From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: add default values for dynamic timings
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:26:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180717142621.380adf1e@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180714102354.12323-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:23:54 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Some timings like tBERS (block erase time), tCCs (change column setup
> time), tPROG (page program time) and tR (page read time) are derived
> from the ONFI parameter page. They are set in the SDR interface only
> if the chip is ONFI compliant.
>
> It makes these timings unreliable and prevent the driver to use one of
> these four values with a non-ONFI chip.
>
> Fix this situation by taking the highest possible value (or a default
> one) value for each missing timing (stored as unsigned 16-bit entries in
> the parameter page).
>
> This makes tBERS and tPROG being ~65ms while typical values are at most
> a few milliseconds. As these are timeouts, it is not impacting at all
> the performances in nominal use.
>
> tR maximum time and tCCS minimum time (delay to wait after a change
> column) are set, according to the ONFI specification, to default 'slow'
> values; respectively 200us and 500ns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1
> ================
> * Remove in the commit message a wrong assertion on which the problem
> depicted above happened when no ->setup_data_inferface() hook was set.
> * The missing timings were set, for each timing mode, in the
> onfi_sdr_timings structure, not it is done in an else block in
> onfi_fill_data_interface() once.
> * Changed tR and tCCS to be 'timing mode 0' values by default (should
> limit the impact of such a change in throughputs).
>
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c
> index 7c4e4a371bbc..9bb599106a31 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_timings.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>
> +#define ONFI_DYN_TIMING_MAX U16_MAX
> +
> static const struct nand_data_interface onfi_sdr_timings[] = {
> /* Mode 0 */
> {
> @@ -303,7 +305,7 @@ int onfi_fill_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip,
>
> /*
> * Initialize timings that cannot be deduced from timing mode:
> - * tR, tPROG, tCCS, ...
> + * tPROG, tBERS, tR and tCCS.
> * These information are part of the ONFI parameter page.
> */
> if (chip->parameters.onfi.version) {
> @@ -317,6 +319,22 @@ int onfi_fill_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip,
>
> /* nanoseconds -> picoseconds */
> timings->tCCS_min = 1000UL * params->onfi.tCCS;
> + } else {
> + struct nand_sdr_timings *timings = &iface->timings.sdr;
> + /*
> + * For non-ONFI chips we use the highest possible value for
> + * tPROG and tBERS. tR and tCCS will take the default values
> + * precised in the ONFI specification for timing mode 0,
> + * respectively 200us and 500ns.
> + */
> +
> + /* microseconds -> picoseconds */
> + timings->tPROG_max = 1000000ULL * ONFI_DYN_TIMING_MAX;
> + timings->tBERS_max = 1000000ULL * ONFI_DYN_TIMING_MAX;
> + timings->tR_max = 1000000ULL * 200000000ULL;
> +
> + /* nanoseconds -> picoseconds */
> + timings->tCCS_min = 1000UL * 500000;
> }
>
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-14 10:23 [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: add default values for dynamic timings Miquel Raynal
2018-07-17 12:26 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-07-18 7:46 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180717142621.380adf1e@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.