From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>,
"Pawel Osciak" <pawel@osciak.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with dma_map_resource
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:54:16 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190111175416.7d291e25@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190111181731.11782-4-hch@lst.de>
Em Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:17:31 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> escreveu:
> vb2_dc_get_userptr pokes into arm direct mapping details to get the
> resemblance of a dma address for a a physical address that does is
> not backed by a page struct. Not only is this not portable to other
> architectures with dma direct mapping offsets, but also not to uses
> of IOMMUs of any kind. Switch to the proper dma_map_resource /
> dma_unmap_resource interface instead.
Makes sense to me. I'm assuming that you'll be pushing it together
with other mm patches, so:
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 41 ++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> index aff0ab7bf83d..82389aead6ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> @@ -439,42 +439,14 @@ static void vb2_dc_put_userptr(void *buf_priv)
> set_page_dirty_lock(pages[i]);
> sg_free_table(sgt);
> kfree(sgt);
> + } else {
> + dma_unmap_resource(buf->dev, buf->dma_addr, buf->size,
> + buf->dma_dir, 0);
> }
> vb2_destroy_framevec(buf->vec);
> kfree(buf);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * For some kind of reserved memory there might be no struct page available,
> - * so all that can be done to support such 'pages' is to try to convert
> - * pfn to dma address or at the last resort just assume that
> - * dma address == physical address (like it has been assumed in earlier version
> - * of videobuf2-dma-contig
> - */
> -
> -#ifdef __arch_pfn_to_dma
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__arch_pfn_to_dma(dev, pfn);
> -}
> -#elif defined(__pfn_to_bus)
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_bus(pfn);
> -}
> -#elif defined(__pfn_to_phys)
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_phys(pfn);
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - /* really, we cannot do anything better at this point */
> - return (dma_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static void *vb2_dc_get_userptr(struct device *dev, unsigned long vaddr,
> unsigned long size, enum dma_data_direction dma_dir)
> {
> @@ -528,7 +500,12 @@ static void *vb2_dc_get_userptr(struct device *dev, unsigned long vaddr,
> for (i = 1; i < n_pages; i++)
> if (nums[i-1] + 1 != nums[i])
> goto fail_pfnvec;
> - buf->dma_addr = vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(buf->dev, nums[0]);
> + buf->dma_addr = dma_map_resource(buf->dev,
> + __pfn_to_phys(nums[0]), size, buf->dma_dir, 0);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(buf->dev, buf->dma_addr)) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto fail_pfnvec;
> + }
> goto out;
> }
>
Thanks,
Mauro
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>,
"Pawel Osciak" <pawel@osciak.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with dma_map_resource
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:54:16 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190111175416.7d291e25@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190111181731.11782-4-hch@lst.de>
Em Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:17:31 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> escreveu:
> vb2_dc_get_userptr pokes into arm direct mapping details to get the
> resemblance of a dma address for a a physical address that does is
> not backed by a page struct. Not only is this not portable to other
> architectures with dma direct mapping offsets, but also not to uses
> of IOMMUs of any kind. Switch to the proper dma_map_resource /
> dma_unmap_resource interface instead.
Makes sense to me. I'm assuming that you'll be pushing it together
with other mm patches, so:
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 41 ++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> index aff0ab7bf83d..82389aead6ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> @@ -439,42 +439,14 @@ static void vb2_dc_put_userptr(void *buf_priv)
> set_page_dirty_lock(pages[i]);
> sg_free_table(sgt);
> kfree(sgt);
> + } else {
> + dma_unmap_resource(buf->dev, buf->dma_addr, buf->size,
> + buf->dma_dir, 0);
> }
> vb2_destroy_framevec(buf->vec);
> kfree(buf);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * For some kind of reserved memory there might be no struct page available,
> - * so all that can be done to support such 'pages' is to try to convert
> - * pfn to dma address or at the last resort just assume that
> - * dma address == physical address (like it has been assumed in earlier version
> - * of videobuf2-dma-contig
> - */
> -
> -#ifdef __arch_pfn_to_dma
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__arch_pfn_to_dma(dev, pfn);
> -}
> -#elif defined(__pfn_to_bus)
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_bus(pfn);
> -}
> -#elif defined(__pfn_to_phys)
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_phys(pfn);
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - /* really, we cannot do anything better at this point */
> - return (dma_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static void *vb2_dc_get_userptr(struct device *dev, unsigned long vaddr,
> unsigned long size, enum dma_data_direction dma_dir)
> {
> @@ -528,7 +500,12 @@ static void *vb2_dc_get_userptr(struct device *dev, unsigned long vaddr,
> for (i = 1; i < n_pages; i++)
> if (nums[i-1] + 1 != nums[i])
> goto fail_pfnvec;
> - buf->dma_addr = vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(buf->dev, nums[0]);
> + buf->dma_addr = dma_map_resource(buf->dev,
> + __pfn_to_phys(nums[0]), size, buf->dma_dir, 0);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(buf->dev, buf->dma_addr)) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto fail_pfnvec;
> + }
> goto out;
> }
>
Thanks,
Mauro
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Pawel Osciak" <pawel@osciak.com>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with dma_map_resource
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:54:16 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190111175416.7d291e25@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190111181731.11782-4-hch@lst.de>
Em Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:17:31 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> escreveu:
> vb2_dc_get_userptr pokes into arm direct mapping details to get the
> resemblance of a dma address for a a physical address that does is
> not backed by a page struct. Not only is this not portable to other
> architectures with dma direct mapping offsets, but also not to uses
> of IOMMUs of any kind. Switch to the proper dma_map_resource /
> dma_unmap_resource interface instead.
Makes sense to me. I'm assuming that you'll be pushing it together
with other mm patches, so:
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 41 ++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> index aff0ab7bf83d..82389aead6ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> @@ -439,42 +439,14 @@ static void vb2_dc_put_userptr(void *buf_priv)
> set_page_dirty_lock(pages[i]);
> sg_free_table(sgt);
> kfree(sgt);
> + } else {
> + dma_unmap_resource(buf->dev, buf->dma_addr, buf->size,
> + buf->dma_dir, 0);
> }
> vb2_destroy_framevec(buf->vec);
> kfree(buf);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * For some kind of reserved memory there might be no struct page available,
> - * so all that can be done to support such 'pages' is to try to convert
> - * pfn to dma address or at the last resort just assume that
> - * dma address == physical address (like it has been assumed in earlier version
> - * of videobuf2-dma-contig
> - */
> -
> -#ifdef __arch_pfn_to_dma
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__arch_pfn_to_dma(dev, pfn);
> -}
> -#elif defined(__pfn_to_bus)
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_bus(pfn);
> -}
> -#elif defined(__pfn_to_phys)
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return (dma_addr_t)__pfn_to_phys(pfn);
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline dma_addr_t vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(struct device *dev, unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - /* really, we cannot do anything better at this point */
> - return (dma_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static void *vb2_dc_get_userptr(struct device *dev, unsigned long vaddr,
> unsigned long size, enum dma_data_direction dma_dir)
> {
> @@ -528,7 +500,12 @@ static void *vb2_dc_get_userptr(struct device *dev, unsigned long vaddr,
> for (i = 1; i < n_pages; i++)
> if (nums[i-1] + 1 != nums[i])
> goto fail_pfnvec;
> - buf->dma_addr = vb2_dc_pfn_to_dma(buf->dev, nums[0]);
> + buf->dma_addr = dma_map_resource(buf->dev,
> + __pfn_to_phys(nums[0]), size, buf->dma_dir, 0);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(buf->dev, buf->dma_addr)) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto fail_pfnvec;
> + }
> goto out;
> }
>
Thanks,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-11 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20190111181841epcas3p2d7c0bf8f5c11a9863e22ec1b12da6e1b@epcas3p2.samsung.com>
2019-01-11 18:17 ` fix a layering violation in videobuf2 and improve dma_map_resource Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] dma-mapping: remove the default map_resource implementation Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 13:12 ` Robin Murphy
2019-01-14 13:12 ` Robin Murphy
2019-01-14 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] dma-mapping: don't BUG when calling dma_map_resource on RAM Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 14:16 ` Robin Murphy
2019-01-14 14:16 ` Robin Murphy
2019-01-11 18:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with dma_map_resource Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-11 19:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2019-01-11 19:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-01-11 19:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-01-14 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 11:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-01-14 11:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-01-14 11:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-01-14 11:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 11:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 11:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 12:42 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-14 12:42 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-14 12:42 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-17 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-17 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-18 9:41 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-18 9:41 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-18 9:41 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-31 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-14 11:43 ` fix a layering violation in videobuf2 and improve dma_map_resource Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-14 11:43 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-14 11:43 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-01-18 11:37 fix a layering violation in videobuf2 and improve dma_map_resource v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-18 11:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with dma_map_resource Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-18 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-18 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190111175416.7d291e25@coco.lan \
--to=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.