[Intel-wired-lan] e1000e driver stuck at 10Mbps after reconnection

[Camille Bordignon <camille.bordignon@easymile.com>]

Le lundi 06 ao?t 2018 ? 15:45:29 (-0700), Alexander Duyck a ?crit :
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:59 AM, Camille Bordignon
> <camille.bordignon@easymile.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently we experienced some issues with intel NIC (I219-LM and I219-V).
> > It seems that after a wire reconnection, auto-negotation "fails" and
> > link speed drips to 10 Mbps.
> >
> > From kernel logs:
> > [17616.346150] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Down
> > [17627.003322] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None
> > [17627.003325] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 enp0s31f6: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
> >
> >
> > $ethtool enp0s31f6
> > Settings for enp0s31f6:
> >         Supported ports: [ TP ]
> >         Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> >                                 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> >                                 1000baseT/Full
> >         Supported pause frame use: No
> >         Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
> >         Supported FEC modes: Not reported
> >         Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> >                                 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> >                                 1000baseT/Full
> >         Advertised pause frame use: No
> >         Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
> >         Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
> >         Speed: 10Mb/s
> >         Duplex: Full
> >         Port: Twisted Pair
> >         PHYAD: 1
> >         Transceiver: internal
> >         Auto-negotiation: on
> >         MDI-X: on (auto)
> >         Supports Wake-on: pumbg
> >         Wake-on: g
> >         Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
> >                                drv probe link
> >         Link detected: yes
> >
> >
> > Notice that if disconnection last less than about 5 seconds,
> > nothing wrong happens.
> > And if after last failure, disconnection / connection occurs again and
> > last less than 5 seconds, link speed is back to 1000 Mbps.
> >
> > [18075.350678] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Down
> > [18078.716245] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None
> >
> > The following patch seems to fix this issue.
> > However I don't clearly understand why.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > index 3ba0c90e7055..763c013960f1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > @@ -5069,7 +5069,7 @@ static bool e1000e_has_link(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> >         case e1000_media_type_copper:
> >                 if (hw->mac.get_link_status) {
> >                         ret_val = hw->mac.ops.check_for_link(hw);
> > -                       link_active = !hw->mac.get_link_status;
> > +                       link_active = false;
> >                 } else {
> >                         link_active = true;
> >                 }
> >
> > Maybe this is related to watchdog task.
> >
> > I've found out this fix by comparing with last commit that works fine :
> > commit 0b76aae741abb9d16d2c0e67f8b1e766576f897d.
> > However I don't know if this information is relevant.
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Camille Bordignon
> 
> What kernel were you testing this on? I know there have been a number
> of changes over the past few months in this area and it would be
> useful to know exactly what code base you started out with and what
> the latest version of the kernel is you have tested.
> 
> Looking over the code change the net effect of it should be to add a 2
> second delay from the time the link has changed until you actually
> check the speed/duplex configuration. It is possible we could be
> seeing some sort of timing issue and adding the 2 second delay after
> the link event is enough time for things to stabilize and detect the
> link at 1000 instead of 10/100.
> 
> - Alex

We've found out this issue using Fedora 27 (4.17.11-100.fc27.x86_64).

Then I've tested wth a more recent version of the driver v4.18-rc7 but
behavior looks the same.

Thanks for you reply.

Camille Bordignon