From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/9] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective on cgroup v2 root
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 18:37:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720163712.GU2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4857a9db-ebf5-24f8-c42d-d795f5c75854@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:19:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> I am not against the idea of making it hierarchical eventually. I am
> just hoping to get thing going by merging the patchset in its current
> form and then we can make it hierarchical in a followup patch.
Where's the rush? Why can't we do this right in one go?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/9] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective on cgroup v2 root
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 18:37:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720163712.GU2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4857a9db-ebf5-24f8-c42d-d795f5c75854@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:19:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> I am not against the idea of making it hierarchical eventually. I am
> just hoping to get thing going by merging the patchset in its current
> form and then we can make it hierarchical in a followup patch.
Where's the rush? Why can't we do this right in one go?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-24 7:30 [PATCH v11 0/9] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] " Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] cpuset: Add new v2 cpuset.sched.partition flag Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] cpuset: Simulate auto-off of sched.partition at cgroup removal Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] cpuset: Allow changes to cpus in a partition root Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] cpuset: Make sure that partition flag work properly with CPU hotplug Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize reserved_cpus Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective on cgroup v2 root Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-02 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-02 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-03 0:41 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-03 0:41 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-03 15:58 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-03 15:58 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-06 20:32 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-06 20:32 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-10 15:23 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-10 15:23 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-18 15:21 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-18 15:21 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-18 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-18 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-18 21:12 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-18 21:12 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-19 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-19 14:04 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 14:04 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 15:30 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 15:30 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 15:52 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 15:52 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 16:52 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 16:52 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 17:22 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 17:22 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-19 17:38 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 17:38 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 11:45 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 11:45 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 12:04 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 12:04 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 15:56 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 15:56 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 16:19 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 16:19 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-07-20 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 17:09 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 17:09 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-20 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-13 17:56 ` Waiman Long
2018-08-17 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-18 1:03 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-27 21:21 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-27 21:21 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 15:57 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 15:57 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-20 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-20 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] cpuset: Don't rebuild sched domains if cpu changes in non-partition root Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] cpuset: Allow reporting of sched domain generation info Waiman Long
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-19 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-19 13:56 ` Waiman Long
2018-07-19 13:56 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180720163712.GU2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.