From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"pasic@linux.ibm.com" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"borntraeger@de.ibm.com" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"dgilbert@redhat.com" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-balloon: tweak config_changed implementation
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:31:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190105192858-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73DEF57A3@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 03:32:44AM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> On Friday, January 4, 2019 11:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > struct virtio_balloon {
> > > struct virtio_device *vdev;
> > > struct virtqueue *inflate_vq, *deflate_vq, *stats_vq, *free_page_vq;
> > > @@ -77,6 +81,8 @@ struct virtio_balloon {
> > > /* Prevent updating balloon when it is being canceled. */
> > > spinlock_t stop_update_lock;
> > > bool stop_update;
> > > + /* Bitmap to indicate if reading the related config fields are needed
> > */
> > > + unsigned long config_read_bitmap;
> > >
> > > /* The list of allocated free pages, waiting to be given back to mm */
> > > struct list_head free_page_list;
> >
> > It seems that you never initialize this bitmap. Probably harmless here but
> > generally using uninitialized memory isn't good.
>
> We've used kzalloc to allocate the vb struct, so it's already 0-initialized :)
Ah ok. We do explicitly init other fields like stop_update so
it seems cleaner to init this one too though.
> > > +
> > > static int send_free_pages(struct virtio_balloon *vb) {
> > > int err;
> > > @@ -620,6 +630,7 @@ static int send_free_pages(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
> > > * stop the reporting.
> > > */
> > > cmd_id_active = virtio32_to_cpu(vb->vdev, vb-
> > >cmd_id_active);
> > > + virtio_balloon_read_cmd_id_received(vb);
>
>
> [1]
>
>
> > > if (cmd_id_active != vb->cmd_id_received)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > @@ -637,11 +648,9 @@ static int send_free_pages(struct virtio_balloon
> > *vb)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void report_free_page_func(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +static void virtio_balloon_report_free_page(struct virtio_balloon
> > > +*vb)
> > > {
> > > int err;
> > > - struct virtio_balloon *vb = container_of(work, struct virtio_balloon,
> > > - report_free_page_work);
> > > struct device *dev = &vb->vdev->dev;
> > >
> > > /* Start by sending the received cmd id to host with an outbuf. */
> > > @@ -659,6 +668,22 @@ static void report_free_page_func(struct
> > work_struct *work)
> > > dev_err(dev, "Failed to send a stop id, err = %d\n", err); }
> > >
> > > +static void report_free_page_func(struct work_struct *work) {
> > > + struct virtio_balloon *vb = container_of(work, struct virtio_balloon,
> > > + report_free_page_work);
> > > +
> > > + virtio_balloon_read_cmd_id_received(vb);
> >
> > This will not achieve what you are trying to do, which is cancel reporting if it's
> > in progress.
> >
> > You need to re-read each time you compare to cmd_id_active.
>
> Yes, already did, please see [1] above
Oh right. Sorry.
>
> > An API similar to
> > u32 virtio_balloon_cmd_id_received(vb)
> > seems to be called for, and I would rename cmd_id_received to
> > cmd_id_received_cache to make sure we caught all users.
> >
>
> I'm not sure about adding "cache" here, cmd_id_received refers to the cmd id
> that the driver just received from the device. There is one called "cmd_id_active" which
> is the one that the driver is actively using.
> So cmd_id_received is already a "cache" to " cmd_id_active " in some sense.
>
> Best,
> Wei
The point is that any access to cmd_id_received should first call
virtio_balloon_read_cmd_id_received. So a better API is
to have virtio_balloon_read_cmd_id_received return the value
instead of poking at cmd_id_received afterwards.
Renaming cmd_id_received will help make sure all no
call sites were missed and help stress it's never used directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"pasic@linux.ibm.com" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"borntraeger@de.ibm.com" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"dgilbert@redhat.com" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-balloon: tweak config_changed implementation
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:31:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190105192858-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F73DEF57A3@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 03:32:44AM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> On Friday, January 4, 2019 11:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > struct virtio_balloon {
> > > struct virtio_device *vdev;
> > > struct virtqueue *inflate_vq, *deflate_vq, *stats_vq, *free_page_vq;
> > > @@ -77,6 +81,8 @@ struct virtio_balloon {
> > > /* Prevent updating balloon when it is being canceled. */
> > > spinlock_t stop_update_lock;
> > > bool stop_update;
> > > + /* Bitmap to indicate if reading the related config fields are needed
> > */
> > > + unsigned long config_read_bitmap;
> > >
> > > /* The list of allocated free pages, waiting to be given back to mm */
> > > struct list_head free_page_list;
> >
> > It seems that you never initialize this bitmap. Probably harmless here but
> > generally using uninitialized memory isn't good.
>
> We've used kzalloc to allocate the vb struct, so it's already 0-initialized :)
Ah ok. We do explicitly init other fields like stop_update so
it seems cleaner to init this one too though.
> > > +
> > > static int send_free_pages(struct virtio_balloon *vb) {
> > > int err;
> > > @@ -620,6 +630,7 @@ static int send_free_pages(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
> > > * stop the reporting.
> > > */
> > > cmd_id_active = virtio32_to_cpu(vb->vdev, vb-
> > >cmd_id_active);
> > > + virtio_balloon_read_cmd_id_received(vb);
>
>
> [1]
>
>
> > > if (cmd_id_active != vb->cmd_id_received)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > @@ -637,11 +648,9 @@ static int send_free_pages(struct virtio_balloon
> > *vb)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void report_free_page_func(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +static void virtio_balloon_report_free_page(struct virtio_balloon
> > > +*vb)
> > > {
> > > int err;
> > > - struct virtio_balloon *vb = container_of(work, struct virtio_balloon,
> > > - report_free_page_work);
> > > struct device *dev = &vb->vdev->dev;
> > >
> > > /* Start by sending the received cmd id to host with an outbuf. */
> > > @@ -659,6 +668,22 @@ static void report_free_page_func(struct
> > work_struct *work)
> > > dev_err(dev, "Failed to send a stop id, err = %d\n", err); }
> > >
> > > +static void report_free_page_func(struct work_struct *work) {
> > > + struct virtio_balloon *vb = container_of(work, struct virtio_balloon,
> > > + report_free_page_work);
> > > +
> > > + virtio_balloon_read_cmd_id_received(vb);
> >
> > This will not achieve what you are trying to do, which is cancel reporting if it's
> > in progress.
> >
> > You need to re-read each time you compare to cmd_id_active.
>
> Yes, already did, please see [1] above
Oh right. Sorry.
>
> > An API similar to
> > u32 virtio_balloon_cmd_id_received(vb)
> > seems to be called for, and I would rename cmd_id_received to
> > cmd_id_received_cache to make sure we caught all users.
> >
>
> I'm not sure about adding "cache" here, cmd_id_received refers to the cmd id
> that the driver just received from the device. There is one called "cmd_id_active" which
> is the one that the driver is actively using.
> So cmd_id_received is already a "cache" to " cmd_id_active " in some sense.
>
> Best,
> Wei
The point is that any access to cmd_id_received should first call
virtio_balloon_read_cmd_id_received. So a better API is
to have virtio_balloon_read_cmd_id_received return the value
instead of poking at cmd_id_received afterwards.
Renaming cmd_id_received will help make sure all no
call sites were missed and help stress it's never used directly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-06 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-04 7:11 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-balloon: tweak config_changed Wei Wang
2019-01-04 7:11 ` Wei Wang
2019-01-04 7:11 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-balloon: tweak config_changed implementation Wei Wang
2019-01-04 7:11 ` Wei Wang
2019-01-04 11:02 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2019-01-04 11:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-04 11:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-04 11:26 ` [virtio-dev] " Halil Pasic
2019-01-04 11:26 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-04 11:26 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-04 15:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-04 15:44 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-04 15:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-05 3:32 ` Wang, Wei W
2019-01-05 3:32 ` [virtio-dev] " Wang, Wei W
2019-01-05 3:32 ` Wang, Wei W
2019-01-06 0:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-01-06 0:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-06 0:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-04 7:11 ` Wei Wang
2019-01-04 7:11 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-balloon: improve update_balloon_size_func Wei Wang
2019-01-04 7:11 ` Wei Wang
2019-01-04 7:11 ` Wei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190105192858-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.