Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/tlb: Make lazy TLB mode lazier

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:33:02AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The tlb flush code first increments mm->context.tlb_gen, and then sends

> shootdown IPIs to CPUs that have this mm loaded and are not in lazy
> TLB mode.
> 
> At context switch time, we have to ensure that we check the tlb_gen after
> we load the old is_lazy state.
> 
> Maybe something like this?
>  
>                 /*
>                  * Read the tlb_gen to check whether a flush is needed.
>                  * If the TLB is up to date, just use it.
>                  * The TLB shootdown code first increments tlb_gen, and then
>                  * sends IPIs to CPUs that have this CPU loaded and are not
>                  * in lazy TLB mode. The barrier ensures we handle
>                  * cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy before tlb_gen, keeping this code
>                  * synchronized with the TLB flush code.
>                  */

Let me try and draw a diagram; that always works better for me that
text. So the relevant ordering is something like:

  CPU0 - switch_mm()			CPU1 - flush_tlb_mm_range()

  [W]	cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy = false;	[RmW]	next->tlb_gen++
	smp_mb()				MB (implied)
  [R]	tlb_gen = next->tlb_gen			native_flush_tlb_others()
					[R]	  cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy


Such that CPU1 either observes !lazy and flushes and/or CPU0 observes
the generation increment and forces a flush itself.

Either way, CPU0 gets flushed.


Also, I don't suppose you've looked at the paravirt instances of
flush_tlb_other() ? They don't elide the flushes because of lazy.