From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
Alex Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com>,
mporter@kernel.crashing.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 06:48:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181101054831.GA4589@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASUArREw1AWUzcOoQCe5=4jyifbs+x2CdCK+qXJ+woAdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:05:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > How about letting CONFIG_ARM to select HAVE_PCI ?
> >
>
>
> I applied 1/9, 3/9, 4/9, 5/9.
> (I think 2/9 should be squashed to 9/9)
>
> As Russell pointed out, we need to avoid
> the unmet dependency.
Yes, I think the HAVE_PCI is probably the nicest way, but we'll
need to wait what Russell as the maintainer wants.
> Are you planning to send
> the updated version for 6/9 through - 9/9 ?
>
> If so, could you please rebase 6/9
> so that it is cleanly applicable ?
Will do once I find some time after rc1.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Alex Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 06:48:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181101054831.GA4589@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASUArREw1AWUzcOoQCe5=4jyifbs+x2CdCK+qXJ+woAdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:05:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > How about letting CONFIG_ARM to select HAVE_PCI ?
> >
>
>
> I applied 1/9, 3/9, 4/9, 5/9.
> (I think 2/9 should be squashed to 9/9)
>
> As Russell pointed out, we need to avoid
> the unmet dependency.
Yes, I think the HAVE_PCI is probably the nicest way, but we'll
need to wait what Russell as the maintainer wants.
> Are you planning to send
> the updated version for 6/9 through - 9/9 ?
>
> If so, could you please rebase 6/9
> so that it is cleanly applicable ?
Will do once I find some time after rc1.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 06:48:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181101054831.GA4589@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASUArREw1AWUzcOoQCe5=4jyifbs+x2CdCK+qXJ+woAdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:05:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > How about letting CONFIG_ARM to select HAVE_PCI ?
> >
>
>
> I applied 1/9, 3/9, 4/9, 5/9.
> (I think 2/9 should be squashed to 9/9)
>
> As Russell pointed out, we need to avoid
> the unmet dependency.
Yes, I think the HAVE_PCI is probably the nicest way, but we'll
need to wait what Russell as the maintainer wants.
> Are you planning to send
> the updated version for 6/9 through - 9/9 ?
>
> If so, could you please rebase 6/9
> so that it is cleanly applicable ?
Will do once I find some time after rc1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-01 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-19 12:09 move bus (PCI, PCMCIA, EISA, rapdio) config to drivers/ v3 Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/9] aha152x: rename the PCMCIA define Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-31 15:22 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 15:22 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 15:22 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/9] arm: remove EISA kconfig option Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:56 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:56 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:56 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 3/9] powerpc: remove CONFIG_PCI_QSPAN Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-31 15:27 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 15:27 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 15:27 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 4/9] powerpc: remove CONFIG_MCA leftovers Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-31 15:31 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 15:31 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 15:31 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] powerpc: PCI_MSI needs PCI Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 15:10 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-19 15:10 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-19 15:10 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-31 15:33 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 15:33 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 15:33 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 6/9] PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-10-19 12:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-10-19 12:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-10-19 12:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 12:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 16:05 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 16:05 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-31 16:05 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-01 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-11-01 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-01 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-01 10:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-01 10:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-01 10:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-10-19 18:18 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-19 18:18 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-19 18:18 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 22:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-08 22:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-08 22:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 7/9] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the architecture Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 8/9] rapidio: consolidate RAPIDIO config entry in drivers/rapidio Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` [PATCH 9/9] eisa: consolidate EISA Kconfig entry in drivers/eisa Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181101054831.GA4589@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alex.bou9@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.