From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/4] x86/TSC: Use RDTSCP
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:23:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211222326.14581-5-bp@alien8.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181211222326.14581-1-bp@alien8.de>
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Currently, the kernel uses
[LM]FENCE; RDTSC
in the timekeeping code, to guarantee monotonicity of time where the
*FENCE is selected based on vendor.
Replace that sequence with RDTSCP which is faster or on-par and gives
the same guarantees.
A microbenchmark on Intel shows that the change is on-par.
On AMD, the change is either on-par with the current LFENCE-prefixed
RDTSC and some are slightly better with RDTSCP.
The comparison is done with the LFENCE-prefixed RDTSC (and not with the
MFENCE-prefixed one, as one would normally expect) because all modern
AMD families make LFENCE serializing and thus avoid the heavy MFENCE by
effectively enabling X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC.
Co-developed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181119184556.11479-1-bp@alien8.de
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 91e4cf189914..5cc3930cb465 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long long rdtsc(void)
*/
static __always_inline unsigned long long rdtsc_ordered(void)
{
+ DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
+
/*
* The RDTSC instruction is not ordered relative to memory
* access. The Intel SDM and the AMD APM are both vague on this
@@ -227,9 +229,19 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long long rdtsc_ordered(void)
* ordering guarantees as reading from a global memory location
* that some other imaginary CPU is updating continuously with a
* time stamp.
+ *
+ * Thus, use the preferred barrier on the respective CPU, aiming for
+ * RDTSCP as the default.
*/
- barrier_nospec();
- return rdtsc();
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_3("rdtsc",
+ "mfence; rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_MFENCE_RDTSC,
+ "lfence; rdtsc", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC,
+ "rdtscp", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP)
+ : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)
+ /* RDTSCP clobbers ECX with MSR_TSC_AUX. */
+ :: "ecx");
+
+ return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
}
static inline unsigned long long native_read_pmc(int counter)
--
2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-11 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 22:23 [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86/alternative: Add ALTERNATIVE_3 Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] x86/alternatives: Add macro comments Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 11:57 ` [tip:x86/alternatives] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86/alternatives: Print containing function Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 11:58 ` [tip:x86/alternatives] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/alternatives: Add an ALTERNATIVE_3() macro Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 11:59 ` [tip:x86/alternatives] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:23 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-12-11 22:59 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] x86/TSC: Use RDTSCP Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-11 23:12 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2018-12-11 23:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 2:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-12 12:02 ` Andrea Parri
2018-12-12 10:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 18:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 18:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 18:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 20:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 20:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-14 13:39 ` David Laight
2018-12-15 18:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 14:15 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2018-12-12 14:18 ` Lendacky, Thomas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-11 23:37 Alexey Dobriyan
2018-12-11 23:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 0:06 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181211222326.14581-5-bp@alien8.de \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.