All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] amd-iommu: cosmetic fixes
@ 2018-11-26  9:05 Paul Durrant
  2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool Paul Durrant
  2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of u<N> with uint<N>_t Paul Durrant
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Durrant @ 2018-11-26  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel; +Cc: Paul Durrant, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

No functional change.

Paul Durrant (2):
  amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool
  amd-iommu: replace occurrences of u<N> with uint<N>_t...

 xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
 
---
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>	    
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool
  2018-11-26  9:05 [PATCH 0/2] amd-iommu: cosmetic fixes Paul Durrant
@ 2018-11-26  9:05 ` Paul Durrant
  2018-11-26  9:38   ` Jan Beulich
  2018-11-26 15:35   ` Woods, Brian
  2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of u<N> with uint<N>_t Paul Durrant
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Durrant @ 2018-11-26  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel; +Cc: Paul Durrant, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

Bring the coding style up to date. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
---
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>
---
 xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c
index c1daba8422..7d5f64794a 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c
@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ static void clear_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long l1_mfn, unsigned long dfn)
     unmap_domain_page(table);
 }
 
-static bool_t set_iommu_pde_present(u32 *pde, unsigned long next_mfn, 
-                                    unsigned int next_level,
-                                    bool_t iw, bool_t ir)
+static bool set_iommu_pde_present(u32 *pde, unsigned long next_mfn,
+                                  unsigned int next_level,
+                                  bool iw, bool ir)
 {
     uint64_t addr_lo, addr_hi, maddr_next;
     u32 entry;
@@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static bool_t set_iommu_pde_present(u32 *pde, unsigned long next_mfn,
     return need_flush;
 }
 
-static bool_t set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long pt_mfn, unsigned long dfn,
-                                    unsigned long next_mfn, int pde_level, 
-                                    bool_t iw, bool_t ir)
+static bool set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long pt_mfn, unsigned long dfn,
+                                  unsigned long next_mfn, int pde_level,
+                                  bool iw, bool ir)
 {
     u64 *table;
     u32 *pde;
-    bool_t need_flush = 0;
+    bool need_flush;
 
     table = map_domain_page(_mfn(pt_mfn));
 
@@ -347,16 +347,16 @@ static void set_pde_count(u64 *pde, unsigned int count)
 /* Return 1, if pages are suitable for merging at merge_level.
  * otherwise increase pde count if mfn is contigous with mfn - 1
  */
-static int iommu_update_pde_count(struct domain *d, unsigned long pt_mfn,
-                                  unsigned long dfn, unsigned long mfn,
-                                  unsigned int merge_level)
+static bool iommu_update_pde_count(struct domain *d, unsigned long pt_mfn,
+                                   unsigned long dfn, unsigned long mfn,
+                                   unsigned int merge_level)
 {
     unsigned int pde_count, next_level;
     unsigned long first_mfn;
     u64 *table, *pde, *ntable;
     u64 ntable_maddr, mask;
     struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d);
-    bool_t ok = 0;
+    bool ok = false;
 
     ASSERT( spin_is_locked(&hd->arch.mapping_lock) && pt_mfn );
 
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static int update_paging_mode(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn)
 int amd_iommu_map_page(struct domain *d, dfn_t dfn, mfn_t mfn,
                        unsigned int flags)
 {
-    bool_t need_flush = 0;
+    bool need_flush = false;
     struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d);
     int rc;
     unsigned long pt_mfn[7];
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of u<N> with uint<N>_t...
  2018-11-26  9:05 [PATCH 0/2] amd-iommu: cosmetic fixes Paul Durrant
  2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool Paul Durrant
@ 2018-11-26  9:05 ` Paul Durrant
  2018-11-26  9:45   ` Jan Beulich
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Durrant @ 2018-11-26  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel; +Cc: Paul Durrant, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

...for N in {8, 16, 32, 64}.

Bring the coding style up to date. No functional change.

Also, while in the neighbourhood, fix some tabs.

Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
---
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>
---
 xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c
index 7d5f64794a..b797a5b5de 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static unsigned int pfn_to_pde_idx(unsigned long pfn, unsigned int level)
 
 static void clear_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long l1_mfn, unsigned long dfn)
 {
-    u64 *table, *pte;
+    uint64_t *table, *pte;
 
     table = map_domain_page(_mfn(l1_mfn));
     pte = table + pfn_to_pde_idx(dfn, 1);
@@ -45,15 +45,15 @@ static void clear_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long l1_mfn, unsigned long dfn)
     unmap_domain_page(table);
 }
 
-static bool set_iommu_pde_present(u32 *pde, unsigned long next_mfn,
+static bool set_iommu_pde_present(uint32_t *pde, unsigned long next_mfn,
                                   unsigned int next_level,
                                   bool iw, bool ir)
 {
     uint64_t addr_lo, addr_hi, maddr_next;
-    u32 entry;
+    uint32_t entry;
     bool need_flush = false, old_present;
 
-    maddr_next = (u64)next_mfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+    maddr_next = (uint64_t)next_mfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 
     old_present = get_field_from_reg_u32(pde[0], IOMMU_PTE_PRESENT_MASK,
                                          IOMMU_PTE_PRESENT_SHIFT);
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static bool set_iommu_pde_present(u32 *pde, unsigned long next_mfn,
     addr_hi = maddr_next >> 32;
 
     /* enable read/write permissions,which will be enforced at the PTE */
-    set_field_in_reg_u32((u32)addr_hi, 0,
+    set_field_in_reg_u32((uint32_t)addr_hi, 0,
                          IOMMU_PDE_ADDR_HIGH_MASK,
                          IOMMU_PDE_ADDR_HIGH_SHIFT, &entry);
     set_field_in_reg_u32(iw, entry,
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static bool set_iommu_pde_present(u32 *pde, unsigned long next_mfn,
     pde[1] = entry;
 
     /* mark next level as 'present' */
-    set_field_in_reg_u32((u32)addr_lo >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0,
+    set_field_in_reg_u32((uint32_t)addr_lo >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0,
                          IOMMU_PDE_ADDR_LOW_MASK,
                          IOMMU_PDE_ADDR_LOW_SHIFT, &entry);
     set_field_in_reg_u32(next_level, entry,
@@ -127,24 +127,25 @@ static bool set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long pt_mfn, unsigned long dfn,
                                   unsigned long next_mfn, int pde_level,
                                   bool iw, bool ir)
 {
-    u64 *table;
-    u32 *pde;
+    uint64_t *table;
+    uint32_t *pde;
     bool need_flush;
 
     table = map_domain_page(_mfn(pt_mfn));
 
-    pde = (u32*)(table + pfn_to_pde_idx(dfn, pde_level));
+    pde = (uint32_t*)(table + pfn_to_pde_idx(dfn, pde_level));
 
     need_flush = set_iommu_pde_present(pde, next_mfn, 0, iw, ir);
     unmap_domain_page(table);
     return need_flush;
 }
 
-void amd_iommu_set_root_page_table(
-    u32 *dte, u64 root_ptr, u16 domain_id, u8 paging_mode, u8 valid)
+void amd_iommu_set_root_page_table(uint32_t *dte, uint64_t root_ptr,
+                                   uint16_t domain_id, uint8_t paging_mode,
+                                   uint8_t valid)
 {
-    u64 addr_hi, addr_lo;
-    u32 entry;
+    uint64_t addr_hi, addr_lo;
+    uint32_t entry;
     set_field_in_reg_u32(domain_id, 0,
                          IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_DOMAIN_ID_MASK,
                          IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_DOMAIN_ID_SHIFT, &entry);
@@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ void amd_iommu_set_root_page_table(
     addr_lo = root_ptr & DMA_32BIT_MASK;
     addr_hi = root_ptr >> 32;
 
-    set_field_in_reg_u32((u32)addr_hi, 0,
+    set_field_in_reg_u32((uint32_t)addr_hi, 0,
                          IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_PAGE_TABLE_PTR_HIGH_MASK,
                          IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_PAGE_TABLE_PTR_HIGH_SHIFT, &entry);
     set_field_in_reg_u32(IOMMU_CONTROL_ENABLED, entry,
@@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ void amd_iommu_set_root_page_table(
                          IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_IO_READ_PERMISSION_SHIFT, &entry);
     dte[1] = entry;
 
-    set_field_in_reg_u32((u32)addr_lo >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0,
+    set_field_in_reg_u32((uint32_t)addr_lo >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0,
                          IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_PAGE_TABLE_PTR_LOW_MASK,
                          IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_PAGE_TABLE_PTR_LOW_SHIFT, &entry);
     set_field_in_reg_u32(paging_mode, entry,
@@ -180,9 +181,9 @@ void amd_iommu_set_root_page_table(
     dte[0] = entry;
 }
 
-void iommu_dte_set_iotlb(u32 *dte, u8 i)
+void iommu_dte_set_iotlb(uint32_t *dte, uint8_t i)
 {
-    u32 entry;
+    uint32_t entry;
 
     entry = dte[3];
     set_field_in_reg_u32(!!i, entry,
@@ -192,27 +193,27 @@ void iommu_dte_set_iotlb(u32 *dte, u8 i)
 }
 
 void __init amd_iommu_set_intremap_table(
-    u32 *dte, u64 intremap_ptr, u8 int_valid)
+    uint32_t *dte, uint64_t intremap_ptr, uint8_t int_valid)
 {
-    u64 addr_hi, addr_lo;
-    u32 entry;
+    uint64_t addr_hi, addr_lo;
+    uint32_t entry;
 
     addr_lo = intremap_ptr & DMA_32BIT_MASK;
     addr_hi = intremap_ptr >> 32;
 
     entry = dte[5];
-    set_field_in_reg_u32((u32)addr_hi, entry,
-                        IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_PTR_HIGH_MASK,
-                        IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_PTR_HIGH_SHIFT, &entry);
+    set_field_in_reg_u32((uint32_t)addr_hi, entry,
+                         IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_PTR_HIGH_MASK,
+                         IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_PTR_HIGH_SHIFT, &entry);
     /* Fixed and arbitrated interrupts remapepd */
     set_field_in_reg_u32(2, entry,
-                        IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_CONTROL_MASK,
-                        IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_CONTROL_SHIFT, &entry);
+                         IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_CONTROL_MASK,
+                         IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_CONTROL_SHIFT, &entry);
     dte[5] = entry;
 
-    set_field_in_reg_u32((u32)addr_lo >> 6, 0,
-                        IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_PTR_LOW_MASK,
-                        IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_PTR_LOW_SHIFT, &entry);
+    set_field_in_reg_u32((uint32_t)addr_lo >> 6, 0,
+                         IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_PTR_LOW_MASK,
+                         IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_PTR_LOW_SHIFT, &entry);
     /* 2048 entries */
     set_field_in_reg_u32(0xB, entry,
                          IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_INT_TABLE_LENGTH_MASK,
@@ -229,11 +230,12 @@ void __init amd_iommu_set_intremap_table(
     dte[4] = entry;
 }
 
-void __init iommu_dte_add_device_entry(u32 *dte, struct ivrs_mappings *ivrs_dev)
+void __init iommu_dte_add_device_entry(uint32_t *dte,
+                                       struct ivrs_mappings *ivrs_dev)
 {
-    u32 entry;
-    u8 sys_mgt, dev_ex, flags;
-    u8 mask = ~(0x7 << 3);
+    uint32_t entry;
+    uint8_t sys_mgt, dev_ex, flags;
+    uint8_t mask = ~(0x7 << 3);
 
     dte[7] = dte[6] = dte[4] = dte[2] = dte[1] = dte[0] = 0;
 
@@ -256,10 +258,10 @@ void __init iommu_dte_add_device_entry(u32 *dte, struct ivrs_mappings *ivrs_dev)
     dte[3] = entry;
 }
 
-void iommu_dte_set_guest_cr3(u32 *dte, u16 dom_id, u64 gcr3,
+void iommu_dte_set_guest_cr3(uint32_t *dte, uint16_t dom_id, uint64_t gcr3,
                              int gv, unsigned int glx)
 {
-    u32 entry, gcr3_1, gcr3_2, gcr3_3;
+    uint32_t entry, gcr3_1, gcr3_2, gcr3_3;
 
     gcr3_3 = gcr3 >> 31;
     gcr3_2 = (gcr3 >> 15) & 0xFFFF;
@@ -323,22 +325,22 @@ uint64_t amd_iommu_get_address_from_pte(void *pte)
 /* For each pde, We use ignored bits (bit 1 - bit 8 and bit 63)
  * to save pde count, pde count = 511 is a candidate of page coalescing.
  */
-static unsigned int get_pde_count(u64 pde)
+static unsigned int get_pde_count(uint64_t pde)
 {
     unsigned int count;
-    u64 upper_mask = 1ULL << 63 ;
-    u64 lower_mask = 0xFF << 1;
+    uint64_t upper_mask = 1ULL << 63 ;
+    uint64_t lower_mask = 0xFF << 1;
 
     count = ((pde & upper_mask) >> 55) | ((pde & lower_mask) >> 1);
     return count;
 }
 
 /* Convert pde count into iommu pte ignored bits */
-static void set_pde_count(u64 *pde, unsigned int count)
+static void set_pde_count(uint64_t *pde, unsigned int count)
 {
-    u64 upper_mask = 1ULL << 8 ;
-    u64 lower_mask = 0xFF;
-    u64 pte_mask = (~(1ULL << 63)) & (~(0xFF << 1));
+    uint64_t upper_mask = 1ULL << 8 ;
+    uint64_t lower_mask = 0xFF;
+    uint64_t pte_mask = (~(1ULL << 63)) & (~(0xFF << 1));
 
     *pde &= pte_mask;
     *pde |= ((count & upper_mask ) << 55) | ((count & lower_mask ) << 1);
@@ -353,8 +355,8 @@ static bool iommu_update_pde_count(struct domain *d, unsigned long pt_mfn,
 {
     unsigned int pde_count, next_level;
     unsigned long first_mfn;
-    u64 *table, *pde, *ntable;
-    u64 ntable_maddr, mask;
+    uint64_t *table, *pde, *ntable;
+    uint64_t ntable_maddr, mask;
     struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d);
     bool ok = false;
 
@@ -407,8 +409,8 @@ static int iommu_merge_pages(struct domain *d, unsigned long pt_mfn,
                              unsigned long dfn, unsigned int flags,
                              unsigned int merge_level)
 {
-    u64 *table, *pde, *ntable;
-    u64 ntable_mfn;
+    uint64_t *table, *pde, *ntable;
+    uint64_t ntable_mfn;
     unsigned long first_mfn;
     struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d);
 
@@ -437,7 +439,7 @@ static int iommu_merge_pages(struct domain *d, unsigned long pt_mfn,
     }
 
     /* setup super page mapping, next level = 0 */
-    set_iommu_pde_present((u32*)pde, first_mfn, 0,
+    set_iommu_pde_present((uint32_t*)pde, first_mfn, 0,
                           !!(flags & IOMMUF_writable),
                           !!(flags & IOMMUF_readable));
 
@@ -455,7 +457,7 @@ static int iommu_merge_pages(struct domain *d, unsigned long pt_mfn,
 static int iommu_pde_from_dfn(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn,
                               unsigned long pt_mfn[])
 {
-    u64 *pde, *next_table_vaddr;
+    uint64_t *pde, *next_table_vaddr;
     unsigned long  next_table_mfn;
     unsigned int level;
     struct page_info *table;
@@ -486,8 +488,8 @@ static int iommu_pde_from_dfn(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn,
         next_table_mfn = amd_iommu_get_address_from_pte(pde) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
         /* Split super page frame into smaller pieces.*/
-        if ( iommu_is_pte_present((u32*)pde) &&
-             (iommu_next_level((u32*)pde) == 0) &&
+        if ( iommu_is_pte_present((uint32_t*)pde) &&
+             (iommu_next_level((uint32_t*)pde) == 0) &&
              next_table_mfn != 0 )
         {
             int i;
@@ -508,7 +510,7 @@ static int iommu_pde_from_dfn(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn,
             }
 
             next_table_mfn = mfn_x(page_to_mfn(table));
-            set_iommu_pde_present((u32*)pde, next_table_mfn, next_level, 
+            set_iommu_pde_present((uint32_t*)pde, next_table_mfn, next_level,
                                   !!IOMMUF_writable, !!IOMMUF_readable);
 
             for ( i = 0; i < PTE_PER_TABLE_SIZE; i++ )
@@ -523,7 +525,7 @@ static int iommu_pde_from_dfn(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn,
         }
 
         /* Install lower level page table for non-present entries */
-        else if ( !iommu_is_pte_present((u32*)pde) )
+        else if ( !iommu_is_pte_present((uint32_t*)pde) )
         {
             if ( next_table_mfn == 0 )
             {
@@ -535,8 +537,9 @@ static int iommu_pde_from_dfn(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn,
                     return 1;
                 }
                 next_table_mfn = mfn_x(page_to_mfn(table));
-                set_iommu_pde_present((u32*)pde, next_table_mfn, next_level,
-                                      !!IOMMUF_writable, !!IOMMUF_readable);
+                set_iommu_pde_present((uint32_t*)pde, next_table_mfn,
+                                      next_level, !!IOMMUF_writable,
+                                      !!IOMMUF_readable);
             }
             else /* should never reach here */
             {
@@ -556,7 +559,7 @@ static int iommu_pde_from_dfn(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn,
 
 static int update_paging_mode(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn)
 {
-    u16 bdf;
+    uint16_t bdf;
     void *device_entry;
     unsigned int req_id, level, offset;
     unsigned long flags;
@@ -627,7 +630,7 @@ static int update_paging_mode(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn)
                                (req_id * IOMMU_DEV_TABLE_ENTRY_SIZE);
 
                 /* valid = 0 only works for dom0 passthrough mode */
-                amd_iommu_set_root_page_table((u32 *)device_entry,
+                amd_iommu_set_root_page_table((uint32_t *)device_entry,
                                               page_to_maddr(hd->arch.root_table),
                                               d->domain_id,
                                               hd->arch.paging_mode, 1);
@@ -805,7 +808,7 @@ int amd_iommu_unmap_page(struct domain *d, dfn_t dfn)
 }
 
 int amd_iommu_reserve_domain_unity_map(struct domain *domain,
-                                       u64 phys_addr,
+                                       uint64_t phys_addr,
                                        unsigned long size, int iw, int ir)
 {
     unsigned long npages, i;
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool
  2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool Paul Durrant
@ 2018-11-26  9:38   ` Jan Beulich
  2018-11-26  9:40     ` Paul Durrant
  2018-11-26 15:35   ` Woods, Brian
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2018-11-26  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Durrant; +Cc: xen-devel, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

>>> On 26.11.18 at 10:05, <paul.durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> @@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static bool_t set_iommu_pde_present(u32 *pde, unsigned long next_mfn,
>      return need_flush;
>  }
>  
> -static bool_t set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long pt_mfn, unsigned long dfn,
> -                                    unsigned long next_mfn, int pde_level, 
> -                                    bool_t iw, bool_t ir)
> +static bool set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long pt_mfn, unsigned long dfn,
> +                                  unsigned long next_mfn, int pde_level,
> +                                  bool iw, bool ir)
>  {
>      u64 *table;
>      u32 *pde;
> -    bool_t need_flush = 0;
> +    bool need_flush;

You validly drop the initializer here (even if this makes the "no
functional change" assertion un-obvious without looking at the
entire function), but you don't do so in update_paging_mode().
Is there any particular reason?

> @@ -347,16 +347,16 @@ static void set_pde_count(u64 *pde, unsigned int count)
>  /* Return 1, if pages are suitable for merging at merge_level.
>   * otherwise increase pde count if mfn is contigous with mfn - 1
>   */
> -static int iommu_update_pde_count(struct domain *d, unsigned long pt_mfn,
> -                                  unsigned long dfn, unsigned long mfn,
> -                                  unsigned int merge_level)
> +static bool iommu_update_pde_count(struct domain *d, unsigned long pt_mfn,
> +                                   unsigned long dfn, unsigned long mfn,
> +                                   unsigned int merge_level)
>  {
>      unsigned int pde_count, next_level;
>      unsigned long first_mfn;
>      u64 *table, *pde, *ntable;
>      u64 ntable_maddr, mask;
>      struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d);
> -    bool_t ok = 0;
> +    bool ok = false;

There's "ok = 1" downwards in this function, which I think you
should adjust as well.

With these adjustments
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool
  2018-11-26  9:38   ` Jan Beulich
@ 2018-11-26  9:40     ` Paul Durrant
  2018-11-26  9:50       ` Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Durrant @ 2018-11-26  9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jan Beulich'; +Cc: xen-devel, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: 26 November 2018 09:39
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>; Suravee Suthikulpanit
> <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>; xen-devel <xen-
> devel@lists.xenproject.org>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of
> bool_t with bool
> 
> >>> On 26.11.18 at 10:05, <paul.durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> > @@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static bool_t set_iommu_pde_present(u32 *pde,
> unsigned long next_mfn,
> >      return need_flush;
> >  }
> >
> > -static bool_t set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long pt_mfn, unsigned long
> dfn,
> > -                                    unsigned long next_mfn, int
> pde_level,
> > -                                    bool_t iw, bool_t ir)
> > +static bool set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long pt_mfn, unsigned long
> dfn,
> > +                                  unsigned long next_mfn, int
> pde_level,
> > +                                  bool iw, bool ir)
> >  {
> >      u64 *table;
> >      u32 *pde;
> > -    bool_t need_flush = 0;
> > +    bool need_flush;
> 
> You validly drop the initializer here (even if this makes the "no
> functional change" assertion un-obvious without looking at the
> entire function), but you don't do so in update_paging_mode().
> Is there any particular reason?

No, I just missed it.

> 
> > @@ -347,16 +347,16 @@ static void set_pde_count(u64 *pde, unsigned int
> count)
> >  /* Return 1, if pages are suitable for merging at merge_level.
> >   * otherwise increase pde count if mfn is contigous with mfn - 1
> >   */
> > -static int iommu_update_pde_count(struct domain *d, unsigned long
> pt_mfn,
> > -                                  unsigned long dfn, unsigned long mfn,
> > -                                  unsigned int merge_level)
> > +static bool iommu_update_pde_count(struct domain *d, unsigned long
> pt_mfn,
> > +                                   unsigned long dfn, unsigned long
> mfn,
> > +                                   unsigned int merge_level)
> >  {
> >      unsigned int pde_count, next_level;
> >      unsigned long first_mfn;
> >      u64 *table, *pde, *ntable;
> >      u64 ntable_maddr, mask;
> >      struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d);
> > -    bool_t ok = 0;
> > +    bool ok = false;
> 
> There's "ok = 1" downwards in this function, which I think you
> should adjust as well.

Yes, indeed.

> 
> With these adjustments
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 

Thanks. Are you happy to fix up on commit or would you like a v2?

  Paul

> Jan
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of u<N> with uint<N>_t...
  2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of u<N> with uint<N>_t Paul Durrant
@ 2018-11-26  9:45   ` Jan Beulich
  2018-11-26  9:55     ` Paul Durrant
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2018-11-26  9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Durrant; +Cc: xen-devel, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

>>> On 26.11.18 at 10:05, <paul.durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> @@ -127,24 +127,25 @@ static bool set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long pt_mfn, unsigned long dfn,
>                                    unsigned long next_mfn, int pde_level,
>                                    bool iw, bool ir)
>  {
> -    u64 *table;
> -    u32 *pde;
> +    uint64_t *table;
> +    uint32_t *pde;
>      bool need_flush;
>  
>      table = map_domain_page(_mfn(pt_mfn));
>  
> -    pde = (u32*)(table + pfn_to_pde_idx(dfn, pde_level));
> +    pde = (uint32_t*)(table + pfn_to_pde_idx(dfn, pde_level));

Please add the missing blank here at the same time.

> @@ -229,11 +230,12 @@ void __init amd_iommu_set_intremap_table(
>      dte[4] = entry;
>  }
>  
> -void __init iommu_dte_add_device_entry(u32 *dte, struct ivrs_mappings 
> *ivrs_dev)
> +void __init iommu_dte_add_device_entry(uint32_t *dte,
> +                                       struct ivrs_mappings *ivrs_dev)
>  {
> -    u32 entry;
> -    u8 sys_mgt, dev_ex, flags;
> -    u8 mask = ~(0x7 << 3);
> +    uint32_t entry;
> +    uint8_t sys_mgt, dev_ex, flags;
> +    uint8_t mask = ~(0x7 << 3);

I question the use of 8-bit fixed width types here.

> @@ -486,8 +488,8 @@ static int iommu_pde_from_dfn(struct domain *d, unsigned long dfn,
>          next_table_mfn = amd_iommu_get_address_from_pte(pde) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
>          /* Split super page frame into smaller pieces.*/
> -        if ( iommu_is_pte_present((u32*)pde) &&
> -             (iommu_next_level((u32*)pde) == 0) &&
> +        if ( iommu_is_pte_present((uint32_t*)pde) &&
> +             (iommu_next_level((uint32_t*)pde) == 0) &&

Blanks to be added again. More further down.

> @@ -805,7 +808,7 @@ int amd_iommu_unmap_page(struct domain *d, dfn_t dfn)
>  }
>  
>  int amd_iommu_reserve_domain_unity_map(struct domain *domain,
> -                                       u64 phys_addr,
> +                                       uint64_t phys_addr,

Transformations like this are also a little odd to see - why not switch
to paddr_t at this occasion?

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool
  2018-11-26  9:40     ` Paul Durrant
@ 2018-11-26  9:50       ` Jan Beulich
  2018-11-26  9:52         ` Paul Durrant
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2018-11-26  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Durrant; +Cc: xen-devel, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

>>> On 26.11.18 at 10:40, <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> Thanks. Are you happy to fix up on commit or would you like a v2?

To be honest in this case I'd prefer a v2.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool
  2018-11-26  9:50       ` Jan Beulich
@ 2018-11-26  9:52         ` Paul Durrant
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Durrant @ 2018-11-26  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jan Beulich'; +Cc: xen-devel, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: 26 November 2018 09:51
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>; Suravee Suthikulpanit
> <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>; xen-devel <xen-
> devel@lists.xenproject.org>
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of
> bool_t with bool
> 
> >>> On 26.11.18 at 10:40, <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Thanks. Are you happy to fix up on commit or would you like a v2?
> 
> To be honest in this case I'd prefer a v2.
> 

Ok, sure. Since I need to make adjustments to patch #2 that's no problem.

  Paul

> Jan
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of u<N> with uint<N>_t...
  2018-11-26  9:45   ` Jan Beulich
@ 2018-11-26  9:55     ` Paul Durrant
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Durrant @ 2018-11-26  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jan Beulich'; +Cc: xen-devel, Brian Woods, Suravee Suthikulpanit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: 26 November 2018 09:46
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>; Suravee Suthikulpanit
> <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>; xen-devel <xen-
> devel@lists.xenproject.org>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of
> u<N> with uint<N>_t...
> 
> >>> On 26.11.18 at 10:05, <paul.durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> > @@ -127,24 +127,25 @@ static bool set_iommu_pte_present(unsigned long
> pt_mfn, unsigned long dfn,
> >                                    unsigned long next_mfn, int
> pde_level,
> >                                    bool iw, bool ir)
> >  {
> > -    u64 *table;
> > -    u32 *pde;
> > +    uint64_t *table;
> > +    uint32_t *pde;
> >      bool need_flush;
> >
> >      table = map_domain_page(_mfn(pt_mfn));
> >
> > -    pde = (u32*)(table + pfn_to_pde_idx(dfn, pde_level));
> > +    pde = (uint32_t*)(table + pfn_to_pde_idx(dfn, pde_level));
> 
> Please add the missing blank here at the same time.

Ok.

> 
> > @@ -229,11 +230,12 @@ void __init amd_iommu_set_intremap_table(
> >      dte[4] = entry;
> >  }
> >
> > -void __init iommu_dte_add_device_entry(u32 *dte, struct ivrs_mappings
> > *ivrs_dev)
> > +void __init iommu_dte_add_device_entry(uint32_t *dte,
> > +                                       struct ivrs_mappings *ivrs_dev)
> >  {
> > -    u32 entry;
> > -    u8 sys_mgt, dev_ex, flags;
> > -    u8 mask = ~(0x7 << 3);
> > +    uint32_t entry;
> > +    uint8_t sys_mgt, dev_ex, flags;
> > +    uint8_t mask = ~(0x7 << 3);
> 
> I question the use of 8-bit fixed width types here.

I was trying to keep this as mechanical as possible, and certainly non-functional so I don't really want to go messing with the choice of types in this patch.

> 
> > @@ -486,8 +488,8 @@ static int iommu_pde_from_dfn(struct domain *d,
> unsigned long dfn,
> >          next_table_mfn = amd_iommu_get_address_from_pte(pde) >>
> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >
> >          /* Split super page frame into smaller pieces.*/
> > -        if ( iommu_is_pte_present((u32*)pde) &&
> > -             (iommu_next_level((u32*)pde) == 0) &&
> > +        if ( iommu_is_pte_present((uint32_t*)pde) &&
> > +             (iommu_next_level((uint32_t*)pde) == 0) &&
> 
> Blanks to be added again. More further down.
> 

Ok.

> > @@ -805,7 +808,7 @@ int amd_iommu_unmap_page(struct domain *d, dfn_t
> dfn)
> >  }
> >
> >  int amd_iommu_reserve_domain_unity_map(struct domain *domain,
> > -                                       u64 phys_addr,
> > +                                       uint64_t phys_addr,
> 
> Transformations like this are also a little odd to see - why not switch
> to paddr_t at this occasion?
> 

Again, trying to keep the changes in this patch basically mechanical, but moving to an abstract type here seems like a reasonably obvious tweak.

  Paul

> Jan
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool
  2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool Paul Durrant
  2018-11-26  9:38   ` Jan Beulich
@ 2018-11-26 15:35   ` Woods, Brian
  2018-11-26 15:37     ` Woods, Brian
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Woods, Brian @ 2018-11-26 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Durrant
  Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Woods, Brian,
	Suthikulpanit, Suravee

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:05:25AM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Bring the coding style up to date. No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>

Acked-by: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>

-- 
Brian Woods

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool
  2018-11-26 15:35   ` Woods, Brian
@ 2018-11-26 15:37     ` Woods, Brian
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Woods, Brian @ 2018-11-26 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Durrant
  Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Woods, Brian,
	Suthikulpanit, Suravee

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:35:26AM -0600, Brian Woods wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:05:25AM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > Bring the coding style up to date. No functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>
> 
> -- 
> Brian Woods

Meant for another patch, please ignore this one.

-- 
Brian Woods

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-26 15:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-26  9:05 [PATCH 0/2] amd-iommu: cosmetic fixes Paul Durrant
2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of bool_t with bool Paul Durrant
2018-11-26  9:38   ` Jan Beulich
2018-11-26  9:40     ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-26  9:50       ` Jan Beulich
2018-11-26  9:52         ` Paul Durrant
2018-11-26 15:35   ` Woods, Brian
2018-11-26 15:37     ` Woods, Brian
2018-11-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] amd-iommu: replace occurrences of u<N> with uint<N>_t Paul Durrant
2018-11-26  9:45   ` Jan Beulich
2018-11-26  9:55     ` Paul Durrant

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.