From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, vladimir.murzin@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
dave.martin@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:58:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206095825.GA22201@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b61f749d-9d65-fb76-74b5-b999fecad42b@arm.com>
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:14:53PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 05/12/2018 15:02, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 05:18:00PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> >>index 12f93e4d..2e26375 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> >>@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct midr_range {
> >> .rv_max = MIDR_CPU_VAR_REV(v_max, r_max), \
> >> }
> >>+#define MIDR_REV_RANGE(m, v, r_min, r_max) MIDR_RANGE(m, v, r_min, v, r_max)
> >
> >What's the point of this macro?
>
> That can be used to specify a set of MIDRs which has the same "variant" but a
> range of "revisions". This is used for the A53 errata and also for the Cavium
> errata in the following patch.
Gah, I read this at least 10 times and I /still/ failed to spot the extra
'v' argument to MIDR_RANGE!
Ignore my silly comment; I'll queue this up today. Thanks.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
dave.martin@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
vladimir.murzin@arm.com, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:58:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206095825.GA22201@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b61f749d-9d65-fb76-74b5-b999fecad42b@arm.com>
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:14:53PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 05/12/2018 15:02, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 05:18:00PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> >>index 12f93e4d..2e26375 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
> >>@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct midr_range {
> >> .rv_max = MIDR_CPU_VAR_REV(v_max, r_max), \
> >> }
> >>+#define MIDR_REV_RANGE(m, v, r_min, r_max) MIDR_RANGE(m, v, r_min, v, r_max)
> >
> >What's the point of this macro?
>
> That can be used to specify a set of MIDRs which has the same "variant" but a
> range of "revisions". This is used for the A53 errata and also for the Cavium
> errata in the following patch.
Gah, I read this at least 10 times and I /still/ failed to spot the extra
'v' argument to MIDR_RANGE!
Ignore my silly comment; I'll queue this up today. Thanks.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-06 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-30 17:17 [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64: capabilities: Optimize checking and enabling Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:17 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-05 15:02 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-05 15:02 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-05 17:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-05 17:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-12-06 9:58 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-12-06 9:58 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge duplicate Cavium erratum entries Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge duplicate entries for Qualcomm erratum 1003 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: capabilities: Speed up capability lookup Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: capabilities: Optimize this_cpu_has_cap Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arm64: capabilities: Use linear array for detection and verification Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: capabilities: Batch cpu_enable callbacks Suzuki K Poulose
2018-11-30 17:18 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181206095825.GA22201@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.