From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] printk: increase devkmsg write() ratelimit
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:46:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181219014657.GA3720@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181218174723.GK7485@zn.tnic>
On (12/18/18 18:47), Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So how much is not strict?
>
> And what happens if you raise that ratelimiting level and the *one* line
> which is most important for debugging an issue
Like you said, for debugging devkmsg=off works just fine. I don't mind
the ratelimiting and want to keep it; I just don't want errors to be
ratelimited.
> All I'm saying is, gradually raising the limit is the wrong approach
> - there will always be a case where something important doesn't get
> logged.
Well, OK.
> What we need is a different solution, maybe what Rostedt proposes or
> so...
Sure, a different approach and idea are welcome. This is RFC thread.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-19 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-18 9:18 [RFC][PATCH] printk: increase devkmsg write() ratelimit Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-18 11:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-18 13:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 11:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 13:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 14:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 14:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 15:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 15:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 15:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 16:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-18 17:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-19 8:50 ` Petr Mladek
2018-12-20 11:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-20 13:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-21 7:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 17:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-19 1:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-12-18 14:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181219014657.GA3720@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.