[PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Wolfram Sang]

Update the comment because we don't set the pointer to NULL anymore.
Also use the correct pointer name 'dma_ops' instead of 'dma_map_ops'.

Fixes: 1874619a7df4 ("ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()")
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 66566472c153..e3b04786838f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_iommu_attach_device);
  * @dev: valid struct device pointer
  *
  * Detaches the provided device from a previously attached map.
- * This voids the dma operations (dma_map_ops pointer)
+ * This overwrites the dma_ops pointer with appropriate non-IOMMU ops.
  */
 void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
 {
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Wolfram Sang]

Update the comment because we don't set the pointer to NULL anymore.
Also use the correct pointer name 'dma_ops' instead of 'dma_map_ops'.

Fixes: 1874619a7df4 ("ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()")
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 66566472c153..e3b04786838f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_iommu_attach_device);
  * @dev: valid struct device pointer
  *
  * Detaches the provided device from a previously attached map.
- * This voids the dma operations (dma_map_ops pointer)
+ * This overwrites the dma_ops pointer with appropriate non-IOMMU ops.
  */
 void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
 {
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Simon Horman]

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Update the comment because we don't set the pointer to NULL anymore.
> Also use the correct pointer name 'dma_ops' instead of 'dma_map_ops'.
> 
> Fixes: 1874619a7df4 ("ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()")
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 66566472c153..e3b04786838f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_iommu_attach_device);
>   * @dev: valid struct device pointer
>   *
>   * Detaches the provided device from a previously attached map.
> - * This voids the dma operations (dma_map_ops pointer)
> + * This overwrites the dma_ops pointer with appropriate non-IOMMU ops.
>   */
>  void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

[PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Simon Horman]

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Update the comment because we don't set the pointer to NULL anymore.
> Also use the correct pointer name 'dma_ops' instead of 'dma_map_ops'.
> 
> Fixes: 1874619a7df4 ("ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()")
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 66566472c153..e3b04786838f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_iommu_attach_device);
>   * @dev: valid struct device pointer
>   *
>   * Detaches the provided device from a previously attached map.
> - * This voids the dma operations (dma_map_ops pointer)
> + * This overwrites the dma_ops pointer with appropriate non-IOMMU ops.
>   */
>  void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1205 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Update the comment because we don't set the pointer to NULL anymore.
> Also use the correct pointer name 'dma_ops' instead of 'dma_map_ops'.
> 
> Fixes: 1874619a7df4 ("ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()")
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Russell, is this patch in your realm? If not, whom should I contact?

Thanks!

> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 66566472c153..e3b04786838f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_iommu_attach_device);
>   * @dev: valid struct device pointer
>   *
>   * Detaches the provided device from a previously attached map.
> - * This voids the dma operations (dma_map_ops pointer)
> + * This overwrites the dma_ops pointer with appropriate non-IOMMU ops.
>   */
>  void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1205 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Update the comment because we don't set the pointer to NULL anymore.
> Also use the correct pointer name 'dma_ops' instead of 'dma_map_ops'.
> 
> Fixes: 1874619a7df4 ("ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()")
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Russell, is this patch in your realm? If not, whom should I contact?

Thanks!

> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 66566472c153..e3b04786838f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_iommu_attach_device);
>   * @dev: valid struct device pointer
>   *
>   * Detaches the provided device from a previously attached map.
> - * This voids the dma operations (dma_map_ops pointer)
> + * This overwrites the dma_ops pointer with appropriate non-IOMMU ops.
>   */
>  void arm_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Wolfram,

On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Update the comment because we don't set the pointer to NULL anymore.
> > Also use the correct pointer name 'dma_ops' instead of 'dma_map_ops'.
> >
> > Fixes: 1874619a7df4 ("ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()")
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> Russell, is this patch in your realm? If not, whom should I contact?

Probably you should contact Russell's patch system, instead of Russell's
human email instance, cfr. Documentation/arm/README

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Wolfram,

On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Update the comment because we don't set the pointer to NULL anymore.
> > Also use the correct pointer name 'dma_ops' instead of 'dma_map_ops'.
> >
> > Fixes: 1874619a7df4 ("ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()")
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> Russell, is this patch in your realm? If not, whom should I contact?

Probably you should contact Russell's patch system, instead of Russell's
human email instance, cfr. Documentation/arm/README

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 381 bytes --]

Hi Geert,

> Probably you should contact Russell's patch system, instead of Russell's
> human email instance, cfr. Documentation/arm/README

I didn't do this so far because rmk's patch tracker says "please submit
all patches to the linux-arm-kernel mailing list for community review
prior to submission here."

But hey, you reviewed it, maybe this will do :)

Thanks,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dma-mapping: update comment about handling dma_ops when detaching from IOMMU

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 381 bytes --]

Hi Geert,

> Probably you should contact Russell's patch system, instead of Russell's
> human email instance, cfr. Documentation/arm/README

I didn't do this so far because rmk's patch tracker says "please submit
all patches to the linux-arm-kernel mailing list for community review
prior to submission here."

But hey, you reviewed it, maybe this will do :)

Thanks,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel