All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register() race once more
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:19:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181122161942.GG28270@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181122161031.15179-1-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>

On 11/22, Andrea Parri wrote:
>
> Commit 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() +
> register() race") added the UPROBE_COPY_INSN flag, and corresponding
> smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() memory barriers, to ensure that handle_swbp()
> uses fully-initialized uprobes only.
> 
> However, the smp_rmb() is mis-placed: this barrier should be placed
> after handle_swbp() has tested for the flag, thus guaranteeing that
> (program-order) subsequent loads from the uprobe can see the initial
> stores performed by prepare_uprobe().
> 
> Move the smp_rmb() accordingly.  Also amend the comments associated
> to the two memory barriers to indicate their actual locations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Fixes: 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race")

Thanks,

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>



> ---
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 96d4bee83489b..322e97bbb4370 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static int prepare_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *file,
>  	BUG_ON((uprobe->offset & ~PAGE_MASK) +
>  			UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE);
>  
> -	smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb() in find_active_uprobe() */
> +	smp_wmb(); /* pairs with the smp_rmb() in handle_swbp() */
>  	set_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags);
>  
>   out:
> @@ -2178,10 +2178,18 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	 * After we hit the bp, _unregister + _register can install the
>  	 * new and not-yet-analyzed uprobe at the same address, restart.
>  	 */
> -	smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb() in install_breakpoint() */
>  	if (unlikely(!test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags)))
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in prepare_uprobe().
> +	 *
> +	 * Guarantees that if we see the UPROBE_COPY_INSN bit set, then
> +	 * we must also see the stores to &uprobe->arch performed by the
> +	 * prepare_uprobe() call.
> +	 */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +
>  	/* Tracing handlers use ->utask to communicate with fetch methods */
>  	if (!get_utask())
>  		goto out;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-22 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-22 16:10 [PATCH] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register() race once more Andrea Parri
2018-11-22 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2018-11-22 16:27   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-22 19:38     ` Andrea Parri
2018-11-23  7:34     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-23  7:33 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Andrea Parri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181122161942.GG28270@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.