All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: core: phy: fix return value checking about devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 11:41:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180831094154.GL28861@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <626cea85395e3a1f002ef0a241bb508d770a33c0.1535536218.git.chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:16:40AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL() because devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
> never return NULL value;
> But still need ignore the error of -ENODEV, for more information, please
> refer to:
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/19/88
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10160181/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> ---
> V3: abandon the ternary operator suggested by Johan
> 
> V2: keep the -ENODEV check

Perhaps the patch Subject is a little misleading as this is more of a
clean up than a fix (as there's no bug here).

But apart from that this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/phy.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> index 9879767..38b2c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
>  				   struct list_head *list)
>  {
>  	struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> -	struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> +	struct phy *phy;
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> -		if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> +	phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> +	if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
>  			return 0;
>  		else
>  			return PTR_ERR(phy);

Thanks,
Johan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [v3] usb: core: phy: fix return value checking about devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 11:41:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180831094154.GL28861@localhost> (raw)

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:16:40AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL() because devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
> never return NULL value;
> But still need ignore the error of -ENODEV, for more information, please
> refer to:
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/19/88
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10160181/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> ---
> V3: abandon the ternary operator suggested by Johan
> 
> V2: keep the -ENODEV check

Perhaps the patch Subject is a little misleading as this is more of a
clean up than a fix (as there's no bug here).

But apart from that this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/phy.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> index 9879767..38b2c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
>  				   struct list_head *list)
>  {
>  	struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> -	struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> +	struct phy *phy;
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> -		if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> +	phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> +	if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
>  			return 0;
>  		else
>  			return PTR_ERR(phy);

Thanks,
Johan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: johan@kernel.org (Johan Hovold)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] usb: core: phy: fix return value checking about devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 11:41:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180831094154.GL28861@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <626cea85395e3a1f002ef0a241bb508d770a33c0.1535536218.git.chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:16:40AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL() because devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
> never return NULL value;
> But still need ignore the error of -ENODEV, for more information, please
> refer to:
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/19/88
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10160181/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> ---
> V3: abandon the ternary operator suggested by Johan
> 
> V2: keep the -ENODEV check

Perhaps the patch Subject is a little misleading as this is more of a
clean up than a fix (as there's no bug here).

But apart from that this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/phy.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> index 9879767..38b2c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
>  				   struct list_head *list)
>  {
>  	struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> -	struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> +	struct phy *phy;
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> -		if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> +	phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> +	if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
>  			return 0;
>  		else
>  			return PTR_ERR(phy);

Thanks,
Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-31  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-30  1:16 [PATCH v3] usb: core: phy: fix return value checking about devm_of_phy_get_by_index() Chunfeng Yun
2018-08-30  1:16 ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-08-30  1:16 ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-08-30  1:16 ` [v3] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-08-31  9:41 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2018-08-31  9:41   ` [PATCH v3] " Johan Hovold
2018-08-31  9:41   ` [v3] " Johan Hovold
2018-08-31 10:03   ` [PATCH v3] " Chunfeng Yun
2018-08-31 10:03     ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-08-31 10:03     ` Chunfeng Yun
2018-08-31 10:03     ` [v3] " Chunfeng Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180831094154.GL28861@localhost \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.