From: jacopo@jmondi.org (jacopo mondi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:46:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180816194651.GA30122@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <061a99d5-4fe6-795c-7e91-cf7127fb8472@axentia.se>
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 02:52:41PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-08-03 10:51, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:40:02AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> On 2018-08-03 10:11, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >>> Hi Peter!
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:23:07AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>>> With bus-type/bus-width properties in the endpoint nodes, the video-
> >>>> interface of the connection can be specified for cases where the
> >>>> heuristic fails to select the correct output mode. This can happen
> >>>> e.g. if not all RGB pins are routed on the PCB; the driver has no
> >>>> way of knowing this, and needs to be told explicitly.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is critical for the devices that have the "conflicting output
> >>>> formats" issue (SAM9N12, SAM9X5, SAMA5D3), since the most significant
> >>>> RGB bits move around depending on the selected output mode. For
> >>>> devices that do not have the "conflicting output formats" issue
> >>>> (SAMA5D2, SAMA5D4), this is completely irrelevant.
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> index 82f2acb3d374..9de434a8f523 100644
> >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ Required children nodes:
> >>>> to external devices using the OF graph reprensentation (see ../graph.txt).
> >>>> At least one port node is required.
> >>>>
> >>>> +Optional properties in grandchild nodes:
> >>>> + Any endpoint grandchild node may specify a desired video interface
> >>>> + according to ../../media/video-interfaces.txt, specifically
> >>>> + - bus-type: must be <0>.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any value in specifying this, if it has a fixed value to
> >>> "autodetect"? I understand it's optional, so if nobody else objects,
> >>> feels free to keep it there.
> >>
> >> That's just how media/video-interfaces.txt works.
> >>
> >> bus-type 0 means that other properties describe the bus type. In this
> >> case bus-width is specified, so that means a parallel bus. But bus-width
> >> has no meaning (or may not have) if bus-type is non-zero. But checking
> >> that bus-type for zero in the code seemed like overkill to me since the
> >> driver already knows that it is a parallel bus...
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, I felt like pointing that out since you're not cheking for its value,
> > and that property is only used by v4l2-fwnode to handle some
> > not-that-used-anymore bus as CCP2 is.
> >
> >> TL;DR I'd like to keep it.
> >>
> >
> > Fine with me then.
> >
> >>>
> >>>> + - bus-width: recognized values are <12>, <16>, <18> and <24>, and
> >>>> + override any output mode selection heuristic, forcing "rgb444",
> >>>> + "rgb565", "rgb666" and "rgb888" respectively.
> >>>> +
> >>>> Example:
> >>>>
> >>>> hlcdc: hlcdc at f0030000 {
> >>>> @@ -50,3 +58,21 @@ Example:
> >>>> #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >>>> };
> >>>> };
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Two blank lines here.
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +Example 2: With a video interface override to force rgb565; as above
> >>>> +but with these changes/additions:
> >>>> +
> >>>> + &hlcdc {
> >>>> + hlcdc-display-controller {
> >>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lcd_base &pinctrl_lcd_rgb565>;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + port at 0 {
> >>>
> >>> The node has a unit address specified, you're missing a reg = <0>
> >>> property (no big deal, it's an example, but the other one has it)
> >>>
> >>>> + hlcdc_panel_output: endpoint at 0 {
> >>>
> >>> Missing reg here too.
> >>
> >> I'll fix those (I think they appeared for the original example after I
> >> wrote the patch).
> >>
> >
> > Ok, then please consider also describing the port at 0 node cell sizes too
> > since it has a child endpoint node.
>
> Ok, I have now figured out why this was as it were, and I no longer agree
> with adding the extra properties. The whole of example 2 is inside a
> reference (using the &hlcdc notation) to the hlcdc node in example 1, and
> therefore these "missing" properties are not missing. I think they are
> just clutter that hides what is really needed/different between example 1
> and 2, and apparently Boris and Rob agreed when they acked/reviewed. The
> description of example 2 also clearly states that example 2 is changes
> and additions on top of example 1. So, I plan to have this in the next
> iteration:
>
> &hlcdc {
> hlcdc-display-controller {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lcd_base &pinctrl_lcd_rgb565>;
>
> port at 0 {
> hlcdc_panel_output: endpoint at 0 {
> bus-width = <16>;
Right, I thought that even when re-defining a node, reg properties
should be there, but yes, I had no reasons to think so :)
> };
> };
> };
> };
>
> Jacopo, please let me know if you want me to keep your review tag anyway...
>
Sure
>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>> Minors apart:
>
> ...because I interpret this to mean that I could add your tag if I made the
> changes you suggested. Or did it mean that I could add your tag regardless
> because the issues were minor?
>v
Sorry, I was not clear. That was a minor nit, you could have add my
tag anyhow.
Thanks
j
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> j
> >>>
> >>>> + bus-type = <0>;
> >>>> + bus-width = <16>;
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.11.0
> >>>>
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180816/3bf52c6a/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:46:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180816194651.GA30122@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <061a99d5-4fe6-795c-7e91-cf7127fb8472@axentia.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5870 bytes --]
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 02:52:41PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-08-03 10:51, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:40:02AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> On 2018-08-03 10:11, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >>> Hi Peter!
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:23:07AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>>> With bus-type/bus-width properties in the endpoint nodes, the video-
> >>>> interface of the connection can be specified for cases where the
> >>>> heuristic fails to select the correct output mode. This can happen
> >>>> e.g. if not all RGB pins are routed on the PCB; the driver has no
> >>>> way of knowing this, and needs to be told explicitly.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is critical for the devices that have the "conflicting output
> >>>> formats" issue (SAM9N12, SAM9X5, SAMA5D3), since the most significant
> >>>> RGB bits move around depending on the selected output mode. For
> >>>> devices that do not have the "conflicting output formats" issue
> >>>> (SAMA5D2, SAMA5D4), this is completely irrelevant.
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> index 82f2acb3d374..9de434a8f523 100644
> >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ Required children nodes:
> >>>> to external devices using the OF graph reprensentation (see ../graph.txt).
> >>>> At least one port node is required.
> >>>>
> >>>> +Optional properties in grandchild nodes:
> >>>> + Any endpoint grandchild node may specify a desired video interface
> >>>> + according to ../../media/video-interfaces.txt, specifically
> >>>> + - bus-type: must be <0>.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any value in specifying this, if it has a fixed value to
> >>> "autodetect"? I understand it's optional, so if nobody else objects,
> >>> feels free to keep it there.
> >>
> >> That's just how media/video-interfaces.txt works.
> >>
> >> bus-type 0 means that other properties describe the bus type. In this
> >> case bus-width is specified, so that means a parallel bus. But bus-width
> >> has no meaning (or may not have) if bus-type is non-zero. But checking
> >> that bus-type for zero in the code seemed like overkill to me since the
> >> driver already knows that it is a parallel bus...
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, I felt like pointing that out since you're not cheking for its value,
> > and that property is only used by v4l2-fwnode to handle some
> > not-that-used-anymore bus as CCP2 is.
> >
> >> TL;DR I'd like to keep it.
> >>
> >
> > Fine with me then.
> >
> >>>
> >>>> + - bus-width: recognized values are <12>, <16>, <18> and <24>, and
> >>>> + override any output mode selection heuristic, forcing "rgb444",
> >>>> + "rgb565", "rgb666" and "rgb888" respectively.
> >>>> +
> >>>> Example:
> >>>>
> >>>> hlcdc: hlcdc@f0030000 {
> >>>> @@ -50,3 +58,21 @@ Example:
> >>>> #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >>>> };
> >>>> };
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Two blank lines here.
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +Example 2: With a video interface override to force rgb565; as above
> >>>> +but with these changes/additions:
> >>>> +
> >>>> + &hlcdc {
> >>>> + hlcdc-display-controller {
> >>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lcd_base &pinctrl_lcd_rgb565>;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + port@0 {
> >>>
> >>> The node has a unit address specified, you're missing a reg = <0>
> >>> property (no big deal, it's an example, but the other one has it)
> >>>
> >>>> + hlcdc_panel_output: endpoint@0 {
> >>>
> >>> Missing reg here too.
> >>
> >> I'll fix those (I think they appeared for the original example after I
> >> wrote the patch).
> >>
> >
> > Ok, then please consider also describing the port@0 node cell sizes too
> > since it has a child endpoint node.
>
> Ok, I have now figured out why this was as it were, and I no longer agree
> with adding the extra properties. The whole of example 2 is inside a
> reference (using the &hlcdc notation) to the hlcdc node in example 1, and
> therefore these "missing" properties are not missing. I think they are
> just clutter that hides what is really needed/different between example 1
> and 2, and apparently Boris and Rob agreed when they acked/reviewed. The
> description of example 2 also clearly states that example 2 is changes
> and additions on top of example 1. So, I plan to have this in the next
> iteration:
>
> &hlcdc {
> hlcdc-display-controller {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lcd_base &pinctrl_lcd_rgb565>;
>
> port@0 {
> hlcdc_panel_output: endpoint@0 {
> bus-width = <16>;
Right, I thought that even when re-defining a node, reg properties
should be there, but yes, I had no reasons to think so :)
> };
> };
> };
> };
>
> Jacopo, please let me know if you want me to keep your review tag anyway...
>
Sure
>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>> Minors apart:
>
> ...because I interpret this to mean that I could add your tag if I made the
> changes you suggested. Or did it mean that I could add your tag regardless
> because the issues were minor?
>v
Sorry, I was not clear. That was a minor nit, you could have add my
tag anyhow.
Thanks
j
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> j
> >>>
> >>>> + bus-type = <0>;
> >>>> + bus-width = <16>;
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.11.0
> >>>>
> >>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-16 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 7:23 [RESEND PATCH v5 0/3] drm/atmel-hlcdc: bus-width override support Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:23 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-transmitter: add ti, ds90c185 Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-transmitter: add ti,ds90c185 Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:23 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:11 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:11 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:40 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:40 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:51 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:51 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:51 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-16 12:52 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-16 12:52 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-16 19:46 ` jacopo mondi [this message]
2018-08-16 19:46 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-08-03 8:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-08-03 8:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-08-03 7:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 3/3] drm/atmel-hlcdc: support bus-width (12/16/18/24) in endpoint nodes Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:23 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:17 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:17 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:17 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:25 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:25 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:25 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 0/3] drm/atmel-hlcdc: bus-width override support Boris Brezillon
2018-08-03 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-03 7:30 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180816194651.GA30122@w540 \
--to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.