-10 8:02 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180710022532-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.