From: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
hverkuil@xs4all.nl, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
mchehab@kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 09:22:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180903072234.GA4116@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180831122558.zv7537uyfw5pcnqj@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1557 bytes --]
Hi Sakari,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Hello,
> > this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based
> > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one
> > sensor driver used by one of those boards.
> >
> > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know
> > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework.
>
> What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU
> driver is the last using SoC camera framework.
>
There's an open comment from Geert on this series.
I'll resend, then I guess it can be collected.
> I guess an ack from the SH folks would be needed for these patches to go
> through the media tree.
>
I would have loved to hear from them on this and other media patches
which are sh-related. It hasn't happen, and as for the previous patches
removing usage of the old ceu driver for SH boards, I guess this can go in
through the media tree. But I let Hans decide how to handle this.
> On the sensor driver patches --- please just move the files. The CEU was
> the last that it was possible to use the drivers with.
>
My understanding was that Hans preferred to do it after all
dependencies are moved away from soc_camera.
Maybe at ELC-E we should have a status-check and decide how to move
forward with soc_camera deprecation.
Thanks
j
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
> e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
hverkuil@xs4all.nl, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
mchehab@kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 07:22:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180903072234.GA4116@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180831122558.zv7537uyfw5pcnqj@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1557 bytes --]
Hi Sakari,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Hello,
> > this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based
> > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one
> > sensor driver used by one of those boards.
> >
> > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know
> > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework.
>
> What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU
> driver is the last using SoC camera framework.
>
There's an open comment from Geert on this series.
I'll resend, then I guess it can be collected.
> I guess an ack from the SH folks would be needed for these patches to go
> through the media tree.
>
I would have loved to hear from them on this and other media patches
which are sh-related. It hasn't happen, and as for the previous patches
removing usage of the old ceu driver for SH boards, I guess this can go in
through the media tree. But I let Hans decide how to handle this.
> On the sensor driver patches --- please just move the files. The CEU was
> the last that it was possible to use the drivers with.
>
My understanding was that Hans preferred to do it after all
dependencies are moved away from soc_camera.
Maybe at ELC-E we should have a status-check and decide how to move
forward with soc_camera deprecation.
Thanks
j
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
> e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-03 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-28 16:37 [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] media: i2c: Copy rj54n1cb0c soc_camera sensor driver Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] media: i2c: rj54n1: Remove soc_camera dependencies Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] arch: sh: kfr2r09: Use new renesas-ceu camera driver Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-29 7:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-29 7:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-31 2:48 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-31 2:48 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] arch: sh: ms7724se: " Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] arch: sh: ap325rxa: " Jacopo Mondi
2018-05-28 16:37 ` Jacopo Mondi
2018-08-31 12:25 ` [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh Sakari Ailus
2018-08-31 12:25 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-09-03 7:22 ` jacopo mondi [this message]
2018-09-03 7:22 ` jacopo mondi
2018-09-04 9:33 ` jacopo mondi
2018-09-04 9:33 ` jacopo mondi
2018-09-04 9:43 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-09-04 9:43 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-09-04 10:04 ` jacopo mondi
2018-09-04 10:04 ` jacopo mondi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180903072234.GA4116@w540 \
--to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.