From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xprtrdma: Double free in rpcrdma_sendctxs_create()
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 18:41:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107184148.GC3253@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0CEEB35A-2083-4888-9035-8A9ADF22E8E3@oracle.com>
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 11:24:45AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 2019, at 8:06 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > The clean up is handled by the caller, rpcrdma_buffer_create(), so this
> > call to rpcrdma_sendctxs_destroy() leads to a double free.
>
> True. This fix is adequate, but I'm wondering if rpcrdma_sendctxs_destroy
> should be made more careful about being called twice. Hm.
>
I actually wrote the patch like that originally, but then this way made
for an easier patch description so I re-wrote it. Let me send the other
patch and you can apply that or both if you want.
regards,
dan carpenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xprtrdma: Double free in rpcrdma_sendctxs_create()
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 21:41:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107184148.GC3253@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0CEEB35A-2083-4888-9035-8A9ADF22E8E3@oracle.com>
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 11:24:45AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 2019, at 8:06 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > The clean up is handled by the caller, rpcrdma_buffer_create(), so this
> > call to rpcrdma_sendctxs_destroy() leads to a double free.
>
> True. This fix is adequate, but I'm wondering if rpcrdma_sendctxs_destroy
> should be made more careful about being called twice. Hm.
>
I actually wrote the patch like that originally, but then this way made
for an easier patch description so I re-wrote it. Let me send the other
patch and you can apply that or both if you want.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-07 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-05 13:06 [PATCH 2/2] xprtrdma: Double free in rpcrdma_sendctxs_create() Dan Carpenter
2019-01-05 13:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-05 16:24 ` Chuck Lever
2019-01-05 16:24 ` Chuck Lever
2019-01-07 17:22 ` Bruce Fields
2019-01-07 17:22 ` Bruce Fields
2019-01-07 22:21 ` Schumaker, Anna
2019-01-07 22:21 ` Schumaker, Anna
2019-01-07 18:41 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2019-01-07 18:41 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-07 19:08 ` [PATCH] xprtrdma: Make rpcrdma_sendctxs_destroy() more robust Dan Carpenter
2019-01-07 19:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-07 21:25 ` Chuck Lever
2019-01-07 21:25 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190107184148.GC3253@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.