All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:59:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824105939.24fe8013@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824085501.9740-2-peda@axentia.se>

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:55:00 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:

> If the divider used to get the pixel-clock is small, the granularity
> of the frequencies possible for the pixel-clock is quite coarse. E.g.
> requesting a pixel-clock of 65MHz with a sys_clk of 132MHz results
> in the divider being set to 3 ending up with 44MHz.
> 
> By preferring the doubled sys_clk as base, the divider instead ends
> up as 5 yielding a pixel-clock of 52.8Mhz, which is a definite
> improvement.
> 
> While at it, clamp the divider so that it does not overflow in case
> it gets big.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> index c38a479ada98..71c9cd90d2ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -101,18 +101,22 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
>  		     (adj->crtc_hdisplay - 1) |
>  		     ((adj->crtc_vdisplay - 1) << 16));
>  
> -	cfg = 0;
> +	cfg = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
>  
> -	prate = clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
> +	prate = 2 * clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
>  	mode_rate = adj->crtc_clock * 1000;
> -	if ((prate / 2) < mode_rate) {
> -		prate *= 2;
> -		cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> -	}
>  
>  	div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
>  	if (div < 2)
>  		div = 2;

I'm nitpicking, but can you add braces around the if() block?

Looks good otherwise.

> +	else if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK) {
> +		/* the divider ended up too big, try a lower base rate */
> +		cfg &= ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> +		prate /= 2;
> +		div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
> +		if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK)
> +			div = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK;
> +	}
>  
>  	cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div);
>  

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:59:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824105939.24fe8013@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824085501.9740-2-peda@axentia.se>

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:55:00 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:

> If the divider used to get the pixel-clock is small, the granularity
> of the frequencies possible for the pixel-clock is quite coarse. E.g.
> requesting a pixel-clock of 65MHz with a sys_clk of 132MHz results
> in the divider being set to 3 ending up with 44MHz.
> 
> By preferring the doubled sys_clk as base, the divider instead ends
> up as 5 yielding a pixel-clock of 52.8Mhz, which is a definite
> improvement.
> 
> While at it, clamp the divider so that it does not overflow in case
> it gets big.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> index c38a479ada98..71c9cd90d2ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -101,18 +101,22 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
>  		     (adj->crtc_hdisplay - 1) |
>  		     ((adj->crtc_vdisplay - 1) << 16));
>  
> -	cfg = 0;
> +	cfg = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
>  
> -	prate = clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
> +	prate = 2 * clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
>  	mode_rate = adj->crtc_clock * 1000;
> -	if ((prate / 2) < mode_rate) {
> -		prate *= 2;
> -		cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> -	}
>  
>  	div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
>  	if (div < 2)
>  		div = 2;

I'm nitpicking, but can you add braces around the if() block?

Looks good otherwise.

> +	else if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK) {
> +		/* the divider ended up too big, try a lower base rate */
> +		cfg &= ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> +		prate /= 2;
> +		div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
> +		if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK)
> +			div = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK;
> +	}
>  
>  	cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div);
>  

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:59:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824105939.24fe8013@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824085501.9740-2-peda@axentia.se>

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:55:00 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:

> If the divider used to get the pixel-clock is small, the granularity
> of the frequencies possible for the pixel-clock is quite coarse. E.g.
> requesting a pixel-clock of 65MHz with a sys_clk of 132MHz results
> in the divider being set to 3 ending up with 44MHz.
> 
> By preferring the doubled sys_clk as base, the divider instead ends
> up as 5 yielding a pixel-clock of 52.8Mhz, which is a definite
> improvement.
> 
> While at it, clamp the divider so that it does not overflow in case
> it gets big.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> index c38a479ada98..71c9cd90d2ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -101,18 +101,22 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
>  		     (adj->crtc_hdisplay - 1) |
>  		     ((adj->crtc_vdisplay - 1) << 16));
>  
> -	cfg = 0;
> +	cfg = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
>  
> -	prate = clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
> +	prate = 2 * clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
>  	mode_rate = adj->crtc_clock * 1000;
> -	if ((prate / 2) < mode_rate) {
> -		prate *= 2;
> -		cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> -	}
>  
>  	div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
>  	if (div < 2)
>  		div = 2;

I'm nitpicking, but can you add braces around the if() block?

Looks good otherwise.

> +	else if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK) {
> +		/* the divider ended up too big, try a lower base rate */
> +		cfg &= ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> +		prate /= 2;
> +		div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
> +		if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK)
> +			div = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK;
> +	}
>  
>  	cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div);
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-24  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-24  8:54 [PATCH 0/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: revise selection of pixel-clock frequency divider Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  8:54 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  8:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  8:55   ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  8:59   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-08-24  8:59     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-24  8:59     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-24  8:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock that requested Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  8:55   ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  9:07   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-24  9:07     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-24  9:07     ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180824105939.24fe8013@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.