From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] coresight: Cleanup coresight DT bindings
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:09:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180725160939.GA24323@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531997715-6767-10-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> The coresight drivers relied on default bindings for graph
> in DT, while reusing the "reg" field of the "ports" to indicate
> the actual hardware port number for the connections. This can
> cause duplicate ports with same addresses, but different
> direction. However, with the rules getting stricter w.r.t to the
> address mismatch with the label, it is no longer possible to use
> the port address field for the hardware port number.
>
> This patch introduces new DT binding rules for coresight
> components, based on the same generic DT graph bindings, but
> avoiding the address duplication.
>
> - All output ports must be specified under a child node with
> name "out-ports".
> - All input ports must be specified under a childe node with
> name "in-ports".
> - Port address should match the hardware port number.
>
> The support for legacy bindings is retained, with a warning.
>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 91 ++++++++++----------
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
> index 8e21512..f39d2c6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
> @@ -104,19 +104,9 @@ The connections must be described via generic DT graph bindings as described
> by the "bindings/graph.txt", where each "port" along with an "endpoint"
> component represents a hardware port and the connection.
>
> -Since it is possible to have multiple connections for any coresight component
> -with a specific direction of data flow, each connection must define the
> -following properties to uniquely identify the connection details.
> -
> - * Direction of the data flow w.r.t the component :
> - Each input port must have the following property defined at the "endpoint"
> - for the port.
> - "slave-mode"
> -
> - * Hardware Port number at the component:
> - - The hardware port number is assumed to be the address of the "port"
> - component.
> -
Why do you add this in the previous patch and then remove it here?
> + * All output ports must be listed inside a child node named "out-ports"
> + * All input ports must be listed inside a child node named "in-ports".
> + * Port address must match the hardware port number.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
matt.sealey@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, john.horley@arm.com,
mike.leach@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] coresight: Cleanup coresight DT bindings
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:09:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180725160939.GA24323@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531997715-6767-10-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> The coresight drivers relied on default bindings for graph
> in DT, while reusing the "reg" field of the "ports" to indicate
> the actual hardware port number for the connections. This can
> cause duplicate ports with same addresses, but different
> direction. However, with the rules getting stricter w.r.t to the
> address mismatch with the label, it is no longer possible to use
> the port address field for the hardware port number.
>
> This patch introduces new DT binding rules for coresight
> components, based on the same generic DT graph bindings, but
> avoiding the address duplication.
>
> - All output ports must be specified under a child node with
> name "out-ports".
> - All input ports must be specified under a childe node with
> name "in-ports".
> - Port address should match the hardware port number.
>
> The support for legacy bindings is retained, with a warning.
>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 91 ++++++++++----------
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
> index 8e21512..f39d2c6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
> @@ -104,19 +104,9 @@ The connections must be described via generic DT graph bindings as described
> by the "bindings/graph.txt", where each "port" along with an "endpoint"
> component represents a hardware port and the connection.
>
> -Since it is possible to have multiple connections for any coresight component
> -with a specific direction of data flow, each connection must define the
> -following properties to uniquely identify the connection details.
> -
> - * Direction of the data flow w.r.t the component :
> - Each input port must have the following property defined at the "endpoint"
> - for the port.
> - "slave-mode"
> -
> - * Hardware Port number at the component:
> - - The hardware port number is assumed to be the address of the "port"
> - component.
> -
Why do you add this in the previous patch and then remove it here?
> + * All output ports must be listed inside a child node named "out-ports"
> + * All input ports must be listed inside a child node named "in-ports".
> + * Port address must match the hardware port number.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-19 10:55 [PATCH v2 00/10] coresight: Update device tree bindings Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] coresight: Document error handling in coresight_register Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] coresight: platform: Refactor graph endpoint parsing Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-24 21:30 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-07-24 21:30 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-07-24 21:34 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-07-24 21:34 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-07-25 9:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-25 9:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-25 14:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-07-25 14:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] coresight: platform: Fix refcounting for graph nodes Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] coresight: platform: Fix leaking device reference Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] coresight: Fix remote endpoint parsing Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] coresight: Add helper to check if the endpoint is input Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] coresight: platform: Cleanup coresight connection handling Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] coresight: dts: Document usage of graph bindings Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] coresight: Cleanup coresight DT bindings Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-25 16:09 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-07-25 16:09 ` Rob Herring
2018-07-25 16:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-25 16:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-25 17:24 ` Rob Herring
2018-07-25 17:24 ` Rob Herring
2018-07-25 19:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-07-25 19:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] dts: juno: Update coresight bindings for hw port Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 11:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 11:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] dts: juno: Update coresight bindings Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-19 10:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180725160939.GA24323@rob-hp-laptop \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.