All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Alban Bedel <albeu@free.fr>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/16] nvmem: resolve cells from DT at registration time
Date: Fri,  7 Sep 2018 12:07:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180907100750.14564-13-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180907100750.14564-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

Currently we're creating a new cell structure everytime a DT users
calls nvmem_cell_get().

Change this behavior by resolving the cells during nvmem provider
registration and adding all cells to the provider's list. Make
of_nvmem_cell_get() just parse the phandle and look the cell up
in the relevant provider's list.

Don't drop the cell in nvmem_cell_put().

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/nvmem/core.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 854baa0559a1..da7a9d5beb33 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -405,6 +405,73 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_list(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
 	return rval;
 }
 
+static struct nvmem_cell *
+nvmem_find_cell_by_index(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, int index)
+{
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&nvmem_mutex);
+	list_for_each_entry(cell, &nvmem->cells, node) {
+		if (index == i++)
+			break;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&nvmem_mutex);
+
+	return cell;
+}
+
+static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
+{
+	struct device_node *parent, *child;
+	struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+	const __be32 *addr;
+	int len;
+
+	parent = dev->of_node;
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) {
+		addr = of_get_property(child, "reg", &len);
+		if (!addr || (len < 2 * sizeof(u32))) {
+			dev_err(dev, "nvmem: invalid reg on %pOF\n", child);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		cell = kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!cell)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		cell->nvmem = nvmem;
+		cell->offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
+		cell->bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+		cell->name = child->name;
+
+		addr = of_get_property(child, "bits", &len);
+		if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
+			cell->bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
+			cell->nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+		}
+
+		if (cell->nbits)
+			cell->bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(
+					cell->nbits + cell->bit_offset,
+					BITS_PER_BYTE);
+
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) {
+			dev_err(dev, "cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n",
+				cell->name, nvmem->stride);
+			/* Cells already added will be freed later. */
+			kfree(cell);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		nvmem_cell_add(cell);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * nvmem_register_notifier() - Register a notifier block for nvmem events.
  *
@@ -514,6 +581,9 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
 	rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_list(nvmem);
 	if (rval)
 		goto err_teardown_compat;
+	rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_of(nvmem);
+	if (rval)
+		goto err_remove_cells;
 
 	rval = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&nvmem_notifier, NVMEM_ADD, nvmem);
 	if (rval)
@@ -811,10 +881,8 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(struct device_node *np,
 					    const char *name)
 {
 	struct device_node *cell_np, *nvmem_np;
-	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
 	struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
-	const __be32 *addr;
-	int rval, len;
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
 	int index = 0;
 
 	/* if cell name exists, find index to the name */
@@ -834,54 +902,13 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(struct device_node *np,
 	if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
 		return ERR_CAST(nvmem);
 
-	addr = of_get_property(cell_np, "reg", &len);
-	if (!addr || (len < 2 * sizeof(u32))) {
-		dev_err(&nvmem->dev, "nvmem: invalid reg on %pOF\n",
-			cell_np);
-		rval  = -EINVAL;
-		goto err_mem;
-	}
-
-	cell = kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
+	cell = nvmem_find_cell_by_index(nvmem, index);
 	if (!cell) {
-		rval = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err_mem;
-	}
-
-	cell->nvmem = nvmem;
-	cell->offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
-	cell->bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
-	cell->name = cell_np->name;
-
-	addr = of_get_property(cell_np, "bits", &len);
-	if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
-		cell->bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
-		cell->nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
-	}
-
-	if (cell->nbits)
-		cell->bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(cell->nbits + cell->bit_offset,
-					   BITS_PER_BYTE);
-
-	if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) {
-			dev_err(&nvmem->dev,
-				"cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n",
-				cell->name, nvmem->stride);
-		rval  = -EINVAL;
-		goto err_sanity;
+		__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 	}
 
-	nvmem_cell_add(cell);
-
 	return cell;
-
-err_sanity:
-	kfree(cell);
-
-err_mem:
-	__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
-
-	return ERR_PTR(rval);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_nvmem_cell_get);
 #endif
@@ -978,7 +1005,6 @@ void nvmem_cell_put(struct nvmem_cell *cell)
 	struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
 
 	__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
-	nvmem_cell_drop(cell);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_put);
 
-- 
2.18.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: brgl@bgdev.pl (Bartosz Golaszewski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/16] nvmem: resolve cells from DT at registration time
Date: Fri,  7 Sep 2018 12:07:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180907100750.14564-13-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180907100750.14564-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

Currently we're creating a new cell structure everytime a DT users
calls nvmem_cell_get().

Change this behavior by resolving the cells during nvmem provider
registration and adding all cells to the provider's list. Make
of_nvmem_cell_get() just parse the phandle and look the cell up
in the relevant provider's list.

Don't drop the cell in nvmem_cell_put().

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/nvmem/core.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 854baa0559a1..da7a9d5beb33 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -405,6 +405,73 @@ static int nvmem_add_cells_from_list(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
 	return rval;
 }
 
+static struct nvmem_cell *
+nvmem_find_cell_by_index(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, int index)
+{
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&nvmem_mutex);
+	list_for_each_entry(cell, &nvmem->cells, node) {
+		if (index == i++)
+			break;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&nvmem_mutex);
+
+	return cell;
+}
+
+static int nvmem_add_cells_from_of(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
+{
+	struct device_node *parent, *child;
+	struct device *dev = &nvmem->dev;
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+	const __be32 *addr;
+	int len;
+
+	parent = dev->of_node;
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) {
+		addr = of_get_property(child, "reg", &len);
+		if (!addr || (len < 2 * sizeof(u32))) {
+			dev_err(dev, "nvmem: invalid reg on %pOF\n", child);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		cell = kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!cell)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		cell->nvmem = nvmem;
+		cell->offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
+		cell->bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+		cell->name = child->name;
+
+		addr = of_get_property(child, "bits", &len);
+		if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
+			cell->bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
+			cell->nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
+		}
+
+		if (cell->nbits)
+			cell->bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(
+					cell->nbits + cell->bit_offset,
+					BITS_PER_BYTE);
+
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) {
+			dev_err(dev, "cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n",
+				cell->name, nvmem->stride);
+			/* Cells already added will be freed later. */
+			kfree(cell);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		nvmem_cell_add(cell);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * nvmem_register_notifier() - Register a notifier block for nvmem events.
  *
@@ -514,6 +581,9 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
 	rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_list(nvmem);
 	if (rval)
 		goto err_teardown_compat;
+	rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_of(nvmem);
+	if (rval)
+		goto err_remove_cells;
 
 	rval = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&nvmem_notifier, NVMEM_ADD, nvmem);
 	if (rval)
@@ -811,10 +881,8 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(struct device_node *np,
 					    const char *name)
 {
 	struct device_node *cell_np, *nvmem_np;
-	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
 	struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
-	const __be32 *addr;
-	int rval, len;
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
 	int index = 0;
 
 	/* if cell name exists, find index to the name */
@@ -834,54 +902,13 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(struct device_node *np,
 	if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
 		return ERR_CAST(nvmem);
 
-	addr = of_get_property(cell_np, "reg", &len);
-	if (!addr || (len < 2 * sizeof(u32))) {
-		dev_err(&nvmem->dev, "nvmem: invalid reg on %pOF\n",
-			cell_np);
-		rval  = -EINVAL;
-		goto err_mem;
-	}
-
-	cell = kzalloc(sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
+	cell = nvmem_find_cell_by_index(nvmem, index);
 	if (!cell) {
-		rval = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err_mem;
-	}
-
-	cell->nvmem = nvmem;
-	cell->offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
-	cell->bytes = be32_to_cpup(addr);
-	cell->name = cell_np->name;
-
-	addr = of_get_property(cell_np, "bits", &len);
-	if (addr && len == (2 * sizeof(u32))) {
-		cell->bit_offset = be32_to_cpup(addr++);
-		cell->nbits = be32_to_cpup(addr);
-	}
-
-	if (cell->nbits)
-		cell->bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(cell->nbits + cell->bit_offset,
-					   BITS_PER_BYTE);
-
-	if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) {
-			dev_err(&nvmem->dev,
-				"cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n",
-				cell->name, nvmem->stride);
-		rval  = -EINVAL;
-		goto err_sanity;
+		__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 	}
 
-	nvmem_cell_add(cell);
-
 	return cell;
-
-err_sanity:
-	kfree(cell);
-
-err_mem:
-	__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
-
-	return ERR_PTR(rval);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_nvmem_cell_get);
 #endif
@@ -978,7 +1005,6 @@ void nvmem_cell_put(struct nvmem_cell *cell)
 	struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
 
 	__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
-	nvmem_cell_drop(cell);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_put);
 
-- 
2.18.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 10:07 [PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] nvmem: remove unused APIs Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  7:32   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  7:32     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  7:58     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  7:58       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  8:09       ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  8:09         ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  8:43         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  8:43           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  9:55           ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  9:55             ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10 11:31             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10 11:31               ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10 11:47               ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10 11:47                 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10 12:18                 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10 12:18                   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10 12:22                   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10 12:22                     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10 13:23                     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10 13:23                       ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] nvmem: remove the global cell list Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] nvmem: use kref Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] nvmem: lpc18xx_eeprom: use devm_nvmem_register() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] nvmem: sunxi_sid: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] nvmem: mxs-ocotp: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] nvmem: change the signature of nvmem_unregister() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  7:33   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  7:33     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] nvmem: provide nvmem_dev_name() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] nvmem: remove the name field from struct nvmem_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] nvmem: add a notifier chain Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] nvmem: add support for cell info Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  7:32   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  7:32     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  7:36     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10  7:36       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10  8:53       ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  8:53         ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-07 10:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2018-09-07 10:07   ` [PATCH v2 12/16] nvmem: resolve cells from DT at registration time Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] nvmem: add support for cell lookups from machine code Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  7:32   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  7:32     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  8:17     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  8:17       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  8:23       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10  8:23         ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10  8:55         ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  8:55           ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  9:45           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  9:45             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  9:49             ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10  9:49               ` Boris Brezillon
2018-09-10  9:50             ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  9:50               ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10 11:26               ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10 11:26                 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] Documentation: nvmem: document cell tables and lookup entries Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] nvmem: use SPDX license identifiers Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] nvmem: make the naming of arguments in nvmem_cell_get() consistent Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-07 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  7:54 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  7:54   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10  8:24   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10  8:24     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10 10:02     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10 10:02       ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-09-10 14:58       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-09-10 14:58         ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180907100750.14564-13-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=albeu@free.fr \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.