From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, keescook@chromium.org, bhe@redhat.com,
indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] x86/boot: Dig out SRAT table from RSDP and find immovable memory
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:43:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113024321.GE7453@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181112205253.ji3fm37haferjpqa@gabell>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:52:54PM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
[...]
>
>> +
>> + ret = cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg));
>> + if (ret == 4 && !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
>> + acpi_use_rsdt = true;
>
>All have to do for ret is checking whether it's above 0, right?
>So how about the following?
>
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) > 0) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
> acpi_use_rsdt = true;
Maybe:
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) == 4) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
> acpi_use_rsdt = true;
looks better. Thanks for your suggestion.
>
>> +
>> + /* Get RSDT or XSDT from RSDP. */
>> + if (!acpi_use_rsdt &&
>> + rsdp->xsdt_physical_address && rsdp->revision > 1) {
>> + root_table = rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
>> + size = ACPI_XSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> + } else {
>> + root_table = rsdp->rsdt_physical_address;
>> + size = ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Get ACPI root table from RSDT or XSDT.*/
>> + header = (struct acpi_table_header *)root_table;
>> + len = header->length;
>> + count = (u32)((len - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)) / size);
>> + entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(u8, header, sizeof(struct acpi_table_header));
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> + u64 address64;
>> +
>> + if (size == ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE)
>> + acpi_table = ((acpi_physical_address)
>> + (*ACPI_CAST_PTR(u32, entry)));
>> + else {
>> + *(u64 *)(void *)&address64 = *(u64 *)(void *)entry;
>> + acpi_table = (acpi_physical_address) address64;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (acpi_table) {
>> + header = (struct acpi_table_header *)acpi_table;
>
>> + signature = header->signature;
>
>this isn't needed.
Yes, will change it.
>
>> +
>> + if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(header->signature, ACPI_SIG_SRAT))
>> + return header;
>> + }
>> + entry += size;
>> + }
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * According to ACPI table, filter the immvoable memory regions
>> + * and store them in immovable_mem[].
>> + */
>> +void get_immovable_mem(void)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_table_header *table_header;
>> + struct acpi_subtable_header *table;
>> + struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma;
>> + unsigned long table_end;
>> + char arg[10];
>> + int i = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>
>> + ret = cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg));
>> + if (ret == 3 && !strncmp(arg, "off", 3))
>> + return;
>
>Same as above.
>
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) > 0) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "off", 3))
> return;
>> +
>> + if (!cmdline_find_option_bool("movable_node"))
>> + return;
>
>I think this check isn't needed.
>The SRAT parsing is needed to the kaslr issue which I'm trying
>to fix. The issue may happen even if movable_node isn't set.
Got it.
>
>> +
>> + table_header = get_acpi_srat_table();
>> + if (!table_header)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + table_end = (unsigned long)table_header + table_header->length;
>> +
>> + table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> + ((unsigned long)table_header + sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat));
>> +
>> + while (((unsigned long)table) +
>> + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < table_end) {
>> + if (table->type == ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY) {
>> + ma = (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)table;
>> + if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE)) {
>> + immovable_mem[i].start = ma->base_address;
>> + immovable_mem[i].size = ma->length;
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (i >= MAX_NUMNODES*2) {
>> + debug_putstr("Too many immovable memory regions, aborted.\n");
>
>I'm not sure this statement gets true actually,
>but if so, should it be set 0 to fallback in process_mem_region()?
That's a good problem.
Well, I don't know what will cause "i >= MAX_NUMNODES*2", maybe some
error in SRAT table or failed to parse table.
Anyway, it's a good idea to set it 0.
Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>Thanks,
>Masa
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> + ((unsigned long)table + table->length);
>> + }
>> + num_immovable_mem = i;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> index 9ed9709d9947..b251572e77af 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> @@ -87,10 +87,6 @@ static unsigned long get_boot_seed(void)
>> #define KASLR_COMPRESSED_BOOT
>> #include "../../lib/kaslr.c"
>>
>> -struct mem_vector {
>> - unsigned long long start;
>> - unsigned long long size;
>> -};
>>
>> /* Only supporting at most 4 unusable memmap regions with kaslr */
>> #define MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS 4
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> index a1d5918765f3..4a3645fda0ed 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ void choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
>> unsigned long *output,
>> unsigned long output_size,
>> unsigned long *virt_addr);
>> +struct mem_vector {
>> + unsigned long long start;
>> + unsigned long long size;
>> +};
>> +
>> /* cpuflags.c */
>> bool has_cpuflag(int flag);
>> #else
>> @@ -116,3 +121,13 @@ static inline void console_init(void)
>> void set_sev_encryption_mask(void);
>>
>> #endif
>> +
>> +/* acpitb.c */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
>> +int num_immovable_mem;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>> +/* Store the amount of immovable memory regions */
>> +#define ACPI_MAX_TABLES 128
>> +void get_immovable_mem(void);
>> +#endif
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.19.1
>>
>>
>>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<hpa@zytor.com>, <keescook@chromium.org>, <bhe@redhat.com>,
<indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>, <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] x86/boot: Dig out SRAT table from RSDP and find immovable memory
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:43:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113024321.GE7453@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181112205253.ji3fm37haferjpqa@gabell>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:52:54PM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
[...]
>
>> +
>> + ret = cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg));
>> + if (ret == 4 && !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
>> + acpi_use_rsdt = true;
>
>All have to do for ret is checking whether it's above 0, right?
>So how about the following?
>
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) > 0) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
> acpi_use_rsdt = true;
Maybe:
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) == 4) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
> acpi_use_rsdt = true;
looks better. Thanks for your suggestion.
>
>> +
>> + /* Get RSDT or XSDT from RSDP. */
>> + if (!acpi_use_rsdt &&
>> + rsdp->xsdt_physical_address && rsdp->revision > 1) {
>> + root_table = rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
>> + size = ACPI_XSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> + } else {
>> + root_table = rsdp->rsdt_physical_address;
>> + size = ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Get ACPI root table from RSDT or XSDT.*/
>> + header = (struct acpi_table_header *)root_table;
>> + len = header->length;
>> + count = (u32)((len - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)) / size);
>> + entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(u8, header, sizeof(struct acpi_table_header));
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> + u64 address64;
>> +
>> + if (size == ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE)
>> + acpi_table = ((acpi_physical_address)
>> + (*ACPI_CAST_PTR(u32, entry)));
>> + else {
>> + *(u64 *)(void *)&address64 = *(u64 *)(void *)entry;
>> + acpi_table = (acpi_physical_address) address64;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (acpi_table) {
>> + header = (struct acpi_table_header *)acpi_table;
>
>> + signature = header->signature;
>
>this isn't needed.
Yes, will change it.
>
>> +
>> + if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(header->signature, ACPI_SIG_SRAT))
>> + return header;
>> + }
>> + entry += size;
>> + }
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * According to ACPI table, filter the immvoable memory regions
>> + * and store them in immovable_mem[].
>> + */
>> +void get_immovable_mem(void)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_table_header *table_header;
>> + struct acpi_subtable_header *table;
>> + struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma;
>> + unsigned long table_end;
>> + char arg[10];
>> + int i = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>
>> + ret = cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg));
>> + if (ret == 3 && !strncmp(arg, "off", 3))
>> + return;
>
>Same as above.
>
> if ((cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) > 0) &&
> !strncmp(arg, "off", 3))
> return;
>> +
>> + if (!cmdline_find_option_bool("movable_node"))
>> + return;
>
>I think this check isn't needed.
>The SRAT parsing is needed to the kaslr issue which I'm trying
>to fix. The issue may happen even if movable_node isn't set.
Got it.
>
>> +
>> + table_header = get_acpi_srat_table();
>> + if (!table_header)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + table_end = (unsigned long)table_header + table_header->length;
>> +
>> + table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> + ((unsigned long)table_header + sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat));
>> +
>> + while (((unsigned long)table) +
>> + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < table_end) {
>> + if (table->type == ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY) {
>> + ma = (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)table;
>> + if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE)) {
>> + immovable_mem[i].start = ma->base_address;
>> + immovable_mem[i].size = ma->length;
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (i >= MAX_NUMNODES*2) {
>> + debug_putstr("Too many immovable memory regions, aborted.\n");
>
>I'm not sure this statement gets true actually,
>but if so, should it be set 0 to fallback in process_mem_region()?
That's a good problem.
Well, I don't know what will cause "i >= MAX_NUMNODES*2", maybe some
error in SRAT table or failed to parse table.
Anyway, it's a good idea to set it 0.
Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>Thanks,
>Masa
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> + ((unsigned long)table + table->length);
>> + }
>> + num_immovable_mem = i;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> index 9ed9709d9947..b251572e77af 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> @@ -87,10 +87,6 @@ static unsigned long get_boot_seed(void)
>> #define KASLR_COMPRESSED_BOOT
>> #include "../../lib/kaslr.c"
>>
>> -struct mem_vector {
>> - unsigned long long start;
>> - unsigned long long size;
>> -};
>>
>> /* Only supporting at most 4 unusable memmap regions with kaslr */
>> #define MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS 4
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> index a1d5918765f3..4a3645fda0ed 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ void choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
>> unsigned long *output,
>> unsigned long output_size,
>> unsigned long *virt_addr);
>> +struct mem_vector {
>> + unsigned long long start;
>> + unsigned long long size;
>> +};
>> +
>> /* cpuflags.c */
>> bool has_cpuflag(int flag);
>> #else
>> @@ -116,3 +121,13 @@ static inline void console_init(void)
>> void set_sev_encryption_mask(void);
>>
>> #endif
>> +
>> +/* acpitb.c */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
>> +int num_immovable_mem;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>> +/* Store the amount of immovable memory regions */
>> +#define ACPI_MAX_TABLES 128
>> +void get_immovable_mem(void);
>> +#endif
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.19.1
>>
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-12 9:46 [PATCH v11 0/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] x86/boot: Add efi_get_rsdp_addr() to dig out RSDP from EFI table Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 14:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-13 1:57 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 1:57 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] x86/boot: Add bios_get_rsdp_addr() to search RSDP in memory Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 15:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-13 2:10 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 2:10 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 10:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-12 9:46 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] x86/boot: Add get_acpi_rsdp() to parse RSDP in cmdlien from kexec Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:50 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:50 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 17:43 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13 2:12 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 2:12 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 16:11 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13 17:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-13 17:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-13 20:06 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13 21:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-14 6:12 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14 6:12 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14 18:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-19 1:16 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-19 1:16 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-14 1:54 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14 1:54 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14 1:59 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14 1:59 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-12 9:46 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] x86/boot: Dig out SRAT table from RSDP and find immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 20:52 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13 2:43 ` Chao Fan [this message]
2018-11-13 2:43 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 21:51 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13 2:45 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 2:45 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-16 11:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-19 2:08 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-19 2:08 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-20 6:18 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-20 6:18 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Walk srat tables to filter " Chao Fan
2018-11-12 9:46 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-16 13:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-19 1:31 ` Chao Fan
2018-11-19 1:31 ` Chao Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113024321.GE7453@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.