All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ericvh@gmail.com, rminnich@sandia.gov,
	lucho@ionkov.net, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 05:23:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181228022338.GA27992@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bm56vqg4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 985 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:18:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> We have a bit of an interesting problem with respect to the d_off
> field in struct dirent.
> 
> When running a 64-bit kernel on certain file systems, notably ext4,
> this field uses the full 63 bits even for small directories (strace -v
> output, wrapped here for readability):
> 
> getdents(3, [
>   {d_ino=1494304, d_off=3901177228673045825, d_reclen=40, d_name="authorized_keys", d_type=DT_REG},
>   {d_ino=1494277, d_off=7491915799041650922, d_reclen=24, d_name=".", d_type=DT_DIR},
>   {d_ino=1314655, d_off=9223372036854775807, d_reclen=24, d_name="..", d_type=DT_DIR}
> ], 32768) = 88
> 
> When running in 32-bit compat mode, this value is somehow truncated to
> 31 bits, for both the getdents and the getdents64 (!) system call (at
> least on i386).

Why getdents64 system call is affected by this truncation,
isn't it a kernel bug that has to be fixed in the kernel instead?


-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ericvh@gmail.com, rminnich@sandia.gov,
	lucho@ionkov.net, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 05:23:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181228022338.GA27992@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bm56vqg4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 985 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:18:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> We have a bit of an interesting problem with respect to the d_off
> field in struct dirent.
> 
> When running a 64-bit kernel on certain file systems, notably ext4,
> this field uses the full 63 bits even for small directories (strace -v
> output, wrapped here for readability):
> 
> getdents(3, [
>   {d_ino=1494304, d_off=3901177228673045825, d_reclen=40, d_name="authorized_keys", d_type=DT_REG},
>   {d_ino=1494277, d_off=7491915799041650922, d_reclen=24, d_name=".", d_type=DT_DIR},
>   {d_ino=1314655, d_off=9223372036854775807, d_reclen=24, d_name="..", d_type=DT_DIR}
> ], 32768) = 88
> 
> When running in 32-bit compat mode, this value is somehow truncated to
> 31 bits, for both the getdents and the getdents64 (!) system call (at
> least on i386).

Why getdents64 system call is affected by this truncation,
isn't it a kernel bug that has to be fixed in the kernel instead?


-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-28  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-27 17:18 d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation Florian Weimer
2018-12-27 17:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Florian Weimer
2018-12-27 17:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-27 17:38   ` [Qemu-devel] " Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-27 17:56   ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-27 17:56     ` [Qemu-devel] " Florian Weimer
2018-12-27 17:41 ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-28  0:23   ` Andreas Dilger
2018-12-28 11:18     ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-28 23:16       ` Andreas Dilger
2018-12-29  0:12         ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-29  1:54           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-29 16:49             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-30 13:59               ` Peter Maydell
2018-12-29  2:11       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-29  2:11         ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-29  2:37         ` Dominique Martinet
2018-12-29  3:14           ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-29  3:14             ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-29  4:04             ` [V9fs-developer] " Dominique Martinet
2018-12-29  4:04               ` [Qemu-devel] [V9fs-developer] " Dominique Martinet
2018-12-27 17:58 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-27 17:58   ` [Qemu-devel] " Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-27 18:09   ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-27 18:09     ` [Qemu-devel] " Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 11:53     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-28 11:53       ` [Qemu-devel] " Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-28 11:56       ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 11:56         ` [Qemu-devel] " Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 12:01         ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 12:01           ` [Qemu-devel] " Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 12:21           ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-28 12:21             ` [Qemu-devel] " Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-31 17:03       ` Joseph Myers
2018-12-31 17:03         ` [Qemu-devel] " Joseph Myers
2018-12-31 17:03         ` Joseph Myers
2019-01-02 13:16         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2019-01-02 13:16           ` [Qemu-devel] " Adhemerval Zanella
2018-12-28  2:23 ` Dmitry V. Levin [this message]
2018-12-28  2:23   ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-12-28  7:38   ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-28  7:38     ` [Qemu-devel] " Florian Weimer
2018-12-28 15:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-28 15:26   ` [Qemu-devel] " Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181228022338.GA27992@altlinux.org \
    --to=ldv@altlinux.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rminnich@sandia.gov \
    --cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.