From: paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney)
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] rseq/selftests: add __rseq_abi misalignment check
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 07:09:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180806140947.GO24813@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patch.git-4d215e14e001.your-ad-here.call-01533561863-ext-2109@work.hours>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:27:23PM +0200, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> The kernel rseq syscall expects that struct rseq is 32 bytes aligned and
> returns EINVAL otherwise. Even though __rseq_abi is declared as static
> and proper aligned attribute is present __rseq_abi is a part of thread
> local storage. It turns out that on some platforms TLS itself is not
> properly aligned (at least for threads created), which is a glibc nptl
> bug and should be eventually fixed and backported. But in a meanwhile
> add __rseq_abi misalignment check, which would detect this situation
> and skip rseq test with some user friendly message.
>
> glibc bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor at linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> index 4847e97ed049..3de7f0e7442e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,24 @@ static int sys_rseq(volatile struct rseq *rseq_abi, uint32_t rseq_len,
> return syscall(__NR_rseq, rseq_abi, rseq_len, flags, sig);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * rseq syscall might fail on some platforms due to wrong alignment of TLS
> + * variables:
> + * https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403
> + *
> + * check if glibc bug is present and skip the test in this case
> + */
> +static void assert_rseq_abi_aligned(void)
> +{
> + if ((unsigned long)&__rseq_abi & (__alignof__(__rseq_abi) - 1)) {
> + fputs("__rseq_abi is not properly aligned, which is a known\n"
> + "glibc nptl bug (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403).\n"
> + "You need a fixed version of glibc to run this test.\n",
> + stderr);
> + exit(4); /* skip this test */
> + }
> +}
> +
> int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
> {
> int rc, ret = 0;
> @@ -72,6 +90,7 @@ int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
> signal_off_save(&oldset);
> if (refcount++)
> goto end;
> + assert_rseq_abi_aligned();
> rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq), 0, RSEQ_SIG);
> if (!rc) {
> assert(rseq_current_cpu_raw() >= 0);
> @@ -94,6 +113,7 @@ int rseq_unregister_current_thread(void)
> signal_off_save(&oldset);
> if (--refcount)
> goto end;
> + assert_rseq_abi_aligned();
> rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq),
> RSEQ_FLAG_UNREGISTER, RSEQ_SIG);
> if (!rc)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> index 3acd6d75ff9f..56caf5e3de3e 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ function do_tests()
> local i=0
> while [ "$i" -lt "${#TEST_LIST[@]}" ]; do
> echo "Running test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
> - ./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
> + ./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit $?
> echo "Running compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
> - ./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
> + ./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit $?
> let "i++"
> done
> }
> --
> 2.18.0.13.gd42ae10
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney)
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] rseq/selftests: add __rseq_abi misalignment check
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 07:09:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180806140947.GO24813@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180806140947.i4hZXioHWyEXpyzFYeCDb3lXguyTb89C_MXWbXeEylo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patch.git-4d215e14e001.your-ad-here.call-01533561863-ext-2109@work.hours>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018@03:27:23PM +0200, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> The kernel rseq syscall expects that struct rseq is 32 bytes aligned and
> returns EINVAL otherwise. Even though __rseq_abi is declared as static
> and proper aligned attribute is present __rseq_abi is a part of thread
> local storage. It turns out that on some platforms TLS itself is not
> properly aligned (at least for threads created), which is a glibc nptl
> bug and should be eventually fixed and backported. But in a meanwhile
> add __rseq_abi misalignment check, which would detect this situation
> and skip rseq test with some user friendly message.
>
> glibc bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor at linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> index 4847e97ed049..3de7f0e7442e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,24 @@ static int sys_rseq(volatile struct rseq *rseq_abi, uint32_t rseq_len,
> return syscall(__NR_rseq, rseq_abi, rseq_len, flags, sig);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * rseq syscall might fail on some platforms due to wrong alignment of TLS
> + * variables:
> + * https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403
> + *
> + * check if glibc bug is present and skip the test in this case
> + */
> +static void assert_rseq_abi_aligned(void)
> +{
> + if ((unsigned long)&__rseq_abi & (__alignof__(__rseq_abi) - 1)) {
> + fputs("__rseq_abi is not properly aligned, which is a known\n"
> + "glibc nptl bug (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403).\n"
> + "You need a fixed version of glibc to run this test.\n",
> + stderr);
> + exit(4); /* skip this test */
> + }
> +}
> +
> int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
> {
> int rc, ret = 0;
> @@ -72,6 +90,7 @@ int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
> signal_off_save(&oldset);
> if (refcount++)
> goto end;
> + assert_rseq_abi_aligned();
> rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq), 0, RSEQ_SIG);
> if (!rc) {
> assert(rseq_current_cpu_raw() >= 0);
> @@ -94,6 +113,7 @@ int rseq_unregister_current_thread(void)
> signal_off_save(&oldset);
> if (--refcount)
> goto end;
> + assert_rseq_abi_aligned();
> rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq),
> RSEQ_FLAG_UNREGISTER, RSEQ_SIG);
> if (!rc)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> index 3acd6d75ff9f..56caf5e3de3e 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ function do_tests()
> local i=0
> while [ "$i" -lt "${#TEST_LIST[@]}" ]; do
> echo "Running test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
> - ./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
> + ./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit $?
> echo "Running compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
> - ./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
> + ./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit $?
> let "i++"
> done
> }
> --
> 2.18.0.13.gd42ae10
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] rseq/selftests: add __rseq_abi misalignment check
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 07:09:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180806140947.GO24813@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patch.git-4d215e14e001.your-ad-here.call-01533561863-ext-2109@work.hours>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:27:23PM +0200, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> The kernel rseq syscall expects that struct rseq is 32 bytes aligned and
> returns EINVAL otherwise. Even though __rseq_abi is declared as static
> and proper aligned attribute is present __rseq_abi is a part of thread
> local storage. It turns out that on some platforms TLS itself is not
> properly aligned (at least for threads created), which is a glibc nptl
> bug and should be eventually fixed and backported. But in a meanwhile
> add __rseq_abi misalignment check, which would detect this situation
> and skip rseq test with some user friendly message.
>
> glibc bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> index 4847e97ed049..3de7f0e7442e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,24 @@ static int sys_rseq(volatile struct rseq *rseq_abi, uint32_t rseq_len,
> return syscall(__NR_rseq, rseq_abi, rseq_len, flags, sig);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * rseq syscall might fail on some platforms due to wrong alignment of TLS
> + * variables:
> + * https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403
> + *
> + * check if glibc bug is present and skip the test in this case
> + */
> +static void assert_rseq_abi_aligned(void)
> +{
> + if ((unsigned long)&__rseq_abi & (__alignof__(__rseq_abi) - 1)) {
> + fputs("__rseq_abi is not properly aligned, which is a known\n"
> + "glibc nptl bug (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403).\n"
> + "You need a fixed version of glibc to run this test.\n",
> + stderr);
> + exit(4); /* skip this test */
> + }
> +}
> +
> int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
> {
> int rc, ret = 0;
> @@ -72,6 +90,7 @@ int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
> signal_off_save(&oldset);
> if (refcount++)
> goto end;
> + assert_rseq_abi_aligned();
> rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq), 0, RSEQ_SIG);
> if (!rc) {
> assert(rseq_current_cpu_raw() >= 0);
> @@ -94,6 +113,7 @@ int rseq_unregister_current_thread(void)
> signal_off_save(&oldset);
> if (--refcount)
> goto end;
> + assert_rseq_abi_aligned();
> rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq),
> RSEQ_FLAG_UNREGISTER, RSEQ_SIG);
> if (!rc)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> index 3acd6d75ff9f..56caf5e3de3e 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
> @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ function do_tests()
> local i=0
> while [ "$i" -lt "${#TEST_LIST[@]}" ]; do
> echo "Running test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
> - ./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
> + ./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit $?
> echo "Running compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
> - ./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
> + ./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit $?
> let "i++"
> done
> }
> --
> 2.18.0.13.gd42ae10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-06 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-06 11:47 [PATCH 0/1] rseq/selftests: add __rseq_abi misalignment check gor
2018-08-06 11:47 ` Vasily Gorbik
2018-08-06 11:47 ` Vasily Gorbik
2018-08-06 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/1] " gor
2018-08-06 11:47 ` Vasily Gorbik
2018-08-06 11:47 ` Vasily Gorbik
2018-08-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 " gor
2018-08-06 13:27 ` Vasily Gorbik
2018-08-06 13:27 ` Vasily Gorbik
2018-08-06 14:09 ` paulmck [this message]
2018-08-06 14:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-06 14:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-07 22:22 ` [PATCH 0/1] " mathieu.desnoyers
2018-08-07 22:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-08-07 22:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180806140947.GO24813@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=unknown@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.