All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sh: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:10:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203161052.GA4244@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543852035-26634-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Mike.

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:47:12PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and
> then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock
> function that returns a virtual address.
> 
> There is a small functional change in the allocation of then NODE_DATA().
> Instead of panicing if the local allocation failed, the non-local
> allocation attempt will be made.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/mm/init.c | 18 +++++-------------
>  arch/sh/mm/numa.c |  5 ++---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index c8c13c77..3576b5f 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -192,24 +192,16 @@ void __init page_table_range_init(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>  void __init allocate_pgdat(unsigned int nid)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	unsigned long phys;
> -#endif
>  
>  	get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	/* Retry with all of system memory */
> -	if (!phys)
> -		phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -					SMP_CACHE_BYTES, memblock_end_of_DRAM());
> -	if (!phys)
> +	NODE_DATA(nid) = memblock_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(
> +				sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> +				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
> +				MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> +	if (!NODE_DATA(nid))
>  		panic("Can't allocate pgdat for node %d\n", nid);
> -
> -	NODE_DATA(nid) = __va(phys);
> -	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(struct pglist_data));
The new code will always assign NODE_DATA(nid), where the old
code only assigned NODE_DATA(nid) in the good case.
I dunno if this is an issue, just noticed the difference and
wanted to point it out.

	Sam

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v2 3/6] sh: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:10:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203161052.GA4244@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543852035-26634-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Mike.

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:47:12PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and
> then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock
> function that returns a virtual address.
> 
> There is a small functional change in the allocation of then NODE_DATA().
> Instead of panicing if the local allocation failed, the non-local
> allocation attempt will be made.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/mm/init.c | 18 +++++-------------
>  arch/sh/mm/numa.c |  5 ++---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index c8c13c77..3576b5f 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -192,24 +192,16 @@ void __init page_table_range_init(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>  void __init allocate_pgdat(unsigned int nid)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	unsigned long phys;
> -#endif
>  
>  	get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	/* Retry with all of system memory */
> -	if (!phys)
> -		phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -					SMP_CACHE_BYTES, memblock_end_of_DRAM());
> -	if (!phys)
> +	NODE_DATA(nid) = memblock_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(
> +				sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> +				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
> +				MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> +	if (!NODE_DATA(nid))
>  		panic("Can't allocate pgdat for node %d\n", nid);
> -
> -	NODE_DATA(nid) = __va(phys);
> -	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(struct pglist_data));
The new code will always assign NODE_DATA(nid), where the old
code only assigned NODE_DATA(nid) in the good case.
I dunno if this is an issue, just noticed the difference and
wanted to point it out.

	Sam

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sh: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:10:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203161052.GA4244@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543852035-26634-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Mike.

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:47:12PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and
> then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock
> function that returns a virtual address.
> 
> There is a small functional change in the allocation of then NODE_DATA().
> Instead of panicing if the local allocation failed, the non-local
> allocation attempt will be made.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/mm/init.c | 18 +++++-------------
>  arch/sh/mm/numa.c |  5 ++---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index c8c13c77..3576b5f 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -192,24 +192,16 @@ void __init page_table_range_init(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>  void __init allocate_pgdat(unsigned int nid)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	unsigned long phys;
> -#endif
>  
>  	get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	/* Retry with all of system memory */
> -	if (!phys)
> -		phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -					SMP_CACHE_BYTES, memblock_end_of_DRAM());
> -	if (!phys)
> +	NODE_DATA(nid) = memblock_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(
> +				sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> +				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
> +				MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> +	if (!NODE_DATA(nid))
>  		panic("Can't allocate pgdat for node %d\n", nid);
> -
> -	NODE_DATA(nid) = __va(phys);
> -	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(struct pglist_data));
The new code will always assign NODE_DATA(nid), where the old
code only assigned NODE_DATA(nid) in the good case.
I dunno if this is an issue, just noticed the difference and
wanted to point it out.

	Sam

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sh: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:10:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203161052.GA4244@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543852035-26634-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Mike.

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:47:12PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and
> then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock
> function that returns a virtual address.
> 
> There is a small functional change in the allocation of then NODE_DATA().
> Instead of panicing if the local allocation failed, the non-local
> allocation attempt will be made.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/mm/init.c | 18 +++++-------------
>  arch/sh/mm/numa.c |  5 ++---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index c8c13c77..3576b5f 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -192,24 +192,16 @@ void __init page_table_range_init(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>  void __init allocate_pgdat(unsigned int nid)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	unsigned long phys;
> -#endif
>  
>  	get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	/* Retry with all of system memory */
> -	if (!phys)
> -		phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -					SMP_CACHE_BYTES, memblock_end_of_DRAM());
> -	if (!phys)
> +	NODE_DATA(nid) = memblock_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(
> +				sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> +				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
> +				MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> +	if (!NODE_DATA(nid))
>  		panic("Can't allocate pgdat for node %d\n", nid);
> -
> -	NODE_DATA(nid) = __va(phys);
> -	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(struct pglist_data));
The new code will always assign NODE_DATA(nid), where the old
code only assigned NODE_DATA(nid) in the good case.
I dunno if this is an issue, just noticed the difference and
wanted to point it out.

	Sam

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sh: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:10:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203161052.GA4244@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543852035-26634-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Mike.

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:47:12PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and
> then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock
> function that returns a virtual address.
> 
> There is a small functional change in the allocation of then NODE_DATA().
> Instead of panicing if the local allocation failed, the non-local
> allocation attempt will be made.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/mm/init.c | 18 +++++-------------
>  arch/sh/mm/numa.c |  5 ++---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index c8c13c77..3576b5f 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -192,24 +192,16 @@ void __init page_table_range_init(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>  void __init allocate_pgdat(unsigned int nid)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	unsigned long phys;
> -#endif
>  
>  	get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -	phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	/* Retry with all of system memory */
> -	if (!phys)
> -		phys = __memblock_alloc_base(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> -					SMP_CACHE_BYTES, memblock_end_of_DRAM());
> -	if (!phys)
> +	NODE_DATA(nid) = memblock_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(
> +				sizeof(struct pglist_data),
> +				SMP_CACHE_BYTES, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
> +				MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> +	if (!NODE_DATA(nid))
>  		panic("Can't allocate pgdat for node %d\n", nid);
> -
> -	NODE_DATA(nid) = __va(phys);
> -	memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(struct pglist_data));
The new code will always assign NODE_DATA(nid), where the old
code only assigned NODE_DATA(nid) in the good case.
I dunno if this is an issue, just noticed the difference and
wanted to point it out.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-03 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-03 15:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] memblock: simplify several early memory allocation Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc: prefer memblock APIs returning virtual address Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-04  9:59   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-04  9:59     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-04  9:59     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-04  9:59     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-04  9:59     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-04  9:59     ` [OpenRISC] " Michael Ellerman
2018-12-04 17:13     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-04 17:13       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-04 17:13       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-04 17:13       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-04 17:13       ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-05 12:37       ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-05 12:37         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-05 12:37         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-05 12:37         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-05 12:37         ` [OpenRISC] " Michael Ellerman
2018-12-05 21:22         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-05 21:22           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-05 21:22           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-05 21:22           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-05 21:22           ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] microblaze: prefer memblock API " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-05 15:29   ` Michal Simek
2018-12-05 15:29     ` Michal Simek
2018-12-05 15:29     ` Michal Simek
2018-12-05 15:29     ` Michal Simek
2018-12-05 15:29     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Simek
2018-12-06  7:31     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06  7:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06  7:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06  7:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06  7:31       ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sh: prefer memblock APIs " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:10   ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2018-12-03 16:10     ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:10     ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:10     ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:10     ` [OpenRISC] " Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:28     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:28       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:28       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:28       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:28       ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] openrisc: simplify pte_alloc_one_kernel() Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arch: simplify several early memory allocations Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:29   ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:29     ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:29     ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:29     ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:29     ` [OpenRISC] " Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-03 16:49     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:49       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:49       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:49       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:49       ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06 18:08       ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-06 18:08         ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-06 18:08         ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-06 18:08         ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-06 18:08         ` [OpenRISC] " Sam Ravnborg
2018-12-06 21:30         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06 21:30           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06 21:30           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06 21:30           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-06 21:30           ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] arm, unicore32: remove early_alloc*() wrappers Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 15:47   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:27   ` Rob Herring
2018-12-03 16:27     ` Rob Herring
2018-12-03 16:27     ` Rob Herring
2018-12-03 16:27     ` Rob Herring
2018-12-03 16:27     ` [OpenRISC] " Rob Herring
2018-12-03 16:55     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:55       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:55       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:55       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-12-03 16:55       ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181203161052.GA4244@ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deanbo422@gmail.com \
    --cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
    --cc=gxt@pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.