Re: [PATCH 19/36] dt-bindings: arm: Convert Atmel board/soc bindings to json-schema

[Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>]

Hello,

On 05/10/2018 11:58:31-0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f788315b94fa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: None
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Atmel AT91 device tree bindings.
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> +  - Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Jean-Christophe has not been active for years, I'd mention Ludovic
instead.

> +description: |
> +  Boards with a SoC of the Atmel AT91 or SMART family shall have the following
> +
> +properties:
> +  $nodename:
> +    const: '/'
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - const: atmel,at91rm9200
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - olimex,sam9-l9260
> +          - enum:
> +              - atmel,at91sam9260
> +              - atmel,at91sam9261
> +              - atmel,at91sam9263
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g20
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g45
> +              - atmel,at91sam9n12
> +              - atmel,at91sam9rl
> +              - atmel,at91sam9xe
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9
> +
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g15
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g25
> +              - atmel,at91sam9g35
> +              - atmel,at91sam9x25
> +              - atmel,at91sam9x35
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9x5
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9
> +
> +      - items:
> +          - const: atmel,sama5d27
> +          - const: atmel,sama5d2
> +          - const: atmel,sama5
> +
> +      - description: Nattis v2 board with Natte v2 power board
> +        items:
> +          - const: axentia,nattis-2
> +          - const: axentia,natte-2
> +          - const: axentia,linea

Shouldn't we have the board specific compatibles in a separate file to
avoid mixing everything with the SoC compatibles?


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com