From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Jan Kundrát" <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Russell King" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: mvebu: Fix PCI I/O mapping creation sequence
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 15:01:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181001140137.GA13049@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181001124934.7222-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:49:34PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Commit ee1604381a371 ("PCI: mvebu: Only remap I/O space if
> configured") had the side effect that the PCI I/O mapping was created
> much earlier than before, at a point where the probe() of the driver
> could still fail. This is for example a problem if one gets an
> -EPROBE_DEFER at some point during probe(), after pci_ioremap_io() has
> been called.
>
> Indeed, there is currently no function to undo what pci_ioremap_io()
> did, and switching to pci_remap_iospace() is not an option in
> pci-mvebu due to the need for special memory attributes on Armada 38x.
>
> Reverting ee1604381a371 ("PCI: mvebu: Only remap I/O space if
> configured") would be a possibility, but it would require also
> reverting 42342073e38b5 ("PCI: mvebu: Convert to use pci_host_bridge
> directly"). So instead, we use an open-coded version of
> pci_host_probe() that creates the PCI I/O mapping at a point where we
> are guaranteed not to fail anymore.
>
> Reported-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
> Fixes: ee1604381a371 ("PCI: mvebu: Only remap I/O space if configured")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Thank you Thomas.
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Bjorn, is it possible please to send this patch for -rc7 ? It is
a regression we introduced in the last cycle.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> index 50eb0729385b..a41d79b8d46a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -1145,7 +1145,6 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pcie->pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> - unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcie->resources);
> @@ -1179,13 +1178,58 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie)
> resource_size(&pcie->io) - 1);
> pcie->realio.name = "PCI I/O";
>
> + pci_add_resource(&pcie->resources, &pcie->realio);
> + }
> +
> + return devm_request_pci_bus_resources(dev, &pcie->resources);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This is a copy of pci_host_probe(), except that it does the I/O
> + * remap as the last step, once we are sure we won't fail.
> + *
> + * It should be removed once the I/O remap error handling issue has
> + * been sorted out.
> + */
> +static int mvebu_pci_host_probe(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_pcie *pcie;
> + struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(bridge);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(bridge->dev.parent, "Scanning root bridge failed");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
> + if (resource_size(&pcie->io) != 0) {
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < resource_size(&pcie->realio); i += SZ_64K)
> pci_ioremap_io(i, pcie->io.start + i);
> + }
>
> - pci_add_resource(&pcie->resources, &pcie->realio);
> + bus = bridge->bus;
> +
> + /*
> + * We insert PCI resources into the iomem_resource and
> + * ioport_resource trees in either pci_bus_claim_resources()
> + * or pci_bus_assign_resources().
> + */
> + if (pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> + pci_bus_claim_resources(bus);
> + } else {
> + pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
> + pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
> + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> }
>
> - return devm_request_pci_bus_resources(dev, &pcie->resources);
> + pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -1268,7 +1312,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> bridge->align_resource = mvebu_pcie_align_resource;
> bridge->msi = pcie->msi;
>
> - return pci_host_probe(bridge);
> + return mvebu_pci_host_probe(bridge);
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id mvebu_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
> --
> 2.14.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: mvebu: Fix PCI I/O mapping creation sequence
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 15:01:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181001140137.GA13049@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181001124934.7222-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:49:34PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Commit ee1604381a371 ("PCI: mvebu: Only remap I/O space if
> configured") had the side effect that the PCI I/O mapping was created
> much earlier than before, at a point where the probe() of the driver
> could still fail. This is for example a problem if one gets an
> -EPROBE_DEFER at some point during probe(), after pci_ioremap_io() has
> been called.
>
> Indeed, there is currently no function to undo what pci_ioremap_io()
> did, and switching to pci_remap_iospace() is not an option in
> pci-mvebu due to the need for special memory attributes on Armada 38x.
>
> Reverting ee1604381a371 ("PCI: mvebu: Only remap I/O space if
> configured") would be a possibility, but it would require also
> reverting 42342073e38b5 ("PCI: mvebu: Convert to use pci_host_bridge
> directly"). So instead, we use an open-coded version of
> pci_host_probe() that creates the PCI I/O mapping at a point where we
> are guaranteed not to fail anymore.
>
> Reported-by: Jan Kundr?t <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
> Fixes: ee1604381a371 ("PCI: mvebu: Only remap I/O space if configured")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Thank you Thomas.
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Bjorn, is it possible please to send this patch for -rc7 ? It is
a regression we introduced in the last cycle.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> index 50eb0729385b..a41d79b8d46a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -1145,7 +1145,6 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pcie->pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> - unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcie->resources);
> @@ -1179,13 +1178,58 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie)
> resource_size(&pcie->io) - 1);
> pcie->realio.name = "PCI I/O";
>
> + pci_add_resource(&pcie->resources, &pcie->realio);
> + }
> +
> + return devm_request_pci_bus_resources(dev, &pcie->resources);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This is a copy of pci_host_probe(), except that it does the I/O
> + * remap as the last step, once we are sure we won't fail.
> + *
> + * It should be removed once the I/O remap error handling issue has
> + * been sorted out.
> + */
> +static int mvebu_pci_host_probe(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_pcie *pcie;
> + struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(bridge);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(bridge->dev.parent, "Scanning root bridge failed");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
> + if (resource_size(&pcie->io) != 0) {
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < resource_size(&pcie->realio); i += SZ_64K)
> pci_ioremap_io(i, pcie->io.start + i);
> + }
>
> - pci_add_resource(&pcie->resources, &pcie->realio);
> + bus = bridge->bus;
> +
> + /*
> + * We insert PCI resources into the iomem_resource and
> + * ioport_resource trees in either pci_bus_claim_resources()
> + * or pci_bus_assign_resources().
> + */
> + if (pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> + pci_bus_claim_resources(bus);
> + } else {
> + pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
> + pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
> + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> }
>
> - return devm_request_pci_bus_resources(dev, &pcie->resources);
> + pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -1268,7 +1312,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> bridge->align_resource = mvebu_pcie_align_resource;
> bridge->msi = pcie->msi;
>
> - return pci_host_probe(bridge);
> + return mvebu_pci_host_probe(bridge);
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id mvebu_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
> --
> 2.14.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-01 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-01 12:49 [PATCH] PCI: mvebu: Fix PCI I/O mapping creation sequence Thomas Petazzoni
2018-10-01 12:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-10-01 14:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2018-10-01 14:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-01 14:44 ` Jan Kundrát
2018-10-01 14:44 ` Jan Kundrát
2018-10-01 19:25 ` Jan Kundrát
2018-10-01 19:25 ` Jan Kundrát
2018-10-01 20:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-01 20:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181001140137.GA13049@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.