All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	guohanjun@huawei.com, huawei.libin@huawei.com,
	john.garry@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for non-strict mode
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 18:10:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918171016.GL16498@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f9444c7224ea0e6e4cef8ddbf77bb5292a383e3.1536935328.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> 
> Dynamically choose strict or non-strict mode for page table config based
> on the iommu domain type.

It's the domain type in conjunction with the attribute that determines
whether we use lazy or strict invalidation.

> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> [rm: convert to domain attribute]
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index f10c852479fc..7bbfa5f7ce8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
>  	struct mutex			init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */
>  
>  	struct io_pgtable_ops		*pgtbl_ops;
> +	bool				non_strict;
>  
>  	enum arm_smmu_domain_stage	stage;
>  	union {
> @@ -1633,6 +1634,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY)
>  		pgtbl_cfg.quirks = IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_DMA;
>  
> +	if (smmu_domain->non_strict)
> +		pgtbl_cfg.quirks |= IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT;
> +
>  	pgtbl_ops = alloc_io_pgtable_ops(fmt, &pgtbl_cfg, smmu_domain);
>  	if (!pgtbl_ops)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1934,13 +1938,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>  
> -	if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	switch (attr) {
>  	case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING:
> +		if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> +			return -EINVAL;
>  		*(int *)data = (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED);
>  		return 0;
> +	case DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE:
> +		if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		*(int *)data = smmu_domain->non_strict;
> +		return 0;
>  	default:
>  		return -ENODEV;

Hmm, there's a change in behaviour here (and also in the set function)
which is that unknown attributes now return -ENODEV for managed domains
instead of -EINVAL. I don't know if that's a problem, but I'd be inclined
to switch on the domain type and then have a nested switch for the supported
attributes.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for non-strict mode
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 18:10:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918171016.GL16498@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f9444c7224ea0e6e4cef8ddbf77bb5292a383e3.1536935328.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> 
> Dynamically choose strict or non-strict mode for page table config based
> on the iommu domain type.

It's the domain type in conjunction with the attribute that determines
whether we use lazy or strict invalidation.

> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> [rm: convert to domain attribute]
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index f10c852479fc..7bbfa5f7ce8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
>  	struct mutex			init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */
>  
>  	struct io_pgtable_ops		*pgtbl_ops;
> +	bool				non_strict;
>  
>  	enum arm_smmu_domain_stage	stage;
>  	union {
> @@ -1633,6 +1634,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY)
>  		pgtbl_cfg.quirks = IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_DMA;
>  
> +	if (smmu_domain->non_strict)
> +		pgtbl_cfg.quirks |= IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT;
> +
>  	pgtbl_ops = alloc_io_pgtable_ops(fmt, &pgtbl_cfg, smmu_domain);
>  	if (!pgtbl_ops)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1934,13 +1938,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>  
> -	if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	switch (attr) {
>  	case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING:
> +		if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> +			return -EINVAL;
>  		*(int *)data = (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED);
>  		return 0;
> +	case DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE:
> +		if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		*(int *)data = smmu_domain->non_strict;
> +		return 0;
>  	default:
>  		return -ENODEV;

Hmm, there's a change in behaviour here (and also in the set function)
which is that unknown attributes now return -ENODEV for managed domains
instead of -EINVAL. I don't know if that's a problem, but I'd be inclined
to switch on the domain type and then have a nested switch for the supported
attributes.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-18 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-14 14:30 [PATCH v7 0/6] Add non-strict mode support for iommu-dma Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30 ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement flush_iotlb_all hook Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] iommu/dma: Add support for non-strict mode Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 17:10   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-18 17:10     ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <20180918171007.GJ16498-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-18 18:52       ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 18:52         ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 18:52         ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: " Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] iommu: Add bootup option "iommu.non_strict" Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 17:10   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-18 17:10     ` Will Deacon
2018-09-18 19:01     ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 19:01       ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for non-strict mode Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 17:10   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-09-18 17:10     ` Will Deacon
2018-09-18 19:09     ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 19:09       ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Support " Robin Murphy
2018-09-14 14:30   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 17:10   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-18 17:10     ` Will Deacon
2018-09-18 19:22     ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 19:22       ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 17:10 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] Add non-strict mode support for iommu-dma Will Deacon
2018-09-18 17:10   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-18 18:28   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-18 18:28     ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180918171016.GL16498@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.