From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"open list:X86" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xen: preserve COMPAT in CFLAGS
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:20:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107152016.03464ee3.olaf@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181213110525.GY18875@perard.uk.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 612 bytes --]
Am Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:05:25 +0000
schrieb Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Ian, we have those XC_WANT_COMPAT_* #defines to allow consumers of Xen
> libs be able to use old interfaces. Do you think it's a good idea to
> have this consumers (QEMU here) #undef the flag when it has implemented
> the newer interface?
I think the wording is wrong.
The defines exist to expose existing APIs to software that was not updated to use the "latest" API. To me it looks like the undef's are wrong. Even the usage in configure looks bogus, but that is another unrelated thing.
Olaf
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"open list:X86" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] xen: preserve COMPAT in CFLAGS
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:20:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107152016.03464ee3.olaf@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181213110525.GY18875@perard.uk.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 612 bytes --]
Am Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:05:25 +0000
schrieb Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Ian, we have those XC_WANT_COMPAT_* #defines to allow consumers of Xen
> libs be able to use old interfaces. Do you think it's a good idea to
> have this consumers (QEMU here) #undef the flag when it has implemented
> the newer interface?
I think the wording is wrong.
The defines exist to expose existing APIs to software that was not updated to use the "latest" API. To me it looks like the undef's are wrong. Even the usage in configure looks bogus, but that is another unrelated thing.
Olaf
[-- Attachment #2: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-07 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 10:10 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] xen: preserve COMPAT in CFLAGS Olaf Hering
2018-12-11 9:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] " Olaf Hering
2018-12-11 9:24 ` Olaf Hering
2018-12-13 11:05 ` Anthony PERARD
2018-12-13 11:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony PERARD
2019-01-07 14:20 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2019-01-07 14:20 ` Olaf Hering
2019-01-21 16:16 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-01-21 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony PERARD
2019-01-21 17:23 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-01-21 17:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony PERARD
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-26 10:10 Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190107152016.03464ee3.olaf@aepfle.de \
--to=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.