From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: dm: fix inflight IO check
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:32:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211003204.GA14673@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4fec4b01-35f9-8008-22ec-2ac8af58b854@kernel.dk>
On Mon, Dec 10 2018 at 5:45pm -0500,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> After switching to percpu inflight counters, the inflight check
> is totally buggy. It's perfectly valid for some counters to be
> non-zero while having a total inflight IO count of 0, that's how
> these kinds of counters work (inc on one CPU, dec on another).
> Fix the md_in_flight() check to sum all counters before returning
> a false positive, potentially.
>
> While at it, remove the inflight read for IO completion. We don't
> need it, just wake anyone that's waiting for the IO count to drop
> to zero. The caller needs to re-check that value anyway when woken,
> which it does.
>
> Fixes: 6f75723190d8 ("dm: remove the pending IO accounting")
> Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
I'm seeing that device-mapper-test-suite's "resize_io" test doesn't
pass. Glad this resolves the xfstest issue but I think more work is
needed, so I'll build any additional changes on this fix.
Thanks.
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index 70568f8b6c53..79ad4b3d215c 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -650,14 +650,14 @@ static bool md_in_flight(struct mapped_device *md)
> {
> int cpu;
> struct hd_struct *part = &dm_disk(md)->part0;
> + long sum = 0;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - if (part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[0], cpu) ||
> - part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[1], cpu))
> - return true;
> + sum += part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[0], cpu);
> + sum += part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[1], cpu);
> }
>
> - return false;
> + return sum != 0;
> }
Heh, amazing any tests passed.. sorry for this
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-11 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-10 22:45 [PATCH] dm: fix inflight IO check Jens Axboe
2018-12-10 22:45 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-11 0:32 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-12-12 2:34 ` xfstests generic/347 was never correct [was: Re: dm: fix inflight IO check] Mike Snitzer
2018-12-12 2:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-12-12 15:18 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181211003204.GA14673@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.