From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] x86/TSC: Use RDTSCP
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:00:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212200005.GF6653@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXcBa3eUN2okedig+sECnQ8zuSWojahqWLR4vWqD8mEhg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:50:30AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> As far as I know, RDTSCP gets the job done, as does LFENCE, RDTSC on
> Intel.
Same on AMD when LFENCE has been made dispatch-serializing.
> There was a big discussion a few years ago where we changed it
> from LFENCE;RDTSC;LFENCE to just LFENCE;RDTSC after everyone was
> reasonably convinced that the uarch would not dispatch two RDTSCs
> backwards if the first one was immediately preceeded by LFENCE.
Yeah, the second one won't pass the LFENCE so you won't see time going
backwards, sure.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 22:23 [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86/alternative: Add ALTERNATIVE_3 Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] x86/alternatives: Add macro comments Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 11:57 ` [tip:x86/alternatives] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86/alternatives: Print containing function Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 11:58 ` [tip:x86/alternatives] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/alternatives: Add an ALTERNATIVE_3() macro Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 11:59 ` [tip:x86/alternatives] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] x86/TSC: Use RDTSCP Borislav Petkov
2018-12-11 22:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-11 23:12 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2018-12-11 23:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 2:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-12 12:02 ` Andrea Parri
2018-12-12 10:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 18:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 18:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 18:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-12-12 20:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 20:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-14 13:39 ` David Laight
2018-12-15 18:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-12 14:15 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2018-12-12 14:18 ` Lendacky, Thomas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-11 23:37 Alexey Dobriyan
2018-12-11 23:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-12 0:06 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181212200005.GF6653@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.