From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add munmap callback
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:15:29 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181024191529.GF15106@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18d5fcf4-84b2-806c-eb2c-787b96e0fb90@linux.intel.com>
Em Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:12:54PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
>
>
> On 10/24/2018 12:32 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 09:23:34AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > > +void perf_event_munmap(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
> > > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > > + struct pmu *pmu;
> > > > +
> > > > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(cpuctx, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list), sched_cb_entry) {
> > >
> > > Would be good have a fast path here that checks for the list being empty
> > > without disabling the interrupts. munmap can be somewhat hot. I think
> > > it's ok to make it slower with perf running, but we shouldn't impact
> > > it without perf.
> >
> > Right, look at how its counterpart, perf_event_mmap() works:
> >
> > void perf_event_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > {
> > struct perf_mmap_event mmap_event;
> >
> > if (!atomic_read(&nr_mmap_events))
> > return;
> > <SNIP>
> > }
> >
>
> Thanks. I'll add the nr_mmap_events check in V2.
That would be a nr_munmap_events, if this is tied to PERF_RECORD_MUNMAP
(right?), which it isn't right now, check Andi's response, mine was more
of a "hey, perf_event_mmap does an atomic check, before grabbing any
locks".
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-24 15:11 [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add munmap callback kan.liang
2018-10-24 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel: Fix missing physical address in large PEBS kan.liang
2018-10-24 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add munmap callback Andi Kleen
2018-10-24 16:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-24 18:12 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-24 18:28 ` Andi Kleen
2018-10-25 0:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-24 19:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-10-24 19:30 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-10-25 0:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-25 0:25 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-10-25 0:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-25 0:44 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-11-01 14:09 ` Liang, Kan
2018-11-05 10:59 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-11-05 15:43 ` Liang, Kan
2018-11-06 15:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-11-06 16:47 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-25 0:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-25 14:00 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-30 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181024191529.GF15106@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.