From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: DT for 4.21
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:05:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212210553.jk4uznjimi37fd7p@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181211171112.GA30925@piout.net>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:11:12PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
>
> Here is the DT pull request for 4.21. The clock DT binding switch has
> been in -next for a while and doesn't seem to have any issue.
>
> This is based on the 4.20 fixes branch that you alredy pulled.
>
> The following changes since commit 4ab7ca092c3c7ac8b16aa28eba723a8868f82f14:
>
> ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: use the divided clock for SMC (2018-11-21 11:50:32 +0100)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux tags/at91-4.21-dt
>
> for you to fetch changes up to d8007306f6ad18f2ba0dcad68ffe9b2fd1d56bfb:
>
> ARM: dts: at91: nattis: initialize the BLON pin as output-low early (2018-11-21 12:24:50 +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> AT91 DT for 4.21
>
> - Switch most platforms to the new clock binding
> - Small improvement for Axentia nattis
Merged, but how does this affect downstream users who have out-of-tree DTS
files that include the SoC dtsi? Seems like lots of stuff would break.
-Olof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
arm@kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: DT for 4.21
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:05:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212210553.jk4uznjimi37fd7p@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181211171112.GA30925@piout.net>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:11:12PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
>
> Here is the DT pull request for 4.21. The clock DT binding switch has
> been in -next for a while and doesn't seem to have any issue.
>
> This is based on the 4.20 fixes branch that you alredy pulled.
>
> The following changes since commit 4ab7ca092c3c7ac8b16aa28eba723a8868f82f14:
>
> ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: use the divided clock for SMC (2018-11-21 11:50:32 +0100)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux tags/at91-4.21-dt
>
> for you to fetch changes up to d8007306f6ad18f2ba0dcad68ffe9b2fd1d56bfb:
>
> ARM: dts: at91: nattis: initialize the BLON pin as output-low early (2018-11-21 12:24:50 +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> AT91 DT for 4.21
>
> - Switch most platforms to the new clock binding
> - Small improvement for Axentia nattis
Merged, but how does this affect downstream users who have out-of-tree DTS
files that include the SoC dtsi? Seems like lots of stuff would break.
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 17:11 [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: DT for 4.21 Alexandre Belloni
2018-12-11 17:11 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-12-12 21:05 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2018-12-12 21:05 ` Olof Johansson
2018-12-12 22:27 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-12-12 22:27 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181212210553.jk4uznjimi37fd7p@localhost \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.