All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2] packed-ring: fix example code
@ 2018-12-04 10:49 Tiwei Bie
  2018-12-04 17:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tiwei Bie @ 2018-12-04 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: virtio-dev; +Cc: mst, cohuck, stefanha

Driver can't just check whether USED bit equals to the used
wrap counter when checking whether a descriptor is a used
descriptor. Below is an example:

Assuming ring size is 4, ring's initial state will be:

+----+----+----+----+
| 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
+----+----+----+----+

00 means AVAIL=0 USED=0, 01 means AVAIL=0 USED=1
10 means AVAIL=1 USED=0, 11 means AVAIL=1 USED=1

After driver made two descriptor chains available and each
chain consists of two descriptors, the ring could be:

+----+-----------+----+-----------+
| 10 | 10 (id=0) | 10 | 10 (id=1) |
+----+-----------+----+-----------+

After device processed all the available descriptors and made
them used (e.g. in order), the ring could be:

+-----------+----+-----------+----+
| 11 (id=0) | 10 | 11 (id=1) | 10 |
+-----------+----+-----------+----+

After driver processed all the used descriptors and made
one descriptor (not chained, just one descriptor) available,
the ring could be:

+-----------+----+----+----+
| 01 (id=0) | 10 | 11 | 10 |
+-----------+----+----+----+

After device made that descriptor used, the ring will be:

+-----------+----+----+----+
| 00 (id=0) | 10 | 11 | 10 |
+-----------+----+----+----+

If driver just checks whether USED bit equals to the used
wrap counter when checking whether a descriptor is a used
descriptor, after processing the first descriptor (whose
AVAIL and USED bits are both 0), and advancing vq->next_used
pointer, it will then also treat the next descriptor, i.e.
the second descriptor (whose AVAIL and USED bits are 1 and
0 respectively) as a used descriptor which is wrong. The
most straightforward way to fix it is to also check whether
AVAIL bit equals to USED bit.

Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/29
Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
---
v2:
- Add "Fixes" tag;
- Refine commit log;

 packed-ring.tex | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/packed-ring.tex b/packed-ring.tex
index f24f49b..c913768 100644
--- a/packed-ring.tex
+++ b/packed-ring.tex
@@ -688,15 +688,17 @@ for (;;) {
         struct pvirtq_desc *d = vq->desc[vq->next_used];
 
         flags = d->flags;
+        bool avail = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL;
         bool used = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED;
 
-        if (used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
+        if (avail != used || used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
                 vq->driver_event.flags = RING_EVENT_FLAGS_ENABLE;
                 memory_barrier();
 
                 flags = d->flags;
+                bool avail = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL;
                 bool used = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED;
-                if (used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
+                if (avail != used || used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
                         break;
                 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] packed-ring: fix example code
  2018-12-04 10:49 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2] packed-ring: fix example code Tiwei Bie
@ 2018-12-04 17:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2018-12-05  2:07   ` Tiwei Bie
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2018-12-04 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tiwei Bie; +Cc: virtio-dev, cohuck, stefanha

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:49:29PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> Driver can't just check whether USED bit equals to the used
> wrap counter when checking whether a descriptor is a used
> descriptor. Below is an example:
> 
> Assuming ring size is 4, ring's initial state will be:
> 
> +----+----+----+----+
> | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
> +----+----+----+----+
> 
> 00 means AVAIL=0 USED=0, 01 means AVAIL=0 USED=1
> 10 means AVAIL=1 USED=0, 11 means AVAIL=1 USED=1
> 
> After driver made two descriptor chains available and each
> chain consists of two descriptors, the ring could be:
> 
> +----+-----------+----+-----------+
> | 10 | 10 (id=0) | 10 | 10 (id=1) |
> +----+-----------+----+-----------+
> 
> After device processed all the available descriptors and made
> them used (e.g. in order), the ring could be:
> 
> +-----------+----+-----------+----+
> | 11 (id=0) | 10 | 11 (id=1) | 10 |
> +-----------+----+-----------+----+
> 
> After driver processed all the used descriptors and made
> one descriptor (not chained, just one descriptor) available,
> the ring could be:
> 
> +-----------+----+----+----+
> | 01 (id=0) | 10 | 11 | 10 |
> +-----------+----+----+----+
> 
> After device made that descriptor used, the ring will be:
> 
> +-----------+----+----+----+
> | 00 (id=0) | 10 | 11 | 10 |
> +-----------+----+----+----+
> 
> If driver just checks whether USED bit equals to the used
> wrap counter when checking whether a descriptor is a used
> descriptor, after processing the first descriptor (whose
> AVAIL and USED bits are both 0), and advancing vq->next_used
> pointer, it will then also treat the next descriptor, i.e.
> the second descriptor (whose AVAIL and USED bits are 1 and
> 0 respectively) as a used descriptor which is wrong. The
> most straightforward way to fix it is to also check whether
> AVAIL bit equals to USED bit.
> 
> Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/29
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Add "Fixes" tag;
> - Refine commit log;
> 
>  packed-ring.tex | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/packed-ring.tex b/packed-ring.tex
> index f24f49b..c913768 100644
> --- a/packed-ring.tex
> +++ b/packed-ring.tex
> @@ -688,15 +688,17 @@ for (;;) {
>          struct pvirtq_desc *d = vq->desc[vq->next_used];
>  
>          flags = d->flags;
> +        bool avail = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL;
>          bool used = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED;
>  
> -        if (used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
> +        if (avail != used || used != vq->used_wrap_count) {

I think I prefer avail != vq->used_wrap_count.
This is imho clearer because both bits are controlled by the driver.

And maybe add a comment along the lines of

/*
 * Check that
 * 1. Descriptor has been made available.
 *    Note: there are many other way to check this, e.g.
 *    track number of outstanding available descriptors or buffers
 *    and check that it's not 0.
 * 2. Descriptor has been used by device.
 */

>                  vq->driver_event.flags = RING_EVENT_FLAGS_ENABLE;
>                  memory_barrier();
>  
>                  flags = d->flags;
> +                bool avail = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL;
>                  bool used = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED;
> -                if (used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
> +                if (avail != used || used != vq->used_wrap_count) {

So why do we need to re-test avail here? I guess it's in case
driver is making descriptors available in parallel?
If so maybe explain that:

/* 
 * Re-test in case another thread submitted more descriptors
 * and/or device used more descriptors before driver enabled events.
 */


>                          break;
>                  }


>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] packed-ring: fix example code
  2018-12-04 17:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2018-12-05  2:07   ` Tiwei Bie
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tiwei Bie @ 2018-12-05  2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: virtio-dev, cohuck, stefanha

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 12:11:38PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:49:29PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > Driver can't just check whether USED bit equals to the used
> > wrap counter when checking whether a descriptor is a used
> > descriptor. Below is an example:
> > 
> > Assuming ring size is 4, ring's initial state will be:
> > 
> > +----+----+----+----+
> > | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
> > +----+----+----+----+
> > 
> > 00 means AVAIL=0 USED=0, 01 means AVAIL=0 USED=1
> > 10 means AVAIL=1 USED=0, 11 means AVAIL=1 USED=1
> > 
> > After driver made two descriptor chains available and each
> > chain consists of two descriptors, the ring could be:
> > 
> > +----+-----------+----+-----------+
> > | 10 | 10 (id=0) | 10 | 10 (id=1) |
> > +----+-----------+----+-----------+
> > 
> > After device processed all the available descriptors and made
> > them used (e.g. in order), the ring could be:
> > 
> > +-----------+----+-----------+----+
> > | 11 (id=0) | 10 | 11 (id=1) | 10 |
> > +-----------+----+-----------+----+
> > 
> > After driver processed all the used descriptors and made
> > one descriptor (not chained, just one descriptor) available,
> > the ring could be:
> > 
> > +-----------+----+----+----+
> > | 01 (id=0) | 10 | 11 | 10 |
> > +-----------+----+----+----+
> > 
> > After device made that descriptor used, the ring will be:
> > 
> > +-----------+----+----+----+
> > | 00 (id=0) | 10 | 11 | 10 |
> > +-----------+----+----+----+
> > 
> > If driver just checks whether USED bit equals to the used
> > wrap counter when checking whether a descriptor is a used
> > descriptor, after processing the first descriptor (whose
> > AVAIL and USED bits are both 0), and advancing vq->next_used
> > pointer, it will then also treat the next descriptor, i.e.
> > the second descriptor (whose AVAIL and USED bits are 1 and
> > 0 respectively) as a used descriptor which is wrong. The
> > most straightforward way to fix it is to also check whether
> > AVAIL bit equals to USED bit.
> > 
> > Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/29
> > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Add "Fixes" tag;
> > - Refine commit log;
> > 
> >  packed-ring.tex | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/packed-ring.tex b/packed-ring.tex
> > index f24f49b..c913768 100644
> > --- a/packed-ring.tex
> > +++ b/packed-ring.tex
> > @@ -688,15 +688,17 @@ for (;;) {
> >          struct pvirtq_desc *d = vq->desc[vq->next_used];
> >  
> >          flags = d->flags;
> > +        bool avail = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL;
> >          bool used = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED;
> >  
> > -        if (used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
> > +        if (avail != used || used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
> 
> I think I prefer avail != vq->used_wrap_count.
> This is imho clearer because both bits are controlled by the driver.
> 
> And maybe add a comment along the lines of
> 
> /*
>  * Check that
>  * 1. Descriptor has been made available.
>  *    Note: there are many other way to check this, e.g.
>  *    track number of outstanding available descriptors or buffers
>  *    and check that it's not 0.
>  * 2. Descriptor has been used by device.
>  */
> 

OK.

> >                  vq->driver_event.flags = RING_EVENT_FLAGS_ENABLE;
> >                  memory_barrier();
> >  
> >                  flags = d->flags;
> > +                bool avail = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL;
> >                  bool used = flags & VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED;
> > -                if (used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
> > +                if (avail != used || used != vq->used_wrap_count) {
> 
> So why do we need to re-test avail here? I guess it's in case
> driver is making descriptors available in parallel?
> If so maybe explain that:
> 
> /* 
>  * Re-test in case another thread submitted more descriptors
>  * and/or device used more descriptors before driver enabled events.
>  */
> 

OK.

Thanks

> 
> >                          break;
> >                  }
> 
> 
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-05  2:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-04 10:49 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2] packed-ring: fix example code Tiwei Bie
2018-12-04 17:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-05  2:07   ` Tiwei Bie

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.