[PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[sdf]

v2 changes:
* addressed comments/style issues from Jakub Kicinski & Quentin Monnet
* removed logic that populates jump table
* added cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin

This patch series adds support for loading and attaching flow dissector
programs from the bpftool:

* first patch fixes flow dissector section name in the selftests (so
  libbpf auto-detection works)
* second patch adds proper cleanup to bpf_object__pin which is now being
  used to attach all flow dissector progs/maps
* third patch adds actual support to the bpftool

See third patch for the description/details.

Stanislav Fomichev (3):
  selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
  libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
  bpftool: support loading flow dissector

 .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst    | 26 +++--
 tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |  2 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    | 30 +++---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h                      |  1 +
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                      | 94 ++++++++++++++-----
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 58 ++++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c        |  2 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh      |  2 +-
 8 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

v2 changes:
* addressed comments/style issues from Jakub Kicinski & Quentin Monnet
* removed logic that populates jump table
* added cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin

This patch series adds support for loading and attaching flow dissector
programs from the bpftool:

* first patch fixes flow dissector section name in the selftests (so
  libbpf auto-detection works)
* second patch adds proper cleanup to bpf_object__pin which is now being
  used to attach all flow dissector progs/maps
* third patch adds actual support to the bpftool

See third patch for the description/details.

Stanislav Fomichev (3):
  selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
  libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
  bpftool: support loading flow dissector

 .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst    | 26 +++--
 tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |  2 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    | 30 +++---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h                      |  1 +
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                      | 94 ++++++++++++++-----
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 58 ++++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c        |  2 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh      |  2 +-
 8 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

v2 changes:
* addressed comments/style issues from Jakub Kicinski & Quentin Monnet
* removed logic that populates jump table
* added cleanup for partial failure in bpf_object__pin

This patch series adds support for loading and attaching flow dissector
programs from the bpftool:

* first patch fixes flow dissector section name in the selftests (so
  libbpf auto-detection works)
* second patch adds proper cleanup to bpf_object__pin which is now being
  used to attach all flow dissector progs/maps
* third patch adds actual support to the bpftool

See third patch for the description/details.

Stanislav Fomichev (3):
  selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector
  libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin
  bpftool: support loading flow dissector

 .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst    | 26 +++--
 tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |  2 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    | 30 +++---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h                      |  1 +
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                      | 94 ++++++++++++++-----
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 58 ++++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c        |  2 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh      |  2 +-
 8 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector

[sdf]

Makes it compatible with the logic that derives program type
from section name in libbpf_prog_type_by_name.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c             | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
index 107350a7821d..b9798f558ca7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static __always_inline int parse_eth_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, __be16 proto)
 	return BPF_DROP;
 }
 
-SEC("dissect")
+SEC("flow_dissector")
 int _dissect(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	if (!skb->vlan_present)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
index c0fb073b5eab..d23d4da66b83 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ else
 fi
 
 # Attach BPF program
-./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s dissect
+./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s flow_dissector
 
 # Setup
 tc qdisc add dev lo ingress
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

Makes it compatible with the logic that derives program type
from section name in libbpf_prog_type_by_name.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c             | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
index 107350a7821d..b9798f558ca7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static __always_inline int parse_eth_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, __be16 proto)
 	return BPF_DROP;
 }
 
-SEC("dissect")
+SEC("flow_dissector")
 int _dissect(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	if (!skb->vlan_present)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
index c0fb073b5eab..d23d4da66b83 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ else
 fi
 
 # Attach BPF program
-./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s dissect
+./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s flow_dissector
 
 # Setup
 tc qdisc add dev lo ingress
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: rename flow dissector section to flow_dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

Makes it compatible with the logic that derives program type
from section name in libbpf_prog_type_by_name.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c             | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
index 107350a7821d..b9798f558ca7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static __always_inline int parse_eth_proto(struct __sk_buff *skb, __be16 proto)
 	return BPF_DROP;
 }
 
-SEC("dissect")
+SEC("flow_dissector")
 int _dissect(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	if (!skb->vlan_present)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
index c0fb073b5eab..d23d4da66b83 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ else
 fi
 
 # Attach BPF program
-./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s dissect
+./flow_dissector_load -p bpf_flow.o -s flow_dissector
 
 # Setup
 tc qdisc add dev lo ingress
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[sdf]

bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
 
 		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
 			       bpf_map__name(map));
-		if (len < 0)
-			return -EINVAL;
-		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
-			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+		if (len < 0) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
+		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
+		}
 
 		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
 	}
 
 	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
@@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
 
 		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
 			       prog->section_name);
-		if (len < 0)
-			return -EINVAL;
-		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
-			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+		if (len < 0) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
+		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
+		}
 
 		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_unpin_programs:
+	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
+		char buf[PATH_MAX];
+		int len;
+
+		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+			       prog->section_name);
+		if (len < 0)
+			continue;
+		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+			continue;
+
+		unlink(buf);
+	}
+
+err_unpin_maps:
+	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
+		char buf[PATH_MAX];
+		int len;
+
+		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+			       bpf_map__name(map));
+		if (len < 0)
+			continue;
+		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+			continue;
+
+		unlink(buf);
+	}
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Stanislav Fomichev]

bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
 
 		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
 			       bpf_map__name(map));
-		if (len < 0)
-			return -EINVAL;
-		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
-			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+		if (len < 0) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
+		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
+		}
 
 		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
 	}
 
 	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
@@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
 
 		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
 			       prog->section_name);
-		if (len < 0)
-			return -EINVAL;
-		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
-			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+		if (len < 0) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
+		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
+		}
 
 		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_unpin_programs:
+	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
+		char buf[PATH_MAX];
+		int len;
+
+		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+			       prog->section_name);
+		if (len < 0)
+			continue;
+		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+			continue;
+
+		unlink(buf);
+	}
+
+err_unpin_maps:
+	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
+		char buf[PATH_MAX];
+		int len;
+
+		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+			       bpf_map__name(map));
+		if (len < 0)
+			continue;
+		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+			continue;
+
+		unlink(buf);
+	}
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Stanislav Fomichev]

bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
 
 		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
 			       bpf_map__name(map));
-		if (len < 0)
-			return -EINVAL;
-		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
-			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+		if (len < 0) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
+		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
+		}
 
 		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto err_unpin_maps;
 	}
 
 	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
@@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
 
 		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
 			       prog->section_name);
-		if (len < 0)
-			return -EINVAL;
-		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
-			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+		if (len < 0) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
+		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
+			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
+		}
 
 		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto err_unpin_programs;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_unpin_programs:
+	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
+		char buf[PATH_MAX];
+		int len;
+
+		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+			       prog->section_name);
+		if (len < 0)
+			continue;
+		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+			continue;
+
+		unlink(buf);
+	}
+
+err_unpin_maps:
+	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
+		char buf[PATH_MAX];
+		int len;
+
+		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
+			       bpf_map__name(map));
+		if (len < 0)
+			continue;
+		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
+			continue;
+
+		unlink(buf);
+	}
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[jakub.kicinski]

On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:55 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
> and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
> back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
>  
>  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
>  			       bpf_map__name(map));
> -		if (len < 0)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +		if (len < 0) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> +		}
>  
>  		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
>  		if (err)
> -			return err;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
>  	}
>  
>  	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> @@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
>  
>  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
>  			       prog->section_name);
> -		if (len < 0)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +		if (len < 0) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> +		}
>  
>  		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
>  		if (err)
> -			return err;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> +
> +err_unpin_programs:
> +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +		int len;
> +
> +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> +			       prog->section_name);
> +		if (len < 0)
> +			continue;
> +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		unlink(buf);

I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
you'll now remove that already existing file.

> +	}
> +
> +err_unpin_maps:
> +	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
> +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +		int len;
> +
> +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> +			       bpf_map__name(map));
> +		if (len < 0)
> +			continue;
> +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		unlink(buf);
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:55 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
> and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
> back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
>  
>  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
>  			       bpf_map__name(map));
> -		if (len < 0)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +		if (len < 0) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> +		}
>  
>  		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
>  		if (err)
> -			return err;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
>  	}
>  
>  	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> @@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
>  
>  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
>  			       prog->section_name);
> -		if (len < 0)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +		if (len < 0) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> +		}
>  
>  		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
>  		if (err)
> -			return err;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> +
> +err_unpin_programs:
> +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +		int len;
> +
> +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> +			       prog->section_name);
> +		if (len < 0)
> +			continue;
> +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		unlink(buf);

I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
you'll now remove that already existing file.

> +	}
> +
> +err_unpin_maps:
> +	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
> +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +		int len;
> +
> +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> +			       bpf_map__name(map));
> +		if (len < 0)
> +			continue;
> +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		unlink(buf);
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:55 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
> and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
> back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
>  
>  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
>  			       bpf_map__name(map));
> -		if (len < 0)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +		if (len < 0) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> +		}
>  
>  		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
>  		if (err)
> -			return err;
> +			goto err_unpin_maps;
>  	}
>  
>  	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> @@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
>  
>  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
>  			       prog->section_name);
> -		if (len < 0)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +		if (len < 0) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> +		}
>  
>  		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
>  		if (err)
> -			return err;
> +			goto err_unpin_programs;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> +
> +err_unpin_programs:
> +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +		int len;
> +
> +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> +			       prog->section_name);
> +		if (len < 0)
> +			continue;
> +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		unlink(buf);

I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
you'll now remove that already existing file.

> +	}
> +
> +err_unpin_maps:
> +	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
> +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +		int len;
> +
> +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> +			       bpf_map__name(map));
> +		if (len < 0)
> +			continue;
> +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		unlink(buf);
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[sdf]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:55 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
> > and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
> > back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
> >  
> >  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> >  			       bpf_map__name(map));
> > -		if (len < 0)
> > -			return -EINVAL;
> > -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +		if (len < 0) {
> > +			err = -EINVAL;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> > +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> > +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
> >  		if (err)
> > -			return err;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > @@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
> >  
> >  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> >  			       prog->section_name);
> > -		if (len < 0)
> > -			return -EINVAL;
> > -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +		if (len < 0) {
> > +			err = -EINVAL;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> > +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> > +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
> >  		if (err)
> > -			return err;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > +
> > +err_unpin_programs:
> > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > +		int len;
> > +
> > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > +			       prog->section_name);
> > +		if (len < 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		unlink(buf);
> 
> I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> you'll now remove that already existing file.
How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
overwrite something?

> > +	}
> > +
> > +err_unpin_maps:
> > +	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
> > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > +		int len;
> > +
> > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > +			       bpf_map__name(map));
> > +		if (len < 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		unlink(buf);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> >  void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
> 

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:55 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
> > and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
> > back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
> >  
> >  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> >  			       bpf_map__name(map));
> > -		if (len < 0)
> > -			return -EINVAL;
> > -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +		if (len < 0) {
> > +			err = -EINVAL;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> > +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> > +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
> >  		if (err)
> > -			return err;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > @@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
> >  
> >  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> >  			       prog->section_name);
> > -		if (len < 0)
> > -			return -EINVAL;
> > -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +		if (len < 0) {
> > +			err = -EINVAL;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> > +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> > +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
> >  		if (err)
> > -			return err;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > +
> > +err_unpin_programs:
> > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > +		int len;
> > +
> > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > +			       prog->section_name);
> > +		if (len < 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		unlink(buf);
> 
> I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> you'll now remove that already existing file.
How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
overwrite something?

> > +	}
> > +
> > +err_unpin_maps:
> > +	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
> > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > +		int len;
> > +
> > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > +			       bpf_map__name(map));
> > +		if (len < 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		unlink(buf);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> >  void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
> 

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:55 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > bpftool will use bpf_object__pin in the next commit to pin all programs
> > and maps from the file; in case of a partial failure, we need to get
> > back to the clean state (undo previous program/map pins).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index d6e62e90e8d4..309abe7196f3 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -1803,14 +1803,17 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
> >  
> >  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> >  			       bpf_map__name(map));
> > -		if (len < 0)
> > -			return -EINVAL;
> > -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +		if (len < 0) {
> > +			err = -EINVAL;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> > +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> > +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		err = bpf_map__pin(map, buf);
> >  		if (err)
> > -			return err;
> > +			goto err_unpin_maps;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > @@ -1819,17 +1822,52 @@ int bpf_object__pin(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *path)
> >  
> >  		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> >  			       prog->section_name);
> > -		if (len < 0)
> > -			return -EINVAL;
> > -		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > -			return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +		if (len < 0) {
> > +			err = -EINVAL;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> > +		} else if (len >= PATH_MAX) {
> > +			err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		err = bpf_program__pin(prog, buf);
> >  		if (err)
> > -			return err;
> > +			goto err_unpin_programs;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > +
> > +err_unpin_programs:
> > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > +		int len;
> > +
> > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > +			       prog->section_name);
> > +		if (len < 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		unlink(buf);
> 
> I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> you'll now remove that already existing file.
How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
overwrite something?

> > +	}
> > +
> > +err_unpin_maps:
> > +	bpf_map__for_each(map, obj) {
> > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > +		int len;
> > +
> > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > +			       bpf_map__name(map));
> > +		if (len < 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		unlink(buf);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> >  void bpf_object__close(struct bpf_object *obj)
> 

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[jakub.kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > +		int len;
> > > +
> > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		unlink(buf);  
> > 
> > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > you'll now remove that already existing file.  
>
> How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> overwrite something?

Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > +		int len;
> > > +
> > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		unlink(buf);  
> > 
> > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > you'll now remove that already existing file.  
>
> How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> overwrite something?

Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > +		int len;
> > > +
> > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		unlink(buf);  
> > 
> > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > you'll now remove that already existing file.  
>
> How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> overwrite something?

Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[sdf]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > > +		int len;
> > > > +
> > > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +		unlink(buf);  
> > > 
> > > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > > you'll now remove that already existing file.  
> >
> > How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> > overwrite something?
> 
> Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
> the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
> I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
> list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..
That sounds more complicated than just ensuring that the top directory
for the pins doesn't exist and then rm -rf it on failure.
I'm thinking about copy-pasting rm_rf from perf
(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/util.c#n119).
Thoughts?

Btw, current patch won't work because of those /0 added by bpf_program__pin.

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > > +		int len;
> > > > +
> > > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +		unlink(buf);  
> > > 
> > > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > > you'll now remove that already existing file.  
> >
> > How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> > overwrite something?
> 
> Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
> the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
> I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
> list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..
That sounds more complicated than just ensuring that the top directory
for the pins doesn't exist and then rm -rf it on failure.
I'm thinking about copy-pasting rm_rf from perf
(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/util.c#n119).
Thoughts?

Btw, current patch won't work because of those /0 added by bpf_program__pin.

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > > +		int len;
> > > > +
> > > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +		unlink(buf);  
> > > 
> > > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > > you'll now remove that already existing file.  
> >
> > How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> > overwrite something?
> 
> Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
> the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
> I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
> list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..
That sounds more complicated than just ensuring that the top directory
for the pins doesn't exist and then rm -rf it on failure.
I'm thinking about copy-pasting rm_rf from perf
(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/util.c#n119).
Thoughts?

Btw, current patch won't work because of those /0 added by bpf_program__pin.

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[jakub.kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:25:16 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > > > +		int len;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		unlink(buf);    
> > > > 
> > > > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > > > you'll now remove that already existing file.    
> > >
> > > How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> > > overwrite something?  
> > 
> > Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
> > the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
> > I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
> > list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..  
>
> That sounds more complicated than just ensuring that the top directory
> for the pins doesn't exist and then rm -rf it on failure.

Why would we require that the directory does not exist?  We can
check if it exists and then either create or just pin all in an existing
one.

I don't think it should be that much effort to write a reverse for
loop - it could actually be less LoC than that rm_rf function :)

> I'm thinking about copy-pasting rm_rf from perf
> (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/util.c#n119).
> Thoughts?
>
> Btw, current patch won't work because of those /0 added by bpf_program__pin.

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:25:16 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > > > +		int len;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		unlink(buf);    
> > > > 
> > > > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > > > you'll now remove that already existing file.    
> > >
> > > How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> > > overwrite something?  
> > 
> > Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
> > the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
> > I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
> > list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..  
>
> That sounds more complicated than just ensuring that the top directory
> for the pins doesn't exist and then rm -rf it on failure.

Why would we require that the directory does not exist?  We can
check if it exists and then either create or just pin all in an existing
one.

I don't think it should be that much effort to write a reverse for
loop - it could actually be less LoC than that rm_rf function :)

> I'm thinking about copy-pasting rm_rf from perf
> (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/util.c#n119).
> Thoughts?
>
> Btw, current patch won't work because of those /0 added by bpf_program__pin.

[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: cleanup after partial failure in bpf_object__pin

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:25:16 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:21 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > > +err_unpin_programs:
> > > > > +	bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
> > > > > +		char buf[PATH_MAX];
> > > > > +		int len;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		len = snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", path,
> > > > > +			       prog->section_name);
> > > > > +		if (len < 0)
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +		else if (len >= PATH_MAX)
> > > > > +			continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		unlink(buf);    
> > > > 
> > > > I think that's no bueno, if pin failed because the file already exists
> > > > you'll now remove that already existing file.    
> > >
> > > How about we check beforehand and bail early if we are going to
> > > overwrite something?  
> > 
> > Possible, although the most common way to handle situation like this in
> > the kernel is to "continue the iteration in reverse" over the list.
> > I.e. walk the list back.  I think the objects are on a double linked
> > list.  You may need to add the appropriate foreach macro and helper..  
>
> That sounds more complicated than just ensuring that the top directory
> for the pins doesn't exist and then rm -rf it on failure.

Why would we require that the directory does not exist?  We can
check if it exists and then either create or just pin all in an existing
one.

I don't think it should be that much effort to write a reverse for
loop - it could actually be less LoC than that rm_rf function :)

> I'm thinking about copy-pasting rm_rf from perf
> (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/util.c#n119).
> Thoughts?
>
> Btw, current patch won't work because of those /0 added by bpf_program__pin.

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[sdf]

This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
assumed to be the same as in the selftests:

* flow_dissector section with the main entry point
* a bunch of tail call progs
* a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs

When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
construct the jump table for the tail calls.

The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
case.

Example:
bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
	/sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 0 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 1 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 2 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 3 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 4 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 5 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN/0

bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector/0 flow_dissector

Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
 .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst    | 26 +++--
 tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |  2 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    | 30 +++---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h                      |  1 +
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                      | 94 ++++++++++++++-----
 5 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
index ac4e904b10fb..a7b6934a8ac9 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ MAP COMMANDS
 |	**bpftool** **prog dump jited**  *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
 |	**bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
 |	**bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
-|       **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-|       **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
+|       **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+|       **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
 |	**bpftool** **prog help**
 |
 |	*MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
 |		**cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
 |		**cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
 |	}
-|       *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
+|       *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
+|		**msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
+|	}
 
 
 DESCRIPTION
@@ -97,13 +99,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
 		  contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
 		  extensions of *bpffs*.
 
-        **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-                  Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
-                  to the map *MAP*.
-
-        **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-                  Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
-                  from the map *MAP*.
+        **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+                  Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+                  *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+                  parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+                  attached to current networking name space.
+
+        **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+                  Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+                  *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+                  parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+                  detached from the current networking name space.
 
 	**bpftool prog help**
 		  Print short help message.
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
index 3f78e6404589..4ab892adfa9f 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
                     fi
 
                     if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
-                        COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
+                        COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
                         return 0
                     fi
 
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
 	return fd;
 }
 
-int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
 {
 	char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
 	char *file;
 	char *dir;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
-	if (!err)
-		goto out;
-
 	file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
 	strcpy(file, name);
 	dir = dirname(file);
 
-	if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
-		p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
+	if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
+		/* nothing to do if already mounted */
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 
-	/* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
 	err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
-	if (!err) {
-		err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
-		if (err)
-			p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
-			      strerror(errno));
-	} else {
+	if (err) {
 		err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
 		p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
 		      name, err_str);
@@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
 
 out_free:
 	free(file);
-out:
 	return err;
 }
 
+int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
+}
+
 int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
 {
 	unsigned int id;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
 char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
 int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
 int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
 int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
 int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
 
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 5302ee282409..feee1d184433 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
 	[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
 	[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
 	[BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
+	[BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
 	[__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
 };
 
@@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
 static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
-	int err, mapfd, progfd;
+	int err, progfd;
+	int mapfd = 0;
 
-	if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
-		p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+	if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+		p_err("too few parameters for attach");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 		p_err("invalid attach type");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	NEXT_ARG();
+	if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		NEXT_ARG();
+		if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+			p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 
-	mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
-	if (mapfd < 0)
-		return mapfd;
+		mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+		if (mapfd < 0)
+			return mapfd;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
 	if (err) {
@@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
-	int err, mapfd, progfd;
+	int err, progfd;
+	int mapfd = 0;
 
-	if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
-		p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+	if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+		p_err("too few parameters for detach");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 		p_err("invalid attach type");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	NEXT_ARG();
+	if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		NEXT_ARG();
+		if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+			p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 
-	mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
-	if (mapfd < 0)
-		return mapfd;
+		mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+		if (mapfd < 0)
+			return mapfd;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
 	if (err) {
@@ -792,6 +807,7 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 		jsonw_null(json_wtr);
 	return 0;
 }
+
 static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
@@ -799,8 +815,8 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
 	};
 	struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
+	struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
 	unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
-	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	const char *pinfile;
@@ -918,13 +934,14 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto err_free_reuse_maps;
 	}
 
-	prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
-	if (!prog) {
-		p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
-		goto err_close_obj;
+	if (attr.prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
+		if (!prog) {
+			p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
 	}
 
-	bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
 	if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
 		const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
 
@@ -936,8 +953,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 			goto err_close_obj;
 		}
 	}
-	bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
-	bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
+
+	bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
+		bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
+		bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
+		bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
+						      expected_attach_type);
+	}
 
 	qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
 	      map_replace_compar);
@@ -1001,9 +1023,28 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto err_close_obj;
 	}
 
-	if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
+	err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
+	if (err)
 		goto err_close_obj;
 
+	if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		/* flow dissector consist of multiple programs,
+		 * we want to pin them all
+		 */
+		err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
+		if (err) {
+			p_err("failed to pin flow dissector object");
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
+	} else {
+		err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
+		if (err) {
+			p_err("failed to pin program %s",
+			      bpf_program__title(prog, false));
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (json_output)
 		jsonw_null(json_wtr);
 
@@ -1037,8 +1078,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
 		"       %s %s pin   PROG FILE\n"
 		"       %s %s load  OBJ  FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
 		"                         [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
-		"       %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
-		"       %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
+		"       %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
+		"       %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
 		"       %s %s help\n"
 		"\n"
 		"       " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
@@ -1050,7 +1091,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
 		"                 cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
 		"                 cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
 		"                 cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
-		"       ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
+		"       ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
+		"                        flow_dissector }\n"
 		"       " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
 		"",
 		bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
assumed to be the same as in the selftests:

* flow_dissector section with the main entry point
* a bunch of tail call progs
* a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs

When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
construct the jump table for the tail calls.

The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
case.

Example:
bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
	/sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 0 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 1 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 2 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 3 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 4 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 5 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN/0

bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector/0 flow_dissector

Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst    | 26 +++--
 tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |  2 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    | 30 +++---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h                      |  1 +
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                      | 94 ++++++++++++++-----
 5 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
index ac4e904b10fb..a7b6934a8ac9 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ MAP COMMANDS
 |	**bpftool** **prog dump jited**  *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
 |	**bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
 |	**bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
-|       **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-|       **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
+|       **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+|       **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
 |	**bpftool** **prog help**
 |
 |	*MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
 |		**cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
 |		**cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
 |	}
-|       *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
+|       *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
+|		**msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
+|	}
 
 
 DESCRIPTION
@@ -97,13 +99,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
 		  contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
 		  extensions of *bpffs*.
 
-        **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-                  Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
-                  to the map *MAP*.
-
-        **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-                  Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
-                  from the map *MAP*.
+        **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+                  Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+                  *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+                  parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+                  attached to current networking name space.
+
+        **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+                  Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+                  *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+                  parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+                  detached from the current networking name space.
 
 	**bpftool prog help**
 		  Print short help message.
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
index 3f78e6404589..4ab892adfa9f 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
                     fi
 
                     if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
-                        COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
+                        COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
                         return 0
                     fi
 
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
 	return fd;
 }
 
-int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
 {
 	char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
 	char *file;
 	char *dir;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
-	if (!err)
-		goto out;
-
 	file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
 	strcpy(file, name);
 	dir = dirname(file);
 
-	if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
-		p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
+	if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
+		/* nothing to do if already mounted */
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 
-	/* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
 	err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
-	if (!err) {
-		err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
-		if (err)
-			p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
-			      strerror(errno));
-	} else {
+	if (err) {
 		err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
 		p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
 		      name, err_str);
@@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
 
 out_free:
 	free(file);
-out:
 	return err;
 }
 
+int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
+}
+
 int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
 {
 	unsigned int id;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
 char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
 int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
 int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
 int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
 int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
 
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 5302ee282409..feee1d184433 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
 	[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
 	[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
 	[BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
+	[BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
 	[__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
 };
 
@@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
 static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
-	int err, mapfd, progfd;
+	int err, progfd;
+	int mapfd = 0;
 
-	if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
-		p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+	if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+		p_err("too few parameters for attach");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 		p_err("invalid attach type");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	NEXT_ARG();
+	if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		NEXT_ARG();
+		if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+			p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 
-	mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
-	if (mapfd < 0)
-		return mapfd;
+		mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+		if (mapfd < 0)
+			return mapfd;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
 	if (err) {
@@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
-	int err, mapfd, progfd;
+	int err, progfd;
+	int mapfd = 0;
 
-	if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
-		p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+	if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+		p_err("too few parameters for detach");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 		p_err("invalid attach type");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	NEXT_ARG();
+	if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		NEXT_ARG();
+		if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+			p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 
-	mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
-	if (mapfd < 0)
-		return mapfd;
+		mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+		if (mapfd < 0)
+			return mapfd;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
 	if (err) {
@@ -792,6 +807,7 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 		jsonw_null(json_wtr);
 	return 0;
 }
+
 static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
@@ -799,8 +815,8 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
 	};
 	struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
+	struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
 	unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
-	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	const char *pinfile;
@@ -918,13 +934,14 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto err_free_reuse_maps;
 	}
 
-	prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
-	if (!prog) {
-		p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
-		goto err_close_obj;
+	if (attr.prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
+		if (!prog) {
+			p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
 	}
 
-	bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
 	if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
 		const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
 
@@ -936,8 +953,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 			goto err_close_obj;
 		}
 	}
-	bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
-	bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
+
+	bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
+		bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
+		bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
+		bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
+						      expected_attach_type);
+	}
 
 	qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
 	      map_replace_compar);
@@ -1001,9 +1023,28 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto err_close_obj;
 	}
 
-	if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
+	err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
+	if (err)
 		goto err_close_obj;
 
+	if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		/* flow dissector consist of multiple programs,
+		 * we want to pin them all
+		 */
+		err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
+		if (err) {
+			p_err("failed to pin flow dissector object");
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
+	} else {
+		err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
+		if (err) {
+			p_err("failed to pin program %s",
+			      bpf_program__title(prog, false));
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (json_output)
 		jsonw_null(json_wtr);
 
@@ -1037,8 +1078,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
 		"       %s %s pin   PROG FILE\n"
 		"       %s %s load  OBJ  FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
 		"                         [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
-		"       %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
-		"       %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
+		"       %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
+		"       %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
 		"       %s %s help\n"
 		"\n"
 		"       " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
@@ -1050,7 +1091,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
 		"                 cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
 		"                 cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
 		"                 cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
-		"       ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
+		"       ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
+		"                        flow_dissector }\n"
 		"       " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
 		"",
 		bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

This commit adds support for loading/attaching/detaching flow
dissector program. The structure of the flow dissector program is
assumed to be the same as in the selftests:

* flow_dissector section with the main entry point
* a bunch of tail call progs
* a jmp_table map that is populated with the tail call progs

When `bpftool load` is called with a flow_dissector prog (i.e. when the
first section is flow_dissector of 'type flow_dissector' argument is
passed), we load and pin all the programs/maps. User is responsible to
construct the jump table for the tail calls.

The last argument of `bpftool attach` is made optional for this use
case.

Example:
bpftool prog load tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_flow.o \
	/sys/fs/bpf/flow type flow_dissector

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 0 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 1 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 2 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6OP/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 3 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IPV6FR/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 4 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/MPLS/0

bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
        key 5 0 0 0 \
        value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/VLAN/0

bpftool prog attach pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/flow_dissector/0 flow_dissector

Tested by using the above lines to load the prog in
the test_flow_dissector.sh selftest.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf at google.com>
---
 .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst    | 26 +++--
 tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |  2 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    | 30 +++---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h                      |  1 +
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                      | 94 ++++++++++++++-----
 5 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
index ac4e904b10fb..a7b6934a8ac9 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ MAP COMMANDS
 |	**bpftool** **prog dump jited**  *PROG* [{**file** *FILE* | **opcodes**}]
 |	**bpftool** **prog pin** *PROG* *FILE*
 |	**bpftool** **prog load** *OBJ* *FILE* [**type** *TYPE*] [**map** {**idx** *IDX* | **name** *NAME*} *MAP*] [**dev** *NAME*]
-|       **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-|       **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
+|       **bpftool** **prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+|       **bpftool** **prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
 |	**bpftool** **prog help**
 |
 |	*MAP* := { **id** *MAP_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ MAP COMMANDS
 |		**cgroup/bind4** | **cgroup/bind6** | **cgroup/post_bind4** | **cgroup/post_bind6** |
 |		**cgroup/connect4** | **cgroup/connect6** | **cgroup/sendmsg4** | **cgroup/sendmsg6**
 |	}
-|       *ATTACH_TYPE* := { **msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** }
+|       *ATTACH_TYPE* := {
+|		**msg_verdict** | **skb_verdict** | **skb_parse** | **flow_dissector**
+|	}
 
 
 DESCRIPTION
@@ -97,13 +99,17 @@ DESCRIPTION
 		  contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
 		  extensions of *bpffs*.
 
-        **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-                  Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
-                  to the map *MAP*.
-
-        **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* *MAP*
-                  Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by *ATTACH_TYPE*)
-                  from the map *MAP*.
+        **bpftool prog attach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+                  Attach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+                  *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+                  parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+                  attached to current networking name space.
+
+        **bpftool prog detach** *PROG* *ATTACH_TYPE* [*MAP*]
+                  Detach bpf program *PROG* (with type specified by
+                  *ATTACH_TYPE*). Most *ATTACH_TYPEs* require a *MAP*
+                  parameter, with the exception of *flow_dissector* which is
+                  detached from the current networking name space.
 
 	**bpftool prog help**
 		  Print short help message.
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
index 3f78e6404589..4ab892adfa9f 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ _bpftool()
                     fi
 
                     if [[ ${#words[@]} == 6 ]]; then
-                        COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse" -- "$cur" ) )
+                        COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "msg_verdict skb_verdict skb_parse flow_dissector" -- "$cur" ) )
                         return 0
                     fi
 
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 25af85304ebe..f671a921dec5 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -169,34 +169,24 @@ int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type)
 	return fd;
 }
 
-int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name)
 {
 	char err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN];
 	char *file;
 	char *dir;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
-	if (!err)
-		goto out;
-
 	file = malloc(strlen(name) + 1);
 	strcpy(file, name);
 	dir = dirname(file);
 
-	if (errno != EPERM || is_bpffs(dir)) {
-		p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name, strerror(errno));
+	if (is_bpffs(dir)) {
+		/* nothing to do if already mounted */
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 
-	/* Attempt to mount bpffs, then retry pinning. */
 	err = mnt_bpffs(dir, err_str, ERR_MAX_LEN);
-	if (!err) {
-		err = bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
-		if (err)
-			p_err("can't pin the object (%s): %s", name,
-			      strerror(errno));
-	} else {
+	if (err) {
 		err_str[ERR_MAX_LEN - 1] = '\0';
 		p_err("can't mount BPF file system to pin the object (%s): %s",
 		      name, err_str);
@@ -204,10 +194,20 @@ int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
 
 out_free:
 	free(file);
-out:
 	return err;
 }
 
+int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(name);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return bpf_obj_pin(fd, name);
+}
+
 int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32))
 {
 	unsigned int id;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index 28322ace2856..1383824c9baf 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ const char *get_fd_type_name(enum bpf_obj_type type);
 char *get_fdinfo(int fd, const char *key);
 int open_obj_pinned(char *path);
 int open_obj_pinned_any(char *path, enum bpf_obj_type exp_type);
+int mount_bpffs_for_pin(const char *name);
 int do_pin_any(int argc, char **argv, int (*get_fd_by_id)(__u32));
 int do_pin_fd(int fd, const char *name);
 
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 5302ee282409..feee1d184433 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_strings[] = {
 	[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER] = "stream_parser",
 	[BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT] = "stream_verdict",
 	[BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT] = "msg_verdict",
+	[BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR] = "flow_dissector",
 	[__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE] = NULL,
 };
 
@@ -724,10 +725,11 @@ int map_replace_compar(const void *p1, const void *p2)
 static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
-	int err, mapfd, progfd;
+	int err, progfd;
+	int mapfd = 0;
 
-	if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
-		p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+	if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+		p_err("too few parameters for attach");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -740,11 +742,17 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 		p_err("invalid attach type");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	NEXT_ARG();
+	if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		NEXT_ARG();
+		if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+			p_err("too few parameters for map attach");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 
-	mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
-	if (mapfd < 0)
-		return mapfd;
+		mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+		if (mapfd < 0)
+			return mapfd;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_prog_attach(progfd, mapfd, attach_type, 0);
 	if (err) {
@@ -760,10 +768,11 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
 static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
-	int err, mapfd, progfd;
+	int err, progfd;
+	int mapfd = 0;
 
-	if (!REQ_ARGS(5)) {
-		p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+	if (!REQ_ARGS(3)) {
+		p_err("too few parameters for detach");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -776,11 +785,17 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 		p_err("invalid attach type");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	NEXT_ARG();
+	if (attach_type != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		NEXT_ARG();
+		if (!REQ_ARGS(2)) {
+			p_err("too few parameters for map detach");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 
-	mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
-	if (mapfd < 0)
-		return mapfd;
+		mapfd = map_parse_fd(&argc, &argv);
+		if (mapfd < 0)
+			return mapfd;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, mapfd, attach_type);
 	if (err) {
@@ -792,6 +807,7 @@ static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
 		jsonw_null(json_wtr);
 	return 0;
 }
+
 static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
@@ -799,8 +815,8 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		.prog_type	= BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
 	};
 	struct map_replace *map_replace = NULL;
+	struct bpf_program *prog = NULL, *pos;
 	unsigned int old_map_fds = 0;
-	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
 	const char *pinfile;
@@ -918,13 +934,14 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto err_free_reuse_maps;
 	}
 
-	prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
-	if (!prog) {
-		p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
-		goto err_close_obj;
+	if (attr.prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
+		if (!prog) {
+			p_err("object file doesn't contain any bpf program");
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
 	}
 
-	bpf_program__set_ifindex(prog, ifindex);
 	if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC) {
 		const char *sec_name = bpf_program__title(prog, false);
 
@@ -936,8 +953,13 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 			goto err_close_obj;
 		}
 	}
-	bpf_program__set_type(prog, attr.prog_type);
-	bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog, expected_attach_type);
+
+	bpf_object__for_each_program(pos, obj) {
+		bpf_program__set_ifindex(pos, ifindex);
+		bpf_program__set_type(pos, attr.prog_type);
+		bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(pos,
+						      expected_attach_type);
+	}
 
 	qsort(map_replace, old_map_fds, sizeof(*map_replace),
 	      map_replace_compar);
@@ -1001,9 +1023,28 @@ static int do_load(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto err_close_obj;
 	}
 
-	if (do_pin_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile))
+	err = mount_bpffs_for_pin(pinfile);
+	if (err)
 		goto err_close_obj;
 
+	if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR) {
+		/* flow dissector consist of multiple programs,
+		 * we want to pin them all
+		 */
+		err = bpf_object__pin(obj, pinfile);
+		if (err) {
+			p_err("failed to pin flow dissector object");
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
+	} else {
+		err = bpf_obj_pin(bpf_program__fd(prog), pinfile);
+		if (err) {
+			p_err("failed to pin program %s",
+			      bpf_program__title(prog, false));
+			goto err_close_obj;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (json_output)
 		jsonw_null(json_wtr);
 
@@ -1037,8 +1078,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
 		"       %s %s pin   PROG FILE\n"
 		"       %s %s load  OBJ  FILE [type TYPE] [dev NAME] \\\n"
 		"                         [map { idx IDX | name NAME } MAP]\n"
-		"       %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
-		"       %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE MAP\n"
+		"       %s %s attach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
+		"       %s %s detach PROG ATTACH_TYPE [MAP]\n"
 		"       %s %s help\n"
 		"\n"
 		"       " HELP_SPEC_MAP "\n"
@@ -1050,7 +1091,8 @@ static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
 		"                 cgroup/bind4 | cgroup/bind6 | cgroup/post_bind4 |\n"
 		"                 cgroup/post_bind6 | cgroup/connect4 | cgroup/connect6 |\n"
 		"                 cgroup/sendmsg4 | cgroup/sendmsg6 }\n"
-		"       ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse }\n"
+		"       ATTACH_TYPE := { msg_verdict | skb_verdict | skb_parse |\n"
+		"                        flow_dissector }\n"
 		"       " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS "\n"
 		"",
 		bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2], bin_name, argv[-2],
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[jakub.kicinski]

On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>         key 0 0 0 0 \
>         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0

Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>         key 0 0 0 0 \
>         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0

Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
>         key 0 0 0 0 \
>         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0

Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[sdf]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0
> 
> Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.
libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0
> 
> Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.
libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0
> 
> Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.
libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[jakub.kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0  
> > 
> > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.  
> libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744

Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(

We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
bpftool.

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0  
> > 
> > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.  
> libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744

Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(

We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
bpftool.

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0  
> > 
> > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.  
> libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744

Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(

We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
bpftool.

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[sdf]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0  
> > > 
> > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.  
> > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744
> 
> Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> 
> We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> bpftool.
I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
the wheel. Any objections?

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0  
> > > 
> > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.  
> > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744
> 
> Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> 
> We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> bpftool.
I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
the wheel. Any objections?

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0  
> > > 
> > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.  
> > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744
> 
> Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> 
> We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> bpftool.
I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
the wheel. Any objections?

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[jakub.kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:34:48 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:    
> > > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0    
> > > > 
> > > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.    
> > > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744  
> > 
> > Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> > 
> > We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> > will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> > bpftool.  
> I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
> create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
> single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
> the wheel. Any objections?

Mm.. I'm afraid libbpf needs to keep backward compatibility.  We'd have
to add some way for the user (bpftool code) to request the instance ID
does not appear, but (potential) existing users should keep seeing them.
Perhaps others disagree.

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:34:48 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:    
> > > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0    
> > > > 
> > > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.    
> > > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744  
> > 
> > Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> > 
> > We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> > will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> > bpftool.  
> I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
> create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
> single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
> the wheel. Any objections?

Mm.. I'm afraid libbpf needs to keep backward compatibility.  We'd have
to add some way for the user (bpftool code) to request the instance ID
does not appear, but (potential) existing users should keep seeing them.
Perhaps others disagree.

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:34:48 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:    
> > > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0    
> > > > 
> > > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.    
> > > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744  
> > 
> > Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> > 
> > We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> > will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> > bpftool.  
> I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
> create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
> single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
> the wheel. Any objections?

Mm.. I'm afraid libbpf needs to keep backward compatibility.  We'd have
to add some way for the user (bpftool code) to request the instance ID
does not appear, but (potential) existing users should keep seeing them.
Perhaps others disagree.

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[sdf]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:34:48 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:    
> > > > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0    
> > > > > 
> > > > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.    
> > > > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744  
> > > 
> > > Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> > > 
> > > We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> > > will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> > > bpftool.  
> > I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
> > create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
> > single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
> > the wheel. Any objections?
> 
> Mm.. I'm afraid libbpf needs to keep backward compatibility.  We'd have
> to add some way for the user (bpftool code) to request the instance ID
> does not appear, but (potential) existing users should keep seeing them.
> Perhaps others disagree.
AFAICT, nobody (seriously) uses bpf_object__pin in the kernel tree and I
have a feeling that the situation is the same outside of the kernel tree.
We can revert/work around if we break somebody, I just don't want to
reimplement the same code in bpftool while there is a possibility that
nobody is using that.

I'll post my proposal as v3, let's see whether other people have
the same objections.

Btw, did we officially commit to the libbpf api/abi somewhere? It always
felt to me like an internal and work-in-progress library.

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:34:48 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:    
> > > > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0    
> > > > > 
> > > > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.    
> > > > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744  
> > > 
> > > Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> > > 
> > > We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> > > will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> > > bpftool.  
> > I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
> > create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
> > single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
> > the wheel. Any objections?
> 
> Mm.. I'm afraid libbpf needs to keep backward compatibility.  We'd have
> to add some way for the user (bpftool code) to request the instance ID
> does not appear, but (potential) existing users should keep seeing them.
> Perhaps others disagree.
AFAICT, nobody (seriously) uses bpf_object__pin in the kernel tree and I
have a feeling that the situation is the same outside of the kernel tree.
We can revert/work around if we break somebody, I just don't want to
reimplement the same code in bpftool while there is a possibility that
nobody is using that.

I'll post my proposal as v3, let's see whether other people have
the same objections.

Btw, did we officially commit to the libbpf api/abi somewhere? It always
felt to me like an internal and work-in-progress library.

[PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpftool: support loading flow dissector

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:34:48 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:13:33 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:  
> > > > On 11/07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > > > On Wed,  7 Nov 2018 14:43:56 -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:    
> > > > > > bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/jmp_table \
> > > > > >         key 0 0 0 0 \
> > > > > >         value pinned /sys/fs/bpf/flow/IP/0    
> > > > > 
> > > > > Where is that /0 coming from ?  Is that in source code?  I don't see
> > > > > libbpf adding it, maybe I'm missing something.    
> > > > libbpf adds that, that's a program instance:
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c#n1744  
> > > 
> > > Ugh, I was looking at bpf_object__pin() which uses names :(
> > > 
> > > We never use this multi-instance thing, and I don't think bpftool ever
> > > will, so IMHO it'd be good if we just re-did the pinning loop in
> > > bpftool.  
> > I wonder whether I should just add special case to bpf_program__pin: don't
> > create a subdir when instances.nr == 1 (and just create a file pin for
> > single instance)? In that case I can continue to use libbpf and don't reinvent
> > the wheel. Any objections?
> 
> Mm.. I'm afraid libbpf needs to keep backward compatibility.  We'd have
> to add some way for the user (bpftool code) to request the instance ID
> does not appear, but (potential) existing users should keep seeing them.
> Perhaps others disagree.
AFAICT, nobody (seriously) uses bpf_object__pin in the kernel tree and I
have a feeling that the situation is the same outside of the kernel tree.
We can revert/work around if we break somebody, I just don't want to
reimplement the same code in bpftool while there is a possibility that
nobody is using that.

I'll post my proposal as v3, let's see whether other people have
the same objections.

Btw, did we officially commit to the libbpf api/abi somewhere? It always
felt to me like an internal and work-in-progress library.