From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register() race once more
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 20:38:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181122193837.GA3320@andrea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181122162708.GH28270@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 05:27:09PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 11/22, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > >
> > > Commit 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() +
> > > register() race") added the UPROBE_COPY_INSN flag, and corresponding
> > > smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() memory barriers, to ensure that handle_swbp()
> > > uses fully-initialized uprobes only.
> > >
> > > However, the smp_rmb() is mis-placed: this barrier should be placed
> > > after handle_swbp() has tested for the flag, thus guaranteeing that
> > > (program-order) subsequent loads from the uprobe can see the initial
> > > stores performed by prepare_uprobe().
> > >
> > > Move the smp_rmb() accordingly. Also amend the comments associated
> > > to the two memory barriers to indicate their actual locations.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> > > Fixes: 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race")
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Thanks, Oleg.
>
> Yes, but I am not sure this is the -stable material...
I'm inclined to leave it to you/the maintainers in question to decide
about this, ;-) but please let me know if a resend or another action
is needed from me.
Andrea
>
> Oleg.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-22 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-22 16:10 [PATCH] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register() race once more Andrea Parri
2018-11-22 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-22 16:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-22 19:38 ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2018-11-23 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-23 7:33 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Andrea Parri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181122193837.GA3320@andrea \
--to=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.