All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 23:31:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180809063124.GA26062@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533796003-680-6-git-send-email-alankao@andestech.com>

>  extern unsigned long elf_hwcap;
> +extern bool has_fpu;
>  #endif

Doesn't this conflict with the !CONFIG_CPU stub in switch_to.h?

It seems like we should only have this definition in one place to start
with.

Otherwise this looks fine to me:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Darius Rad <darius@bluespec.com>,
	greentime@andestech.com, vincentc@andestech.com,
	zong@andestech.com, nickhu@andestech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 23:31:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180809063124.GA26062@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533796003-680-6-git-send-email-alankao@andestech.com>

>  extern unsigned long elf_hwcap;
> +extern bool has_fpu;
>  #endif

Doesn't this conflict with the !CONFIG_CPU stub in switch_to.h?

It seems like we should only have this definition in one place to start
with.

Otherwise this looks fine to me:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-09  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-09  6:26 [PATCH v5 0/5] riscv: Add support to no-FPU systems Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26 ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] Extract FPU context operations from entry.S Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26   ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] Refactor FPU code in signal setup/return procedures Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26   ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] Cleanup ISA string setting Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26   ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] Allow to disable FPU support Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26   ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] Auto-detect whether a FPU exists Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:26   ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:31   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-08-09  6:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-09  6:43     ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  6:43       ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  7:02       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-09  7:02         ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-09  7:33         ` Alan Kao
2018-08-09  7:33           ` Alan Kao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180809063124.GA26062@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.